African Journal of
Agricultural Research

  • Abbreviation: Afr. J. Agric. Res.
  • Language: English
  • ISSN: 1991-637X
  • DOI: 10.5897/AJAR
  • Start Year: 2006
  • Published Articles: 6650

Full Length Research Paper

Stability and genetic divergence study of single cross hybrids in maize (Zea mays L.)

Praveen Singh
  • Praveen Singh
  • Maize Breeding Research Sub-Station (SKUAST-J), Poonch (J&K)-185101, India.
  • Google Scholar
S. K. Salgotra
  • S. K. Salgotra
  • Krishi Vigyan Kendra, SKUAST-J, Poonch (J&K), India.
  • Google Scholar
A. K. Singh
  • A. K. Singh
  • Maize Breeding Research Sub-Station (SKUAST-J), Poonch (J&K)-185101, India.
  • Google Scholar
M. Sharma
  • M. Sharma
  • Maize Breeding Research Sub-Station (SKUAST-J), Poonch (J&K)-185101, India.
  • Google Scholar
A. Gupta
  • A. Gupta
  • Krishi Vigyan Kendra, SKUAST-J, Poonch (J&K), India.
  • Google Scholar
Praveen Singh*
  • Praveen Singh*
  • Maize Breeding Research Sub-Station (SKUAST-J), Poonch (J&K)-185101, India.
  • Google Scholar
Sanjeev Kumar Salgotra
  • Sanjeev Kumar Salgotra
  • Krishi Vigyan Kendra, SKUAST-J, Poonch (J&K), India.
  • Google Scholar
Amit Kumar Singh
  • Amit Kumar Singh
  • Maize Breeding Research Sub-Station (SKUAST-J), Poonch (J&K)-185101, India.
  • Google Scholar
Magdeshwar Sharma
  • Magdeshwar Sharma
  • Maize Breeding Research Sub-Station (SKUAST-J), Poonch (J&K)-185101, India.
  • Google Scholar
Ajay Gupta
  • Ajay Gupta
  • Krishi Vigyan Kendra, SKUAST-J, Poonch (J&K), India.
  • Google Scholar
Muneeshwar Sharma
  • Muneeshwar Sharma
  • Maize Breeding Research Sub-Station (SKUAST-J), Poonch (J&K)-185101, India.
  • Google Scholar


  •  Received: 29 June 2013
  •  Accepted: 16 July 2015
  •  Published: 30 July 2015

 ABSTRACT

A study of stability and genetic divergence was carried out on 22 experimental maize hybrids for 3 years, at the Maize Breeding Research Station, Poonch, India, to evaluate potential crosses particularly for double cross hybrid with a view that well developed single cross hybrids represent an interesting potential base population for double cross hybrid, as they have high and stable yield and desirable agronomic characteristics, with large proportions of favourable loci previously selected. Considering the estimation of stability and genetic diversity together in the present investigation, both directional crosses based on most diverse and stable parents namely PHM 10 x PHM 23, PHM 10 x 35 and PHM 10 x PHM 31 may be recommended which can throw out superior segregants in hybridization.

 

Key words: Maize hybrid, stability, genetic divergence.


 INTRODUCTION

Stability of the genetic divergence genotypes realized in hybrids may be potential parents for greater frequency of partially dominant alleles (Koutsika and Karagounis, 2005). However, the changing environmental conditions affect the performance of maize genotypes which requires a breeding programme that needs to take into account the consequences of environment and genotype interaction in the selection and release of improved varieties. Allard and Bradshaw (1964) suggested that the selection of genotypes should be based on least interactions with environments. Accordingly, well developed single cross hybrids represent an interesting potential base population for double cross hybrid, as they have been previously tested in various environments. Thus, these hybrids generally present high and stable yield and desirable agronomic characteristics, with large proportions of favourable loci previously selected (Amorim and Souza, 2005).
 
The study of genetic divergence can assist in the choice of genotypes to be used in breeding programs for the development of new populations (Cruz and Regazzi, 1997). Genetic divergence is related to the degree of distance between populations in the set of genetic characters that differ between the populations. The more genetically diverse parents, the greater the chances of obtaining higher heterotic expression in F1s and broad spectrum of variability in segregating population (Shekhawat et al., 2001).
 
