African Journal of
Agricultural Research

  • Abbreviation: Afr. J. Agric. Res.
  • Language: English
  • ISSN: 1991-637X
  • DOI: 10.5897/AJAR
  • Start Year: 2006
  • Published Articles: 6714

Full Length Research Paper

Crambe meal in diets supplemented with enzyme complex solid state fermentation (SSF) for Nile tilapia

Guilherme de Souza Moura*
  • Guilherme de Souza Moura*
  • Aquaculture and Aquatic Ecology Lab, Animal Science Department, Federal University of Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri (UFVJM), Diamantina, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
  • Google Scholar
Marcelo Mattos Pedreira
  • Marcelo Mattos Pedreira
  • Aquaculture and Aquatic Ecology Lab, Animal Science Department, Federal University of Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri (UFVJM), Diamantina, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
  • Google Scholar
Eduardo Arruda Teixeira Lanna
  • Eduardo Arruda Teixeira Lanna
  • LABNUT, Animal Science Department, Federal University of Viçosa, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
  • Google Scholar
Alcione Eneida Santos
  • Alcione Eneida Santos
  • Aquaculture and Aquatic Ecology Lab, Animal Science Department, Federal University of Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri (UFVJM), Diamantina, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
  • Google Scholar
Talita Andrade Ferreira
  • Talita Andrade Ferreira
  • Aquaculture and Aquatic Ecology Lab, Animal Science Department, Federal University of Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri (UFVJM), Diamantina, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
  • Google Scholar
Aldrin Vieira Pires
  • Aldrin Vieira Pires
  • Aquaculture and Aquatic Ecology Lab, Animal Science Department, Federal University of Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri (UFVJM), Diamantina, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
  • Google Scholar


  •  Received: 27 March 2014
  •  Accepted: 09 January 2015
  •  Published: 22 January 2015

 ABSTRACT

Nile tilapia performance fed with diets containing crambe meal supplied with enzyme complex SSF was evaluated. With initial average weight ranging between 1.133g ± 0.105, 280 Nile tilapias were randomized into seven treatments, with four replicates and 10 fish per tank, totaling 28 experimental units. The temperature-controlled recirculation system had 30 L per tank, with individual water supply and aeration. The physico-chemical parameters of the water (temperature, dissolved oxygen, ammonia and pH) were monitored periodically. The fish went through an adaptation period of one week prior to starting the trial. The treatments consisted of a control diet and others diets containing three levels of inclusion of crambe meal, being replaced in their proper proportion, the protein soya by the protein ingredient evaluated (5, 10 and 20%) with 500 ppm of enzyme complex SSF or not. The isoproteic diets (360 g.kg-1) contained the same amount of the ingredients, changing only the levels of inclusion of soya meal, crambe meal and inert. Fish were fed ad libitum four times per day. At 56 days, the tilapia performance was evaluated. The physic and chemistry parameters of water were within of the levels recommended for the species during all experimental time There was statistical difference for final weight, weight gain and feed conversion. It is concluded that the inclusion of up to 10% crambe meal supplemented with 500 ppm of enzyme complex SSF provides better performance and higher nitrogen retention for Nile tilapia.

 

Key words: Additives, Crambe abyssinica, fish nutrition, fish performance, Oreochromis niloticus.


 INTRODUCTION

In Brazil, the main raw material for production of oil is soy, responsible for over 70% of the biodiesel produced in the country. In this sense, there is a search for new oilseeds non-edible to biodiesel production within the international quality standards. Cultures little known in Brazil, such as crambe (Crambe abyssinica) and Jatropha (Jatropha curcas), appear as interesting alternatives for biodiesel production (Roscoe et al., 2007).
 
Recently, the interest in commercial cultivation of crambe is growing in several countries, including United States, Canada, Germany and Netherland. The planting of crambe in the Brazil  reached over  10000 ha in  2009,
 
being this oilseed used for culture rotation in grain production systems (Ferreira and Silva, 2011).  Liu et al. (1993) reported that the mains attractive for crambe production are: (a) Domestic source of erucic acid that may be used in additives of rubber, plastic, coatings and lubricants; (b) promise alternative for biodiesel production; (c) Byproduct with higher nutritional value that may be used in animal nutrition; (d) alternative culture as a income source for farmers.
 
