African Journal of
Agricultural Research

  • Abbreviation: Afr. J. Agric. Res.
  • Language: English
  • ISSN: 1991-637X
  • DOI: 10.5897/AJAR
  • Start Year: 2006
  • Published Articles: 6914

Full Length Research Paper

Comparative study on some egg quality traits of exotic chickens in different production systems in East Shewa, Ethiopia

Desalew Tadesse
  • Desalew Tadesse
  • Mekelle University, College of Veterinary Medicine, P. O. Box 231, Mekelle, Ethiopia
  • Search for this author on:
  • Google Scholar
Wondmeneh Esatu
  • Wondmeneh Esatu
  • Debre Zeit Agricultural Research Center, P. O. Box 32, Debre Zeit, Ethiopia.
  • Search for this author on:
  • Google Scholar
Mekonnen Girma
  • Mekonnen Girma
  • International Livestock Research Institute, P.O. Box 5689, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
  • Search for this author on:
  • Google Scholar
Tadelle Dessie
  • Tadelle Dessie
  • International Livestock Research Institute, P.O. Box 5689, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
  • Search for this author on:
  • Google Scholar


  •  Received: 26 November 2013
  •  Accepted: 09 February 2015
  •  Published: 26 February 2015

 ABSTRACT

A total of 227 eggs were collected during summer 2013 from Isa Brown (IB), Bovan Brown (BB) and Potchefstroom Koekoek (PK) chickens for comparative study of internal and external egg quality traits under intensive and village production systems in East Shewa, Ethiopia. The data collected was analyzed using SPSS and significant differences in egg quality traits were compared using post hoc multiple comparisons. Average egg weight, Haugh Unit, shell thickness, yolk colour, albumen weight, yolk percent and yolk to albumin ratio of IB showed a significant difference (p<0.05) under intensive and village production systems. BB showed a statistical significant difference (p<0.05) for egg weight, yolk height, albumen height, yolk colour, Haugh Unit, shell thickness, yolk percent and albumen percent under intensive and village production systems. Further, average yolk height, yolk weight, yolk color, yolk percent and yolk to albumen ratio of PK revealed a significant difference under village and intensive production systems. The study revealed that even though the differences were observed in egg quality traits under intensive and extensive system, eggs produced from village were also found to be good quality.

 

Key words: Egg quality traits, exotic chicken, intensive and village production system.


 INTRODUCTION

Worldwide, 80% of the total chicken populations are found in village poultry production system (Alabi et al., 2006), indicating the importance of village chicken production for the development rural economy. In Ethiopia, total poultry population at country level is estimated to be 50.38 million and with regard to breed, 96.9, 0.54 and 2.56% were reported to be indigenous, hybrid and exotic chickens, respectively (CSA, 2013). From the total population of chicken, 99% are raised under the traditional backyard system of management, while 1% is under intensive management system (Solomon, 2007). The poultry sector can be characterized into village or backyard, small scale and large scale commercial poultry production system (Dawit et al., 2008).
 
Embryo development is dependent on the egg quality traits such as egg weight, yolk and albumen weights, genetic line and age of the hen (Onagbesan et al., 2007), besides egg weight is one of the important phenotypic traits that influence egg quality and reproductive fitness of the chicken (Islam et al., 2001; Farooq et al., 2001). Eggshell thickness is an important trait for hatchability; in which hatchable egg thickness lies between 0.33 and 0.35 mm and few eggs with a shell thickness less than 0.27 mm will hatch (Khan et al., 2004). In addition, marketability of eggs entirely depends on eggshell thickness and strength, as poor eggshell quality results in millions of dollars of loss in USA (Roland, 1988). Even though, it is subjective and varies from country to country, yolk color remains to be key a factor for consumer acceptability (Okeudo et al., 2003). Further, the egg is probably the food item most frequently involved in outbreaks of foodborne infections with Salmonella species as ethiological agent (Gast et al., 2005; Gantois et al., 2009). Several factors affect penetration of the egg by Salmonella species, but the common factors includes the quality of eggshell, albumen and yolk (Messens et al., 2004).
 
With the aim of improving poultry productivity exotic chickens such as Isa Brown (IB), Bovan Brown (BB) and Potchefstroom Koekoek (PK) were distributed to smallholder farmers in Ada’a and Lume districts of East Shewa Zone, Ethiopia (Tadesse et al., 2013). In the layer reference for more than 30 years everywhere in the world, IB is the most efficient layer in the poultry industry producing many high quality eggs and adapts itself to all climates and environments (ISA, 2010). The PK was bred from crosses between the Black Australorp and the White Leghorn in South Africa and is one of the most promising breeds. It is also second to White Leghorn, Fayoumi in terms of hen-housed egg production per hen and hatchability, respectively (Grobbelaar et al., 2010).
 