However, in most cases genetic distance is positively correlated with heterosis (Paterniani et al., 2008). Thus, the magnitude of heterosis is generally proportional to the genetic distance between the parents.According to Cargneluttial.(2008),genetic divergence (evaluated based on the genetic distance between individuals) is a predictive feature that allows for the identification of crosses with a higher probability of success.
 
Specifically, the evaluation of divergence can identify those crosses that will optimize heterosis while avoiding undesirable features. In the prediction of genetic divergence between genotypes, multivariate methods, such as principal component analysis and canonical variables are very useful tools.
 
The goal of this study was to evaluate the stability and genetic divergence among 20 experimental hybrids for the choice of suitable parents of new population. We also aimed to strengthen the further research strategies for predicting the high yielding stable and divers parents (single cross hybrids) for double cross hybrids through estimates of genetic divergence.


 MATERIALS AND METHODS

The present experiment was carried out at the Maize Breeding Research Station (MBRS), Poonch (India) situated between 33°-25’ to 34°-01’ N latitude and 73° -58’ to 74° -35’ E longitude, at a height of 3300 MSL and bounded by Kashmir valley and line of control with Pakistan. The experimental materials consist of 22 experimental hybrids developed at MBRS, Poonch. The hybrids are moderately resistant to most of the prevailing diseases and insects.  
 
The experiment was conducted in randomized block design for three years, that is, 2009, 2010 and 2011 following the recommended agronomical practice for maize and physiological data, which was recorded from mean of five randomly selected plants from each entry.
 
The stability among the hybrids was estimated following the method described by Eberhard and Russell, 1966. To study the genetic divergence among the hybrids used in present experiment and to know the fluctuation in clustering pattern, hybrids were calculated by canonical (Vector) and non-hierarchical Euclidean methods of divergence estimation. The D2 values were calculated by using the method described by Mahalanobis (1936).
 
Genetic divergence analysis using canonical (vector) method is a sort of multivariate analysis where canonical vector and roots representing different axes of differentiation and the amount of variation accounted for by each of such axes, respectively, were derived (Rao,1952). Non- hierarchical Euclidean cluster analysis (Beale, 1969; Katyal et al.,1985) was conducted using a computer software package (Windostat version 8.5).


 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The combined analysis of variance across locations and years   showed   highly significant   differences    among locationns (L) and genotypes (G) and their interaction (G x L). The maximum grain yield variation was observed due to genotypes whereas the environments play highest significant role in variation due to days of tasseling and maturity (Table 1). Genotype environment interaction was highly pronounced in variation for shelling percentage among the genotypes (Dabholkar, 1999). The knowledge about the extent of fluctuations of yield and yield attributes over environments is very important in identifying genotypes, which are widely adapted. 
 
 
Grain yield is a quantitatively inherited character and there is considerable interaction between genotypes and environments. Some of the crop varieties are widely adapted, whereas others are not. Because of the interactions between genotypes and environments, yield of genotypes tested across years vary and it is a problem for breeders to identify varieties that consistently give high yields in locations with diverse environmental conditions. Kang and Gorman (1989) reported that G x E interactions significantly reduced correlations between phenotypic and genotypic values. The results showed the hybrid PHM 12 was the highest among the others for grain yield, followed by PHM 34, PHM 14, PHM 10 and PHM 31 (Table 2). According to the joint regression model, the most stable hybrid with high mean yield and lowest S2 di value (0.999) was PHM 10 and its regression coefficient (bi) is 1.50, which can be an indication of its responsiveness to favourable environments (Table 2). Whereas the second most stable hybrid is PHM 31 with bi value 1.11, s2di 0.994 and high mean grain yield.
 
 
According to the model, the third most stable hybrid was PHM 34 with bi = 0.722, S2 di = -0.993 and mean yield 6.4 t ha-1 followed by PHM 23 and PHM 35 with bi value 1.73 and 0.79 respectively, both the hybrids exhibited high grain yield. Although the mean yield value of PHM 34 is less than PHM 12, the performance of the hybrid under unfavourable environments can be predicted. The evaluation showed that these single cross hybrids have high yield potential and are well suited in the prevailing agro-climatic condition.
 
Further, the hybrids may be used as source material for double cross hybrids as they showed stable yield and desirable agronomic characteristics, with large proportions of favourable loci previously selected.
 
From the point of selecting the hybrids (parents) for hybridization which are divergent enough for the character of interest, estimation of the genetic distance is most important. The present estimation of genetic divergence gave clear idea about the diverse nature of the population. Wide range of variation was observed in cluster mean performance for most of the characters studied. All the genotypes were grouped into five clusters, indicating the presence of diversity for different traits.
 