For animal feed, the economic viability of crambe depends of possibilities and limitations of this byproduct, because it has also in its composition some antinutritional factors. This product contains up to 10% of glucosinolate and hydrolases enzymes (TGSase), which limit the ingestion and affect directly the animal performance (Daxenbichler et al., 1968). With this, the crambe needs to pass by treatment for reduction of TGASase and glucosinolate levels. Some methods are used, as: Heat (Pereira et al., 1981), processing with chemistry additives, irradiation (Lessman and McCaslin, 1987) and water extraction after TGSase inactivation (Mustakas et al., 1976).
 
The presence of glucosinolates in diets for non-ruminants may cause tissue alterations, health problems and reduce intake (Kloss et al., 1994). Lesions in certain tissues (Van Etten et al., 1969) and high mortality (Tookey et al., 1980) were observed in rats that consumed diets containing high concentrations of glucosinolates. Broilers can be fed diets containing up to 50 g crambe meal.kg-1 diet with no adverse effects on gain and health (Ledoux et al., 1999).
 
Reducing the antinutritional factors, the crambe may be an alternative ingredient with high nutritional value for formulation of fish extruded diets, since the high temperature involved in this process reduces the levels of glucosinolate and inactive the enzymes that release toxic products. In rapeseed meal, Huang et al. (1995) observed that the glucosinolate levels decreased in the extrusion process. However, how is not possible to remove all antinutritional factors present in crambe, probably its participation will be limited in diet formulation for fish.
 
Therefore, the replacement of soya meal by crambe meal in extruded diets supplied with enzyme complex SSF on performance and body composition of Nile tilapia was evaluated.


 MATERIALS AND METHODS

The trial was conducted during the period of 56 days at the Laboratory of Aquatic Ecology and Fish Nutrition, Department of Animal Science, Federal University of Jequitinhonha and Mucuri (UFVJM). This lab is equipped with recirculating water system, which is endowed with biofilter, individual aeration and thermostat for temperature control. The temperature was controlled with a thermostat and measured daily at 8 am and 5 pm with thermometer of mercury bulb . The photoperiod used was 12 h of light controlled by electronic timer and total ammonia measured weekly.  For dissolved oxygen and pH were used oximeter (YSI 55) and pH meter (Quimis Q400H), respectively, being mensured directly every seven tanks, one repetition of each treatment. In these same tanks were collected samples of 20 ml of water each for total ammonia analysis according to Koroleff (1976). The tanks were cleaned by siphoning each two days, removing the faeces and other possible decanted materials. After all analysis of water quality, averages and standard deviations for each treatment were obtained.
 
It was used 280 Nile tilapia (Oreochomis niloticus) fingerlings with average initial weight of 1.133 ± 0.105 g distributed in a completely randomized design with seven treatments, four replicates and 10 fish by experimental unit.
 
The fingerlings were fed ad libitum, divided into four meal daily (8 am, 11 am, 2 pm and 5 pm), during every experimental time. For maximum intake without leftover, the ration were given in little amount until satiety. The extruded diets (Table 1) were processed in Animal Science Department of Federal University of Viçosa (UFV) using an extruder machine model Inbramaq MX40.
 
The enzyme complex SSF (Allzyme SSF, Alltech Inc.) was incorporated by jelly top coat. In the Lab, 42 g jelly was dissolved in 600 ml of boiling water. After the jelly to cool, but in liquid state, enzyme complex SSF previously weighed was added and mixed. In the bucket, eight kilogram of the diet was mixed with the enzymes jelly solution. The diet was spread on trays and dried overnight in a cool area with the help of fans.
 
The following performance parameters were evaluated: initial weight, final weight, weight gain (WG), feed conversion ratio (FCR), survival (SOB) and chemical body composition (dry matter, crude protein, ether extract, calcium and phosphorus). All fish in experimental unit were weighed at the beginning and end of the trial to determination of weight gain. For body composition analysis, every tilapias of each treatment were desensitization with eugenol, slaughtered and frozen in freezer (-18°C) at end of the trial. The diets and fish samples were sent at the Animal Nutrition Lab of Animal Science Department (LNA/DZO/UFVJM) for analysis, being used procedures described by Silva and Queiroz (2002).
 
For evaluation of treatments, the averages were compared by Duncan’s Test at 0.05. Through the F Test at 0.05 were mensured the enzyme effects between the treatments with the same level of replacement of protein from soya meal by protein of crambe meal (50, 100 and 200g.kg-1). The statistics analysis was done using the SAS (2002).
 