Despite the benefits of quality eggs, common surveys and previous research works conducted by Tadelle et al. (2003), Moges et al. (2010) and Mengesha et al. (2011) indicated village poultry farmers have low awareness to sort eggs for different purposes such as for hatching, marketing and home consumption purposes. Hence a considerable portion of eggs will be lost because of indiscriminate use of eggs rather than sorting eggs for different purposes. The egg quality could be affected by the production system among others. Thus, comparison between eggs from village and intensive production system would help researchers to suggest possible intervention options to improve quality of eggs in different production systems. Thus, the present study was designed with the objective to compare egg quality traits of three exotic chickens under intensive and village poultry production systems in East Shewa Zone of Oromiya, Ethiopia.Worldwide, 80% of the total chicken populations are found in village poultry production system (Alabi et al., 2006), indicating the importance of village chicken production for the development rural economy. In Ethiopia, total poultry population at country level is estimated to be 50.38 million and with regard to breed, 96.9, 0.54 and 2.56% were reported to be indigenous, hybrid and exotic chickens, respectively (CSA, 2013). From the total population of chicken, 99% are raised under the traditional backyard system of management, while 1% is under intensive management system (Solomon, 2007). The poultry sector can be characterized into village or backyard, small scale and large scale commercial poultry production system (Dawit et al., 2008).
 
Embryo development is dependent on the egg quality traits such as egg weight, yolk and albumen weights, genetic line and age of the hen (Onagbesan et al., 2007), besides egg weight is one of the important phenotypic traits that influence egg quality and reproductive fitness of the chicken (Islam et al., 2001; Farooq et al., 2001). Eggshell thickness is an important trait for hatchability; in which hatchable egg thickness lies between 0.33 and 0.35 mm and few eggs with a shell thickness less than 0.27 mm will hatch (Khan et al., 2004). In addition, marketability of eggs entirely depends on eggshell thickness and strength, as poor eggshell quality results in millions of dollars of loss in USA (Roland, 1988). Even though, it is subjective and varies from country to country, yolk color remains to be key a factor for consumer acceptability (Okeudo et al., 2003). Further, the egg is probably the food item most frequently involved in outbreaks of foodborne infections with Salmonella species as ethiological agent (Gast et al., 2005; Gantois et al., 2009). Several factors affect penetration of the egg by Salmonella species, but the common factors includes the quality of eggshell, albumen and yolk (Messens et al., 2004).
 
With the aim of improving poultry productivity exotic chickens such as Isa Brown (IB), Bovan Brown (BB) and Potchefstroom Koekoek (PK) were distributed to smallholder farmers in Ada’a and Lume districts of East Shewa Zone, Ethiopia (Tadesse et al., 2013). In the layer reference for more than 30 years everywhere in the world, IB is the most efficient layer in the poultry industry producing many high quality eggs and adapts itself to all climates and environments (ISA, 2010). The PK was bred from crosses between the Black Australorp and the White Leghorn in South Africa and is one of the most promising breeds. It is also second to White Leghorn, Fayoumi in terms of hen-housed egg production per hen and hatchability, respectively (Grobbelaar et al., 2010).
 
Despite the benefits of quality eggs, common surveys and previous research works conducted by Tadelle et al. (2003), Moges et al. (2010) and Mengesha et al. (2011) indicated village poultry farmers have low awareness to sort eggs for different purposes such as for hatching, marketing and home consumption purposes. Hence a considerable portion of eggs will be lost because of indiscriminate use of eggs rather than sorting eggs for different purposes. The egg quality could be affected by the production system among others. Thus, comparison between eggs from village and intensive production system would help researchers to suggest possible intervention options to improve quality of eggs in different production systems. Thus, the present study was designed with the objective to compare egg quality traits of three exotic chickens under intensive and village poultry production systems in East Shewa Zone of Oromiya, Ethiopia.