 
On the basis of results obtained from the present study, high degree of genetic divergence was observed among the hybrids under study (Liu et al., 2006). It is evident as more number of cluster (five) were formed by 22 hybrids (Figure 1) and high range of inter and intra cluster distance. Singh et al. (2005) also found wide range of variability in maize genotypes in his experiment. The more the diversity of parents, the greater the chances of obtaining high heterosis. (Williams and Hallarver, 2000). More et al. (2006) also reported more number of clusters and genotypes within the clusters in his experiments. Cluster 3 had maximum numbers of hybrids and cluster 2 and 5 had minimum number of hybrids (Figure 1). The maximum inter cluster distance was observed between cluster 1 and 5, and minimum was between cluster 3 and 5 (Table 3). The maximum intra cluster distance was noticed between hybrids of cluster 5 whereas it was minimum in cluster 2 (Table 2). The result indicated that the hybrids in different clusters differ largely and marginally   in   their   genetic   architecture   as  per  their maximum and minimum intra cluster distance, respectively.
 
 
 
Similar experiment was also carried out by Castanon et al. (1999) and Chen et al. (2007) who were of the opinion that geographical and genetic diversity exhibited no correspondence between them as hybrids from one and different origins were grouped together. This might be due to free exchange of genetic material from different regions. These findings were similar to the findings of Yin et al. (2004).
 
Principal factors were carried out using the principal component (PC) method for factor extraction. Differentiation among populations occurs in stages, or in other words in different axes of differentiation which accounts for total divergence (Crossa, 1990). Theoretically, many axes of differentiation can be envisaged as there are characters contributing to total variation, but it is not absolute. It is possible that most of the variation is accounted for by the first two or more axes of differentiation (Liu et al., 2006).
 
In the present investigating only the first three principal components showed eigen values more than one and cumulatively they explained 81.28% variability (Table 4). The first principal component explained 39.49% of the total variation and the second and third principal components explained 25.66% and 16.13% variation, respectively. The first principal component (λ1) absorbed and  accounted for maximum (39.49%) proportion of variability and the remainder accounted for progressively lesser amount of variation (25.66 and 16.13) for λ2, λ3 and λ4, respectively. The study through canonical analysis revealed that on the basis of two axes, the cumulative percentage of variation absorbed by λ1 + λ2 was 65.15% whereas there are three effective axes Z1, Z2 and Z3 where λ1 + λ2 + λ3 = 81.28%. 
 
 
In Vector 1 shelling percent with element value 0.523; in Vector 2 grain yield with element value 0.780 and in Vector 3 days to maturity with element value -0.780, contributed maximum to the total divergence at primary, secondary and tertiary axes of differentiation based on canonical vectors Z1, Z2 and Z3, respectively. Liu et al. (2006) also reported the similar   types of  findings  in  his experiment.
 
 The character contributing maximum to the divergence should be given greater emphasis for deciding the type of cluster for purpose of further selection and the choice of parents for hybridization. Genetic divergence between genotypes was measured in terms of spatial distance and resulted in formation of three dimensions (3D) based on three
 
PCA scores (λ1, λ2 and λ3 graphs) as depicted in Figure 2. Three principal factor scores were used to plot all the 22 hybrids using PCA1, PCA2 and PCA3, that is, 3D plot which accounted for most important component traits namely: shelling percent, grain yield and days to maturity. A similar type of study was also carried out by More et al. (2006), who reported that leaf area per plant, plant height and days to 50 percent flowering were the major contributor towards divergence, while studying forage maize. Amongst 22 maize hybrids, studied in the present study PHM 10 exhibited great extent of genetic diversity on the basis of 3D diagram based on PCA scores and Euclidian distance matrix, which reflected it as most diverse genotype for PHM 20 followed by PHM 25, PHM 23, PHM 35, PHM 31 etc. Whereas, the minimum genetic was observed between PHM 14 and K 612 (Figure 2). The hybrids, PHM 10, PHM 23, PHM 35 and PHM 31 showed significantly high stability and divergence for grain yield. Expectations for different combinations of quality characters along with yield and yield attributes should be considered as selection criteria for desired improvement.The similar type of work have also been done by Mishra and Dash (1997) who had found similar response   of   breeding   material   towards stability and divergence.
 