 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The recirculation system maintained the water quality into of accepted levels during all experimental time. It was observed average values of 28.35±0.43°C to temperature; 6.64±0.41 to pH; 5.59±0.39 ppm to dissolved oxygen and 0.05±0.006 mg.L-1 to total ammonia. Significant difference (p<0.05) was observed for final weight, weight gain and feed conversion (Table 2). In general, it was verified that the gradual addition of crambe meal worsened the performance of tilapia. However, by including the enzyme complex SSF, there was an improvement in performance parameters, mainly in feed conversion.
 
Significant difference (p<0.05) was observed only for phosphorus retention in relation to body composition analysis (Table 3). There was improvement in the body phosphorus retention by adding the enzyme complex in the diet, become more evident when comparing within the same level of substitution.
 
 
 
For Nile tilapia, Kubtiza (2000) recommend that the range of thermal comfort of the species should be of 26 to 30°C for temperature, 6 to 8.5 for pH, dissolved oxygen above of 4 mg.L-1 and total ammonia under of 0.2 mg.L-1, which are according with the results of this study. The final weight and weight gain were influenced by the inclusion of crambe meal and enzyme supplementation.
 
It is observed that the replacement of 20% from soybean meal protein to meal crambe protein had the worst weight gain. Although the replacement has been made regarding the crude protein, the levels of the other nutrients were also altered, modifying qualitatively the diet. The inclusion of crambe meal in the diet increased the amount of fiber, which may have promoted low retention time of feed in the digestive tract. Moreover, although the protein level being the same for all treatments, there was a gradual decrease in the levels of lysine, limiting amino acid directly related to protein deposition. Unlike the present study, Pretto et al. (2014) observed no difference in the performance of silver catfish (Rhamdia quelen) fed with diets containing up to 20% of replacement of crude protein from soya meal by crude protein crambe meal in nature or chemically treated. However, the authors corrected the synthetic amino acid levels in the formulation of diets, which may have “masked” the effect of crambe meal on the silver catfish performance.
 
Other authors studied alternatives of vegetables origin contained glucosinolate for feeding of fish. Working with Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus), Santos et al. (2009) concluded that there was no loss in performance and chemical composition of the fillet to replace 25% of soy protein by protein turnip (Brassica rapa). With the same fish species, Soares et al. (2001) verified that canola meal can be included to 35.40% (replacing 48.17% protein from soybean meal) in the diet without loss in performance. In pacus (Piaractus mesopotamicus), the addition of up to 19% of canola meal in the diet did not affect performance. Already in piavuçu (Leporinus macrocephalus), the maximum level of substitution was 11.19% for the same ingredient, without affecting performance (Gonçalves et al., 2002).
 
The plants belonging to the family of cruciferous vegetables such as radish, crambe, canola and rapeseed have in their composition the glucosinolates, which when intact, are not toxic to fish. However, the products of its hydrolysis by the action of the enzyme myrosinase or tioglicosidase may be detrimental to performance and health of this group of animals (Bell, 1993). More than 90% of the glucosinolates can be converted into epigoitrin (epi -PG) during the metabolism. In the seed, epi - PG is biologically separate of the enzyme thioglucosidase (TGSase). A reaction between the enzyme and epigoitrin can occur if the seed is crushed, if germinated, or when plant tissues are softened (Tookey et al., 1980). However, Oginsky et al. (1965) and Tani et al. (1974) reported that some intestinal bacteria (e.g., Enterobacter cloacae) are capable of displaying TGSase activity. The intake epi-PG and its subsequent hydrolysis can lead to the formation of a toxic product called aglucagon in digestive tract of animals. Thus, the nutritional value of crambe depends on the relative toxicity of epi - PG intact and product levels aglucon present. These products are toxic and have a bitter taste which makes it unpalatable meal.
 
The feed conversion also was influenced by treatments. It was observed that, in general way, there is a tendency of worsening in feed conversion with the inclusion of crambe meal in diet. However, the addition of enzyme complex SSF in diet improved the feed conversion up to 10% of replacement of soya meal protein by crambe meal protein. The fish fed with diets contained 10% of replacement and enzyme complex improved the feed conversion in 7.43 and 8.41%, when compared at control and the same level of replacement, respectively.
 
Enzyme action arising from the complex SSF probably provided greater amount of nutrients and reduced the effects of anti-nutritional factors. In a study testing inclusion levels of the same enzyme complex in diets for Nile tilapia, Moura et al. (2012) observed that there was increases in levels of sucrose, glucose and fructose in the chyme of this species, indicating that occurred an greater bioavailability of nutrients, positively influencing the performance. This is clearly evident when comparing the same inclusion levels of crambe meal with enzyme supplementation. Thus, it was observed an improvement in feed conversion of 9.31, 8.41 and 15.68% for the replacement levels of 50, 100 and 200, respectively.
 