 MATERIALS AND METHODS

Management of chickens
Under village production system, more than 90% of farmers provided separate housing for their chicken in Lume and Ada’a districts.  Chickens   scavenge   feed   materials   such   as  kitchen wastes, insects, worms and agricultural leftovers. Maize and wheat were provided three times a day (morning, noon and evening) in addition to the normal scavenging by 95% farmers in both districts. Similarly, water was provided as free access by more than 96% of the farmers in both districts. Under intensive system, the housing management was based on semi-opened deep litter system, fed on commercial balanced ration and with standard feeder and watering facility in both private and government poultry farms sampled.
Egg sample collection and evaluation
From village production system, a total of 137 fresh eggs (57 from IB, 56 from BB and 24 from PK) were collected from adult laying hens from six Peasant Associations (PA’s) (Momoshoki, Byobiskie and Jogogudedo) in Lume and  (Denkaka, Kurkuradenbi and Godino) in Ada’a districts for egg quality evaluation. Further, under intensive production system a total of 90 freshly laid eggs from three breeds (30 from each) were collected from two privately owned farms for IB and BB and from a government owned intensive farm for PK. A total 227 eggs were collected from both production systems for evaluation of internal and external egg quality traits at Debre Zeit Agricultural Research Institute (DZARC) laboratory.


 DATA COLLECTION

External egg quality traits such as egg weight were measured using digital balance (g) and shell thickness (mm) using an electronic Digital Caliper (Mitutoyo, Japan). The shell thickness was measured at three different points in the equatorial shell and the calculated average of the three was taken as a trait. To determine the internal egg quality traits, eggs were broken onto a flat surface. The thick albumen height (AH) was measured at its widest part at a position half way between the yolk and the outer margin. Yolk height was measured using Tripod Micrometer (TSS, England). The yolks were carefully separated from the albumen. Albumen and yolk weight were determined by weighing with electronic sensitive balance (Sartorius, Germany) separately. The yolk colour was determined using the Roche Colour Fan (Printed in Switzerland); a standard colorimetric system ranged from 1 to 15. Individual Haugh Units (HU) were calculated from the two parameters; height of albumen (AH) and egg weight (EW) using the formula:
HU=100log (AH–1.7 EW0.37 + 7.6)
Where HU=Haugh Unit, AH=Albumen height and EW=Egg weight (Haugh, 1937).
The albumen ratio (AR) and the yolk ratios (YR) were calculated as follows:
Yolk percent= (weight of yolk/weight of whole egg) × 100
Albumen percent= (weight of albumen/weight of the whole egg) × 100.
Data management and analysis
 
The data were entered into Microsoft Excel spreadsheet and analyzed using SPSS (Version, 17). To examine the significant differences among egg quality traits, post hoc multiple comparisons were done using means generated from one-way ANOVA.


 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Egg weight
 
It is one of the important phenotypic traits that   influence egg quality and reproductive fitness of the chicken parents (Islam et al., 2001). The analysis for average egg weight (g) revealed that (64.78, 58.9), (63.46, 59.32) and (47.79, 47.53) under intensive and village production systems for IB, BB and PK layer chickens, respectively (Table 1). Average egg weight of IB and BB under intensive system was significantly higher than under village production system (p<0.05), such difference is not a surprise since IB and BB are commercial strains developed for egg weight improvement (Hocking et al., 2003). However, there was no significant difference for PK under intensive and village production systems; this could indicate that PK breed could perform comparatively under village production systems, as it is also an indigenous African chicken (Grobbelaar et al., 2010).
 
 
Shell thickness
The analysis for egg shell thickness revealed that (0.34, 0.31), (0.35, 0.33) and (0.29, 0.29) mm for IB, BB and PK under intensive and village production systems, respectively (Table 1).
The average egg shell thickness of IB and BB under intensive production system was significantly higher (p<0.05) than under village production systems (P<0.05) and agreed with the reports of Tulin and Ahmet (2009) and Dorji (2013). However, the average egg shell thickness of PK did not differ significantly under intensive and village production system.
Yolk height
The analysis for yolk height (mm) revealed that (17.81, 17.35), (18.57, 18.11) and (17.59, 18.80) for IB, BB and PK under intensive and village production systems, respectively. Similar average yolk height was reported for IB under village production system by Tadesse et al. (2013). The average yolk height of BB was a significantly higher (p<0.05) in intensive than under village production system. However, the average yolk value of PK under village production system significantly higher (p<0.05) than intensive production system. In the present study, the yolk height recorded under intensive and village production was comparable to those reported in intensive system in northern Ethiopia by Niraj et al. (2014), but significantly higher than the report of Aberra et al. (2013) in different agro-ecology of Ethiopia for indigenous chickens under village production system.
Albumen height
The mean albumen heights were (6.17, 6.34), (9.51, 6.92) and (5.53, 5.54) g for IB, BB and PK under intensive and village production systems, respectively (Table 2). The mean albumen height of BB under intensive system was significantly higher under village production system (p<0.05). However, albumen height of IB and PK breeds did not differ significantly in intensive and village production systems. Under village production system, comparable average albumen height was reported by Tadesse et al. (2013) for IB and PK breeds in East Shewa, Ethiopia. But, the present average albumen height recorded was significantly lower than the report of Niraj et al. (2014) under intensive management in northern Ethiopia.
 
