Barbados gooseberry (Pereskia aculeata Miller) is an unconventional food plant found throughout Brazil, rich in protein and antioxidant compounds. This plant is a cactus that, in addition to the true leaves used for human consumption, also produces honey flowers and edible fruits, considered important for feeding birds and frugivorous mammals. Barbados gooseberry is traditionally used as a medicinal plant in some regions of Brazil, and scientific research has increasingly attested to the therapeutic potential of the leaves (de Carvalho et al., 2019).

Due to its adaptability to different climates, Barbados gooseberry is a suitable option for cultivation; it is easy to propagate, has fast growth with a low incidence of pests and diseases, and adaptability  to  different  types  of  soil and climate (Tofanelli and Resende, 2011). The production of Barbados gooseberry can be maximized since the responses of plants to factors that influence its growth and development are known. Currently, scientific studies on its cultivation are still scarce due to insufficient information about adequate soil conditions.

Therefore, crop production techniques that maximize yield and rationalize the use of natural resources are increasingly being adopted (Almeida et al., 2015). In this sense, the use of different soil covers can make the environment favorable for plant development. Several types of coverings are used in agriculture; they can be organic or inorganic, including plastic covering used in other crops such as vegetables already presents great benefits for the  development, growth, and  production  of vegetables (Mendonça et al., 2021). Cover crops have been vastly used in the no-tillage system in large crops such as soybeans and corn (Vieira et al., 2020).

The implementation of leguminous cover crops can present the advantages of obtaining nitrogen from the atmosphere and inhibit the emergence of invasive plants that can be very harmful in the early stages of crop development. They compete directly for water, light, and nutrients (Resende et al., 2020). This study aimed to evaluate the agronomic development of Barbados gooseberry plants on different soil covers.

The experiment was conducted under field conditions in the Horticulture Sector of the School of Agronomy of the Federal University of Goiás (latitude 16°35'12" S, longitude 49°21'14" W and 730 m of altitude). According to the Koppen climatological classification, the region's climate is Aw-type, tropical savannah with a potential water deficit between June and August and global solar irradiance significantly increasing between September and October (Santana, 2015).

Soil analysis was carried out in the 0-20 cm soil layer, whose physicochemical characteristics were pH_(CaCl2): 6.0, P_(Mehlich): 85.0 mg dm^-3, K: 60.0 mg dm^-3, Ca: 3.9 cmol dm^-3, Mg: 1.2 cmol dm^-3, Al: 0.0 cmol dm^-3, H+Al: 2.2 cmol dm^-3, organic matter: 18.0 g dm^-3. Also, the soil had 46% of clay, 44% of sand, and 10% of silt. Soil preparation was carried out in a conventional tillage system, with two operations with a plow, followed by the distribution of dolomitic limestone (ECCE: 100%) with a subsequent operation with a disc harrow.

The fertilization recommendations were carried out according to the requirements of the Barbados gooseberry crop (Madeira et al., 2016). The fertilization in the transplanting was carried out with an NPK  formulation. The   fertilizer   04-30-10   (NPK)    and   granular potassium chloride were used. The topdressing fertilization was carried out via fertigation.

The experimental design was randomized blocks with four treatments and six replications. The treatments consisted of different soil covers, including green cover (forage peanut), straw (sun hemp and millet straw), white plastic cover, and no cover with hoeing. The Barbados gooseberry seedlings were grown in a greenhouse. Cuttings (10 cm) were collected and remained in a substrate for 60 days, being transplanted after an acclimatization period. For the formation of soil over, the species Pennisetum americanum L. (millet) and Crotalaria juncea (sun hemp) were used, both being manually mowed fifteen days before transplanting the Barbados gooseberry seedlings.

Forage peanut was used as the green cover treatment. It was sown 60 days before transplanting the Barbados gooseberry seedlings. In the treatment without cover, the removal of weeds was carried out weekly through hoeing. White-colored mulching was used in the treatment with plastic covering, installed 60 days before transplanting the seedlings. During the crop development cycle, there was no need to apply pesticides. The growth analyses were performed weekly after transplanting the seedlings for four consecutive weeks. Plant height (PH) was evaluated with a graduated ruler. The number of leaves (NL) was assessed by counting. Stem diameter (ST) was evaluated with a caliper. The production of green mass (GM) was assessed on the first cut, which occurred 60 days after transplanting.

Four evaluations of plant height, number of leaves, and stem diameter were taken after transplanting, at 7, 14, 21, and 28 days after transplanting (DAT). As shown in Figures 1 and 2, it was observed that the different soil covers influenced the plant height and number of leaves only at 21 and 28 DAT. At 21 DAT, plants of Barbados gooseberry on the  green  cover  had  lower  plant  height and a smaller number of leaves than the other treatments. This result may have happened due to nutrient competition (Borges, 2016) between the green cover (forage peanut) and Barbados gooseberry plants. At 28 days after transplanting, it was observed that the straw and white plastic covering treatments provided the highest plant height and number of leaves. In contrast, no cover and green cover have the lowest plant height and number of leaves. This may have been due to the direct incidence of sunlight on the soil, raising temperatures (Gastl et al., 2021), and providing greater water evaporation  from   the   soil,  unlike  other  covers  where temperatures were observed that temperatures did not rise during the hottest times of the day. Regarding the green cover treatment, it is believed that the competition for nutrients in this initial phase was responsible for the lower plant heights since the soil temperature was similar to the other treatments. Regarding stem diameter, no difference was observed among the treatments (green cover, without cover/hoeing, straw, and plastic cover) as shown in Figure 3, with of the plants.

In the end, at 60 days after transplanting, the first cut was performed, all leaves were collected, and the green mass per plant was  evaluated. It  was observed  that  the treatments with white plastic cover and straw allowed greater production of green mass followed by no cover and green cover (Figure 4). With fewer leaves and lower plant height, the production of photo assimilates ends up being restricted, which directly reflects on yield.

Treatments with white plastic covering and straw (straw from sun hemp and millet) provided better results than the other treatments, allowing greater agronomic performance, evidenced by greater plant height, the number of leaves, and consequently higher plant biomass yield.

The authors have not declared any conflict of interests.