For body analysis, the inclusion of enzyme complex SSF improved only the phosphorus retention. The phytase from enzyme complex acted on the phytate present in vegetable ingredients of the diet, releasing phosphorus that was unavailable. The diet with 10% of replacement plus SSF increased the body phosphorus level in 12% when compared the treatment with 10% of replacement. Similar results were verified by Bock et al. (2007) that found higher amount of phosphorus and calcium in the body composition when tilapias were fed with diets contained phytase. These same authors also mentioned that the use of phytase in diets for Nile tilapia in growth phase can reduce levels of inclusion of inorganic phosphorus in feed and minimize environmental impacts. Using phytase in diets, Furuya et al. (2005) observed that tilapias improved the deposition of phosphorus on bone and weight gain in 13.15 and 39.9%, respectively.
 
Therefore, it is concluded that the inclusion of enzyme complex SSF (solid state fermentation) improves the feed conversion and phosphorus retention in Nile tilapias fed with diets containing up to 10% of replacement of crude protein from soya meal to crude protein of crambe meal. 


 CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors have not declared any conflict of interest.


 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Thanks to FAPEMIG, CAPES, CNPq, BNB and Alltech Inc. for their financial support.



 REFERENCES

Bell JM (1993). Factors affecting the nutritional value of canola meal: A review. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 73:679-697.
CrossRef
 
Bock CL, Pezzato LE, Cantelmo OA, Barros MM (2007). Fitase em rações para tilápia do Nilo. Rev. Bras. Zoot. 36:1455-1461.
CrossRef
 
Bomfim MAD, Lanna EAT, Donzele JL, Quadros M, Ribeiro FB, Araújo WAG (2008). Exigências de treonina, com base no conceito de proteína ideal, de alevinos de tilápia-do-nilo. Rev. Bras. Zoot. 37:2077-2084.
CrossRef
 
Botaro D, Furuya WM, Silva LCR (2007). Redução da proteína da dieta com base no conceito de protein ideal para tilápias-do-nilo (Oreochromis niloticus) criadas em tanques-rede. Rev. Bras. Zoot.,36:517-525.
CrossRef
 
Daxenbichler ME, Van Eten CH, Wolf JA (1968). Diastereometric episulfides from epi-progoitrin upon analysis of crambe seed meal. Phytochemistry, 7:989-996.
CrossRef
 
Ferreira FM, Silva ARB (2011). Produtividade de grãos e teor de óleo da cultura do crambe sob diferentes sistemas de manejo de solo em Rondonópolis – MT. Enciclopédia Biosfera, Centro Científico Conhecer, 7:1-11.
 
Furuya WM, Hayashi C, Furuya VRB (2000). Exigências de proteína para alevino revertido de tilápia do Nilo (Oreochromis niloticus). Rev. Bras. Zoot. 29:1912-1917.
 
Furuya WM, Hayashi C, Furuya VRB, Sakaguti, ES, Botaro D, Silva, LCR, Auresco SA (2004). Farelo de soja integral em rações em rações para juvenis de tilápia do Nilo (Oreochromis niloticus). Acta Sci. Anim. Sci. 26:5-13.
CrossRef
 
Furuya WM, Santos VG, Botaro D, Hayashi C, Silva LCR (2005). Níveis de proteína e fitase em rações de terminação para a tilápia do Nilo (Oreocrhomis niloticus). Arq. Ciên. Veter. Zool. 8:11-17.
 
Furuya WM, Santos VG, Silva LCR (2006). Exigência de lisina digestível para juvenis de tilápia do Nilo. Rev. Bras. Zoot. 35:937-942.
CrossRef
 
Gonçalves GS, Furuya WM, Ribeiro RP (2002). Farelo de canola na alimentação do piavuçu, Leporinus macrocephalus (Garavello & Britski,), na fase inicial. Acta Sci. 24:921-925.
 
Gonçalves GS, Pezzato LE, Barros MM, Hisano H, Rosa MJS (2009). Níveis de proteína digestível e energia digestível em dietas para tilápia-do-nilo, formuladas com base no conceito de proteína ideal. Rev. Bras. Zoot. 38:2289-2298.
CrossRef
 
Huang, RC, Okamura H, Iwagawa, AT, Tadera K, Nakatani M, Azedarachin C (1995). A limonoid antifeeding from Melia Azedarachi. Phytochemistry. 38:593-594.
CrossRef
 
Kloss P, Jeffery E, Wallig M, Tumbleson M, Parsons C (1994). Efficacy of feeding glucosinolate-extracted crambe meal to broiler chicks. Poult. Sci. 73:1542-1551.
CrossRef
 
Koroleff F (1976). Determination of nutrients. In: Grasshoff, K. (Ed.). Methods of sea water analysis. Weinheim: Verlag Chemie, pp.117-181.
 