 
Yolk weight
 
As presented in Table 2, there was no significant statistical difference in yolk weight for IB and BB; this is in agreement with the report of Tulin and Ahmet (2009) for eggs collected under village production system. The mean yolk weight recorded in the present study was comparable to the report of Tadesse et al. (2013), but significantly lower than the report of Niraj et al. (2014) under intensive management for Rohde Island Red breed. Further, in the current study, the average yolk weight of PK recorded under village was significantly higher (p<0.05) than intensive production system; this might suggest the capability of PK to perform well for better yolk weight at village level (Grobbelaar et al., 2010).
Yolk color
In the  present study, the yolk color of eggs collected from IB, BB and PK under village production system had a deep yellow colour (~8 to 12) than that of collected under intensive system (~6 to 10) (Table 2), indicating yolk colour is a function of feed not breeds (Demeke, 2004). Village chicken roaming near the backyard could get enough the xanthophyl (plant pigment) content of the diet consumed, which determines the yolk colour (Silversides and Scott 2006). Green grass during scavenging might be responsible for carotenoid deposits in the yolk, which improves the yolk color. Ethiopian consumers have a strong preference for eggs with deep yellow yolk colour. Very small sized eggs from the scavenging local chicken with deep yellow yolk colour fetch much higher prices compared to larger eggs of improved strains with pale yolk (Tadelle et al., 2003).
 
Albumen weight
 
Albumen weight had more closely associated with egg weight than yolk weight (Harms and Hussein, 1993).The analysis for albumen weight (g) revealed that (37.23, 33.19), (35.98, 34.54) and (26.07, 25.14) for IB, BB and PK under intensive and village production system, respectively (Table 2). In the current study, the average albumen weight of IB under intensive system was significantly higher than under village production system (P<0.05). However, albumen weight of BB and PK did not differ under intensive and village production system. The current albumen weight recorded under village and intensive system for IB and BB was higher than the report of Niraj et al. (2014) in Ethiopia and comparable with the report of Kabir et al. (2014) in Nigeria under intensive management.
 
Haugh Unit
 
The Haugh Unit (HU) is calculated from the height of the inner thick albumen and the weight of an egg and it is considered to be a typical measure of albumen quality (Haugh, 1937). In the present study, the average HU value were (85.34, 77.56), (87.45, 79.26) and (78.38, 77.26) for IB, BB and PK under intensive and village production system, respectively (Table 2). It is generally accepted that the higher the HU value, the better the quality of the eggs. Study has shown in UK that there is consumer resistant to purchase eggs which have HU’s below 60 and the minimum acceptable level of 70 HU on regular documented tests (TSS, 1999). The average HU of IB and BB under intensive production was significantly higher than that in under village production system (p<0.05). The average HU recorded for IB and BB in the current study was significantly higher than the report of Niraj et al. (2014) under intensive management for Rohde Island Red and Bovans white breeds in northern Ethiopia. The current finding disagreed with Tulin and Ahmet (2009) and Dorji (2013), who reported no significant difference in HU for eggs collected from village and intensive production systems.
 
Albumen and yolk percent
 
The results of albumen and yolk percent are presented in Table 2. The mean yolk percent were (25.44, 27.79), (24.45, 26.63) and (30.55, 33.22) for IB, BB and PK under intensive and village production systems, respectively (Table 2). In the present study, the yolk percent of IB, BB and PK under village production system was significantly higher than under intensive system (p<0.05) and this was in agreement with the finding of Dorji (2013). As presented in Table 2, the albumen percent were (56.48, 56.28), (56.85, 57.05) and (54.66, 53.07) for IB, BB and PK under intensive and village production systems, respectively. In the current study, the albumen percent of IB, BB, and PK did not differ significantly under intensive and village production system and this was disagreed with the comparative egg quality study of Dorji (2013) in under intensive and village production systems.
 
Yolk to albumen ratio
 
The yolk albumen ratio in the present study revealed that (0.45, 0.50), (0.43, 0.47) and (0.56, 0.64) for IB, BB and PK under intensive and village production systems, respectively (Table 2). The yolk to albumen ratio of IB and PK under village production system was a significantly higher than under intensive production system (p<0.05), while the yolk : albumen ratio of  BB did not differ significantly. It was reported that there was a small positive relationship between egg weight and yolk albumen ratio was found (Harms and Hussein, 1993). Higher yolk to albumen ratio is an attribute to differences more in proportion of albumen than in proportion of yolk (Suk and Park, 2001). However, the yolk albumen ratio of IB in both production systems in the present study was significantly higher than the report Suk and Park (2001) and Harms and Hussein (1993) under intensive management.
 