 CONCLUSION

Estimation of combining ability of parents is not always sufficient to reveal which combination should be used in breeding crosses. Instead analysis related to stability and genetic divergence of hybrids should be assessed together in evaluating potential crosses particularly for double cross hybrid. Considering the estimation of stability and genetic diversity together in the present investigation, both directional crosses namely PHM 10 x PHM 23, PHM 10 x 35 and PHM 10 x PHM 31 may be recommended which can throw out superior segregants in hybridization.


 CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors have not declared any conflict of interest.



 REFERENCES

Allard RW, Bradshaw AD (1964). Implication of genotype x environmental interaction in applied plant breeding. Crop Sci. 4:503-505.
Crossref
 
Amorim EP, Souza JC (2005). Híbridos de milho inter e intrapopulacionais obtidos a partir de populações S0 dehíbridos simples comerciais. Bragantia 64(3):561-567.
Crossref
 
Beale EML (1969). Euclidean cluster analysis. A paper contributed to 37th session of the Indian National Statistical Institute.
 
Cargnelutti Filho A, Ribeiro ND, Reis RCP, Souza JR, Jost E (2008). Comparação de métodos de agrupamento para o estudo da divergência genética em cultivares de feijão. Ciência Rural. 38(8):2138-2145.
Crossref
 
Castanon G, Tosquy H, Arano R, Raygoza B (1999). Cluster analysis in tropical maize hybrids and synthetics in Veracruz, Mexico. Agronomia Mesoamericana 9(2):77-81.
 
Chen FB, Yang KC, Rong TZ, Pan GT (2007). Analysis of genetic diversity of maize hybrids in the regional tests of Sichuan and Southwest China. Acta Agronomica Sinica. 33(6):991-998.
 
Crossa J (1990). Statistical analysis of multilocative traits. Adv. Agron. 44:55-85
Crossref
 
Cruz CD, Regazzi AJ (1997). Modelos biométricos aplicados ao melhoramento genético. 2nd ed. Viçosa: UFV
 
Dabholkar AR (1999). Elements of biometrical genetics. Concept Publishing Company. New Delhi, India.
 
Eberhart SA, Russell WA (1966). Stability parameters for comparing varieties. Crop Sci. 6:36-40.
Crossref
 
Kang MS, Gorman DP (1989). Genotype x environment interactions in maize. Agron. J. 81:662-664.
Crossref
 
Katyal JC, Doshi SP, Malhotra PK (1985). Use of cluster analysis for classification of Benchmark soil samples from India in different micronutrient availability group. J. Agric. Sci. Combridge. 104:421-424
Crossref
 
Koutsika-Sotiriou MS, Karagounis Ch A (2005). Assessment of maize hybrids. Maydica. 50:36-70
 
Liu YA, Hou JH, Gao ZJ, Zhou W (2006). Principal component analysis and cluster analysis of introduced maize varieties. J. Maize Sci. 14(2):16-18.
 
Mahalanobis PC (1936). On the generalized distance in statistics. - Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. (India) 2:49-55.
 
Mishra D, Dash SK (1997). Genetic diversity and stability in aromatic rice (Oryza sativa). Indian J. Agric. Sci. 67(1):27-29
 
More AJ, Bhoite KD, Pardeshi SR (2006). Genetic diversity studies in forage maize (Zea mays L.). Res. Crops 7(3):728-730.
 
Paterniani MEAGZ, Guimarães PS, Lüders RR, Gallo PB, Souza AP, Laborda PR, Oliveira KM (2008). Capacidade combinatória, divergência genética entre linhagens de milho e correlação com heterose. – Bragantia. 67(3):639-648. 2008.
Crossref
 
Rao CR (1952). Advanced Statistical Methods in Biometrical Research. John Wiley and Sons, New York. pp. 357-363
 
Shekhawat US, Vijay P, Singhania DL (2001). Genetic divergence in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Indian J. Agric. Res. 35(2):121-123.
 
Singh P, Sain D, Dwivedi VK, Kumar Y, Sangwan O (2005). Genetic divergence study in maize (Zea mays L.). Ann. Agric. Biol. Res. 10(1):43-46
 
William TR, Hallaver AR (2000). Genetic diversity among maize hybrids. - Maydica J. 45:163-171
 
Yin Z, Xue L, Deng D, Bian Y, Chen G, Lu H (2004). Cluster analysis of plant triats in maize inbreds. - Southwest China. J. Agric. Sci. 17(5):563-566.
 

 




          */?>