Kubtiza F (2000). Tilápia: tecnologia e planejamento na produção comercial. Acqua Supre Com. Suprim. Aqüicultura Ltda, Jundiaí, Brazil.
 
Lanna EAT, Pezzato LP, Cecon PR, Furuya WM, Bomfim MAD (2004). Digestibilidade aparente e transito intestinal em tilápia do Nilo, Oreochromis niloticus, em função da fibra bruta da dieta. Rev. Bras. Zoot. 33:2186-2192.
CrossRef
 
Ledoux DR, Belyea RL, Wallig MA, Tumbleson ME (1999). Effect of feeding crambe meal upon intake, gain, health and meat quality of broiler chicks. Anim. Feed Sci. Tech. 76:227-240.
CrossRef
 
Lessman KJ, McCastlin BD (1987). Gamma irradiation to inactivate thioglucosidase of crucifers. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 67:237-242.
CrossRef
 
Liu YG, Steg A, Hindle VA (1993). Crambe meal: a review of nutrition, toxity and effect of treatment. Anim. Feed Sci. Tech. 41:133-147.
CrossRef
 
Moura GS, Lanna EAT, Filer K, Falkoski DL, Donzele JL, Oliveira MGA, Rezende ST (2012). Effects of enzyme complex SSF (solid state fermentation) in pellet diets for Nile tilapia. Rev. Bras. Zoot. 41:2139-2143.
CrossRef
 
Mustakas GZ, Kirk LD, Griffin ELJ, Booth AN (1976). Crambe seed processing: removal of glucosinolates by water extraction. Jour. Amer. Oil Chem. Soc, 53:12-16.
CrossRef
 
Oginsky EL, Stein AE, Greer MA (1965). Myrosinase activity in bacteria as demonstrated by the conversion of progoitrin to goitrin. Proceedings of the Society for Exper. Biol. Med. 119:360-364.
CrossRef
PMid:14328890
 
 
Pereira JAA, Kirleys AW, Cline TR (1981). Nutritional evaluation of processed crambe meal. J. Anim. Sci. 53:1278-1285.
 
Pretto A, Silva LP, Neto JR, Nunes LMC, Freitas IL, Loureiro SA (2014). Farelo de crambe nas formas in natura ou reduzida em antinutrientes na dieta do jundiá. Ciênc. Rural 44:692-698.
CrossRef
 
Roscoe R, Richetti A, Maranho E (2007). Análise de viabilidade técnica de oleaginosas para produção de biodiesel em Mato Grosso do Sul. Rev. Pol. Agríc. 16:48-59.
 
Rostagno HS (2011). Tabelas brasileiras para aves e suínos: composição de alimentos e exigências nutricionais. Editora UFV, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
 
Santos EL, Ludke MCMM, Barbosa JM, Rabello CBV, Ludke JV, Winterle WMC, Silva EG (2009). Níveis de farelo de coco em rações para alevinos de tilápia do Nilo. Rev. Bras. Saúde Prod. An. 10: 390-397.
 
Soares CMS, Hayashi C, Faria ACEA, Furuya WM (2001). Substituição da proteína do farelo de soja pela proteína de farelo de canola em dietas para a tilápia do Nilo na fase de crescimento. Rev. Bras. Zootec. 30:1172-1177.
CrossRef
 
Takishita SS, Lanna EAT, Donzele JL, Bomfim MAD, Quadros M, Souza MP (2009). Níveis de lisina digestível em rações para alevinos de tilápia-do-Nilo. Rev. Bras. Zootec. 38:2099-2105.
CrossRef
 
Tani N, Ohtsuru M, Hata T (1974). Isolation of myrosinase producing microorganism. Agricultural. Biol. Chem. 38:1617-1622.
CrossRef
 
Tookey HL, Vanette CH, Daxenbichler ME (1980). Glucosinolates in toxic constituents of plant foodstuffs. Academic Press, New York, United States.
 
Van Etten CH, Daxenbichler ME, Wolff IA (1969). Natural glucosinolates (thioglucosides) in foods and feeds. Agron. Food Chem. 17:483.
CrossRef

 




          */?>