 
 
 

 


 CONCLUSION

In the current study, even though the differences were observed in egg quality traits under intensive and extensive system, eggs collected from the village were also found to be good quality, which are normally perceived as inferior quality by consumers. This could indicate the efforts of farmers to apply improved management in housing, feeding and health management provided by agricultural extension works in the study areas.


 CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors have not declared any conflict of interest.


 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors are greatly indebted to the Koepon Stichting, Wageningen University (WU), Institute of Agricultural Research (EIAR) and International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI) for funding this research work and the farming communities from two of the districts for providing eggs for quality analysis which is instrumental for the successful completion of this research work.



 REFERENCES

Ahmed R, Uddin MB, Khan ASA, Mukul SA, Hossain MK (2007). Allelopathic effects of Lantana camera on germination and growth behavoiur of some agricultural crops in Bangladesh, J. For. Res. 18(4):301-304.
Crossref
 
Akemo MC, Regnier EE, Bennett MA (2000). Weed suppression in spring-sown rye (Secale cereale)-pea (Pisum sativum) cover crop mixes. Weed Technol. 14:545–549.
Crossref
 
Anjum T, Bajwa R (2007a) Field appraisal of herbicide potential of sunflower leaf extract against Rumex dentatus, Field Crops Res. 100:139–142.
Crossref
 
Anjum T, Bajwa R (2007b). The effect of sunflower leaf extracts on Chenopodium album in wheat fields in Pakistan, Crop Prot. 26:1390–1394.
Crossref
 
Babu RC, Kandasamy OS (1997). Allelopathic effect of Eucalyptus globulus Labill. on Cyperus rotundus L. and Cynodon dactylon L. Pers, J. Agron. Crop Sci. 179:123–126.
Crossref
 
Baerson SR, Dayan FE, Rimando AM, Nanayakkara NPD, Liu CJ, Schöder J, Fishbein M, Pan Z, Kagan IA, Pratt LH, Cordonnier- Pratt MM, Duke SO (2008). A functional genomics investigation of allelochemical biosynthesis in Sorghum bicolor root hairs, J. Biol. Chem. 283:3231–3247.
Crossref
 
Barnes JP, Putnam AR (1983). Rye residues contribute to weed suppression in no-tillage cropping systems. J. Chem. Ecol. 9:1045–1057.
Crossref
 
Belz RG (2007). Allelopathy in crop/weed interactions - an update. Pest Manage. Sci. 63:308–326.
Crossref
 
Ben-Hammouda M, Ghorbal H, Kremer RJ, Oueslati O (2001). Allelopathic effects of barley extracts on germination and seedlings growth of bread and durum wheats. Agronomie 21:65–71.
Crossref
 
Bertholdsson NO (2005). Early vigour and allelopathy - two useful traits for enhanced barley and wheat competitiveness against weeds. Weed Res. 45:94–102.
Crossref
 
Bertin C, Yang X, Weston LA (2003). The role of root exudates and allelochemicals in the rhizosphere. Plant Soil 256:67–83.
Crossref
 
Bhinu VS, Narasimhan K, Swarup S (2006). Plant natural products in the rhizosphere, in: Cseke L.J., Kirakosyan A., Kaufman P.B., Warber S., Duke J.A., Brielmann H. (Eds.), Natural products from plants. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL. pp. 143–164.
Crossref
 
Bhowmik PC, Inderjit (2003). Challenges and opportunities in implementing allelopathy for natural weed management. Crop Prot. 22:661–671.
Crossref
 
Bogatek R, Gniazdowska A, Zakrzewska W, Orac K, Gawronski SW (2006). Allelopathic effects of sunflower extracts on mustard seed germination and seedling growth. Biol. Plant 50:156–158.
Crossref
 
Burgos NR, Talbert RE, Kim KS, Kuk YI (2004). Growth inhibition and root ultrastruture of Cucumber seedlings exposed to allelochemicals from rye (Secale cereale). J. Chem. Ecol. 30:671–689.
Crossref
 
Callaway RM, Ridenour WM (2004). Novel weapons: invasive success and the evolution of increased competitive ability. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2:436–443.
Crossref
 
Cheema ZA (1988). Weed control in wheat through sorghum allelochemicals, Ph.D. thesis, Agronomy Department, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan.
 
Cheema ZA, Khaliq A (2000). Use of sorghum allelopathic properties to control weeds in irrigated wheat in a semi arid region of Punjab, Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 79:105-112.
Crossref
 
Chon SU, Jennings JA, Nelson CJ (2006). Alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) autotoxicity: Current status. Allelopathy J. 18:57–80.
 
Chung IM, Kim KH, Ahn JK, Lee SB, Kim SH, Hahn SJ (2003). Comparison of Allelopathic Potential of Rice Leaves, Straw, and Hull Extracts on Barnyardgrass. Agron. J. 95:1063-1070.
Crossref
 
Cseke LJ, Kaufman PB (2006). Regulation of metabolite synthesis in plants. Nat. Prod. Plants pp. 101-141.
 
Czarnota MA, Paul RN, Dayan FE, Nimbal CI, Weston LA (2001). Mode of action, localization of production, chemical nature, and activity of sorgoleone: A potent PSII inhibitor in Sorghum spp. Root exudates. Weed Technol. 15:813–825.
Crossref
 
Czarnota MA, Paul RN, Weston LA, Duke SO (2003a). Anatomy of sorgoleone-secreting root hairs of Sorghum species. Int. J. Plant Sci. 164:861–866.
Crossref
 
Czarnota MA, Rimando AM,Weston LA (2003b). Evaluation of seven sorghum (Sorghum sp.) accessions, J. Chem. Ecol. 29:2073–2083.
Crossref
 
D'Abrosca B, DellaGreca M, Fiorentino A, Monaco P, Previtera L, Simonet AM, Zarrelli A (2001). Potential allelochemicals from Sambucus nigra. Phytochemistry 58:1073–1081.
Crossref
 
Dayan FE, Kagan IA, Rimando AM (2003). Elucidation of the biosynthetic pathway of the allelochemical sorgoleone using retrobiosynthetic NMR analysis. J. Biol. Chem. 278:28607–28611.
Crossref
 
Dayan FE, Watson SB, Nanayakkara NPD (2007). Biosynthesis of lipid resorcinols and benzoquinones in isolated secretory plant root hairs. J. Exp. Bot. 58:3263–3272.
Crossref
 
De la Fuente JR, Uriburu ML, Burton G, Sosa VE (2000). Sesquiterpene lactone variability in Parthenium hysterophorus L. Phytochemistry 55:769–772.
Crossref
 
Dhima K, Vasilakoglou I, Lithourgidi A, Mecolari E, Keco R, Agolli XH, Eleftherohorinos I (2008). Phytotoxicity of 10 winter barley varieties and their competitive ability against common poppy and ivy-leaved speedwell. Exp. Agric. 4:385–397.
 
Ding J, Sun Y, Xiao CL, Shi K, Zhou YH, Yu JQ (2007). Physiological basis of different allelopathic reactions of cucumber and figleaf gourd plants to cinnamic acid. J. Exp. Bot. 58:3765-3773.
Crossref
 
Dudai N, Poljakoff-Mayber A, Mayer AM, Putievsky E, Lerner HR (1999). Essential oils as allelochemicals and their potential use as bioherbicides. J. Chem. Ecol. 25:1079–1089.
Crossref
 
Duke JA, Brielmann H (Eds.), Natural products from plants, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL. pp. 101–141.
 
Duke SO (2003). Weeding with transgenes, Trends Biotechnol. 21:192– 195.
Crossref
 
Duke SO, Baerson SR, Rimando AM, Pan Z, Dayan FE, Belz RG (2007). Biocontrol of weeds with allelopathy: Conventional and transgenic approaches, in: Vurro M., Gressel J. (Eds.), Novel biotechnologies for biocontrol agent enhancement and management, Springer. Netherlands pp. 75–85.
Crossref
 
Duke SO, Romagni JG, Dayan FE (2000). Natural products as sources for new mechanisms of herbicidal action. Crop Prot. 19:583–589.
Crossref
 
Duke SO, Scheffler BE, Dayan FE, Weston LA, Ota E (2001). Strategies for using transgenes to produce allelopathic crops. Weed Technol. 15:826–834.
Crossref
 
Einhellig FA (1996). Interactions involving allelopathy in cropping systems, Agron. J. 88:886 893.
Crossref
 
Einhellig FA, Souza IF (1992). Phytotoxicity of sorgoleone found in grain sorghum root exudates. J. Chem. Ecol. 18:1–11.
Crossref
 
El-Rokiek KG, Eid RA (2009). Allelopathic effects of Eucalyptus citriodora on amaryllis and associated grassy weed. Planta Daninha 27:887–899.
Crossref
 
Fenwick GR, Heaney, RK, Mullin, WJ, (1983). Glucosinolates and their breakdown products in food and food plants. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 18:123–301.
Crossref
 
Frey M, Chomet P, Glawischnig E, Stettner C, Grün S, Winklmair A, Wolfgang E, Bacher A, Meeley RB, Briggs SP, Simcox K, Gierl A (1997). Analysis of a chemical plant defense mechanism in grasses. Science 277: 696–699.
Crossref
 
Fujii Y (1994). Screening of allelopathic candidates by new specific discrimination, and assessment methods for allelopathy, and the identification of l-dopa as the allelopathic substance from the most promising velvetbean (Mucuna pruriens). Bull. Natl. Inst. Agro-Environ. Sci. 10:115–218.
 
Furness NH, Adomas B, Dai Q, Li S, Upadhyaya MK (2008). Allelopathic influence of Houndstongue (Cynoglossum officinale) and its modification by UV-B radiation. Weed Technol. 22:101-107.
Crossref
 
Gatti AB, Perez SC, Lima MIS (2004). Atividade alelopática de extratos aquosos de Aristolochia esperanzae O. Kuntze na germinação e no crescimento de Lactuca sativa L. e Raphanus sativus L. Acta Bot. Bras. 18:459–472.
Crossref
 
Gimsing AL, Blæum J, Dayan FE, Locke MA, Sejero LH, Jacobsen CS (2009). Mineralization of the allelochemical sorgoleone in soil. Chemosphere 76:1041–1047.
Crossref
 
Golisz A, Ciarka D, Gawronski SW (2002). Allelopathy activity of buckwheat –Fagopyrum esculentum Moench. In: Fujii Y, Hidarate S, Araya H, eds. Proceedings III World Congress on Allelopathy, Sato Printing Company Limited, Tsukuba City, Ibaraki, Japan. P. 161.
 
Gu Y, Wang P, Kong CH (2008). Effects of rice allelochemicals on the microbial community of flooded paddy soil, Allelopathy J. 22:299-309.
 
Aberra M, Worku Z, Teklegiorgis Y (2013). Assessment of the prevailing handling and quality of eggs from scavenging indigenous chickens reared in different agro-ecological zones of Ethiopia. J. Environ. Occup. Sci. 2(1):1-8.
Crossref
 
Alabi RA, Esobhawan AO, Aruna MB (2006). Econometric determination of contribution of family poultry to women's in Niger –Delta, Nigeria. J. Central. Eur. Agric.7:753-760.
 
CSA (Central Statistical Agency) (2013). Agricultural sample survey. Report on livestock and livestock characteristics 2012/13 report. The Federal Democratic republic of Ethiopia, Private Peasant Holdings. Statistical Bulletin Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, April, 2013. P. 570.
 
Dawit A, Tamrat D, Stotaw F, Nzietcheung S, Roy D (2008). Overview and background paper on Ethiopia's poultry sector. Relevance for HPAI Research in Ethiopia. www.hpai-reserach net. Accessed 06 April 2014.
 
Demeke S (2004). Egg production performance of local and White Leghorn hens under intensive and rural household conditions in Ethiopia. Lives. Res. for Rural Dev. 16:9.
 
Dorji N (2013). Comparative study of the egg quality of Bhutanese indigenous strains reared under different production systems. Bang. J. Anim. Sci. 42(2):175-178.
Crossref
 
Farooq M, Mian M, Ali M, Durranim F, Asquar A, Muqarrab A (2001). Egg traits of Fayoumi bird under subtropical conditions. Sarad. J. Agri. 17:141-145.
 
Gantois I, Ducatelle R, Pasmans F, Haesebrouck F, Gast R, Humphrey TJ, Van Immerseel F (2009). Mechanisms of egg contamination by Salmonella Enteritidis. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 33:718-738.
Crossref
 
Gast RK, Holt PS, Murase T (2005). Penetration of Salmonella enteritidis and Salmonella Heidelberg into egg yolks in an in vitro contamination model. Poult. Sci. 84:621-625.
Crossref
 
Grobbelaar J, Sutherland B, Molalakgotla N (2010). Egg production potentials of certain indigenous chicken breeds from South Africa.Anim. Genet. Resour. 46:25-32.
Crossref
 
 
Harms RH, Hussein SM (1993). Variations in yolk: albumen ratio in hen eggs from commercial flocks. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 2:166-170.
Crossref
 
Haugh R (1937). The Haugh unit of measuring egg quality. US egg Poult. Magazine 43:552-555.
 
Hocking P, Bain M, Channing C, Fleming R, Wilson S (2003). Genetic variation for egg production, egg quality and bone strength in selected and traditional breeds of laying fowl. Br. Poult. Sci. 44:365-373.
Crossref
 
ISA (Hendrix Company) (2010). Product performance of Isa Brown Commercial layer. 
 
Islam M, Bulbul S, Seeland G, Islam A (2001). Egg quality of different chicken genotypes in summer and winter. Pak. J. Biol. Sci. 4:1411-1414.
Crossref
 
Kabir M, Sulaiman RO, Idris RK, Abdu SB, Daudu OM, Yashim SM, Hassan MR, Adamu HY, Eche NM, Olugbemi TS, Adedibu (2014). Effects of Strain, Age and the Interrelationships between External and Internal Qualities of Eggs in Two Strains of Layer Chickens in Northern Guinea Savannah Zone of Nigeria. Iran. J. Appl. An. Sci. 4(1):179-184.
 
Khan M, Khatun M, Kibria A (2004). Study the quality of eggs of different genotypes of chicken under scavenging system at Bangladesh. Pak. J. Biol. Sci. 7(12):2163-2166.
Crossref
 
Mengesha M, Tamir B, Dessie T (2011). Village Chicken Constraints and Traditional Management Practices in Jamma District, South Wollo, Ethiopia. Lives. Res. Rural Dev. 23:37. 
 
Messens W, Duboccage L, Grijspeerdt K, Heyndrickx M, Herman L (2004). Growth of Salmonella serovars in hens' egg albumen as affected by storage prior to inoculation. Food Microbiol. 21:25-32.
Crossref
 
Moges F, Aberra M, Tadelle D (2010). Assessment of village chicken production system and evaluation of the productive and reproductive performance of local chicken ecotype in Bure district, North West Ethiopia. Afr. J. Agri. Res. 5(13):1739-1748.
 
Niraj K, Zinabu N, Yohanes T, Etsay K (2014). Evaluation of egg quality traits of Rhode Island Red and Bovans White under Intensive Management in Mekelle, Ethiopia. IOSR J. Agric. Vet. Sci. 7(2):71-75.
Crossref
 
Okeudo N, Onwuchekwa C, Okoli I (2003). Effect of oil treatment and length of storage on the internal quality, organoleptic attributes and microbial profile of chicken eggs. Trop. Anim. Prod. 6:63-70.
 
Onagbesan O, Bruggeman V, Desmit L, Debonne M., Witters A, Tona K, Everaert N, Decuypere E (2007). Gas exchange during storage and incubation of avian eggs: Effects on embryogenesis, hatchability, chick quality and post-hatch growth. World's Poult. Sci. J. 63:557-573.
Crossref
 
Roland D (1988). Eggshell problems: Estimates of incidence and economic impact. Poult. Sci. 67:1801-1803.
Crossref
 
Silversides F, Scott T (2001). Effect of storage and layer age on quality of eggs from two lines of hens. Poult. Sci. 80:1240-1245.
Crossref
 
Solomon D (2007). Comparative nutritive value and protein qualities of Atella and industrial brewers grains in poultry ration in Ethiopia. Livestock Research for rural Development. The International Journal for Research into Sustainable Developing World Agriculture. CIPAV, Cali, Colombia.
 
Suk YO, Park C (2001). Effect of breed and age of hens on the yolk to albumen ratio in two different genetic stocks. Poult. Sci. 80:855–858.
Crossref
 
Tadelle D, Kijora C, Peters K, (2003). Indigenous chicken ecotypes in Ethiopia: growth and feed utilization potentials. Int. J. Poult. Sci. 2:144-152.
Crossref
 
Tadesse D, Harpal S, Ashenafi M, Wondimeneh E, Tadelle D (2013). Study on productive performances and egg quality traits of exotic chickens under village production system in East Shewa, Ethiopia, 11 April, 2013. Afr. J. Agric. Res. 8(13):1123-1128.
 
TSS (Technical Services and Supplies) (1999). Technical Services and Supplies, QCD instrument Range Manual. York, England, Version 2.1- Release 27E7.
 
Tulin C, Ahmet K (2009). Comparison of village eggs and commercial eggs in terms of quality. J. An. Vet. Adv. 8:2542-2545.

 




Copyright © 2025 Author(s) retain the copyright of this article.

This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0

Back to Vol. 10 No. 9
Back to articles
SUBSCRIBE TO RSS
SUBMIT MANUSCRIPT
CONFERENCES
          */?>