African Journal of
Agricultural Research

  • Abbreviation: Afr. J. Agric. Res.
  • Language: English
  • ISSN: 1991-637X
  • DOI: 10.5897/AJAR
  • Start Year: 2006
  • Published Articles: 6691

Full Length Research Paper

Silicon on rice seed yield and quality

Jucilayne Fernandes Vieira
  • Jucilayne Fernandes Vieira
  • Seed Science and Technology, Department of Plant Science, Federal University of Pelotas, 96010- 900, Pelotas, RS, Brazil.
  • Google Scholar
Luis Henrique kozen
  • Luis Henrique kozen
  • Seed Science and Technology, Department of Plant Science, Federal University of Pelotas, 96010- 900, Pelotas, RS, Brazil.
  • Google Scholar
Henrique Lopes Chagas
  • Henrique Lopes Chagas
  • Seed Science and Technology, Department of Plant Science, Federal University of Pelotas, 96010- 900, Pelotas, RS, Brazil.
  • Google Scholar
Acacio Figueiredo Neto
  • Acacio Figueiredo Neto
  • Federal University of the São Francisco Valley. Department of Agricultural Engineering, 56.304-205, Av. José de Sá Maniçoba, S/N, Centro, Petrolina, PE, Brazil.
  • Google Scholar
Paloma Bispo Coelho
  • Paloma Bispo Coelho
  • Federal University of the São Francisco Valley. Department of Agricultural Engineering, 56.304-205, Av. José de Sá Maniçoba, S/N, Centro, Petrolina, PE, Brazil.
  • Google Scholar
Lilian Vanussa Madruga de Tunes
  • Lilian Vanussa Madruga de Tunes
  • Seed Science and Technology, Department of Plant Science, Federal University of Pelotas, 96010- 900, Pelotas, RS, Brazil.
  • Google Scholar
Daniel Ândrei Robe Fonseca
  • Daniel Ândrei Robe Fonseca
  • Seed Science and Technology, Department of Plant Science, Federal University of Pelotas, 96010- 900, Pelotas, RS, Brazil.
  • Google Scholar
Bruna Barreto dos Reis
  • Bruna Barreto dos Reis
  • Seed Science and Technology, Department of Plant Science, Federal University of Pelotas, 96010- 900, Pelotas, RS, Brazil.
  • Google Scholar
Ana dos Santos Sunne
  • Ana dos Santos Sunne
  • Seed Science and Technology, Department of Plant Science, Federal University of Pelotas, 96010- 900, Pelotas, RS, Brazil.
  • Google Scholar


  •  Received: 10 September 2021
  •  Accepted: 17 February 2022
  •  Published: 30 April 2022

 ABSTRACT

The study aimed to evaluate the yield components and physiological quality of rice seeds produced, obtained from coated seeds with rice rusk ash and kaolin®. Treatments consisted of coating rice seeds with two sources of silicon (silicate of aluminum-70% SiO2 (kaolin® and rice husk ash- 95% SiO2) at doses of 0; 30; 60; 90 and 120 g.100 kg-1 seed. Yield components were evaluated: Seed yield per plant, number of panicles per plant and number of seeds per plant. The seeds were subjected to germination, first count, total length, and root seedling tests to evaluate seeds physiological quality. Seed coating provided no increase in seed yield per plant and number of panicles per plant. However, there was an increase in the number of seeds produced for the cv. IRGA 424. In the cv. Puita Inta CL was observed an increase in the number of panicles per plant. As for seed quality, increases in germination were observed when seeds were treated with rice husk ash and the untreated seeds for both cultivars.

Key words: Oryza sativa L., vigor, germination, rice husk ash, kaolin.


 INTRODUCTION

Although silicon (Si) is not an essential element for plant growth and development (Epstein, 1994), its absorption promotes benefits for many crops, including rice (Barbosa and Prabhu, 2002; Tunes et al., 2014; Oliveira et al., 2016; Debona et al., 2017; Frew et al., 2018; Vieira et al., 2020; Migliorini el al., 2021). These results have aroused considerable    interest    among    technicians, farmers, and researchers.

Using silicon increases seed yield and quality, reduces the incidence of  fungal  diseases,  improves  soil  fertility, reduces costs and environmental impacts, among others (Korndörfer et al., 1999; Matichenkov et al., 2005; Rufino et al., 2010; Vieira et al., 2011). Intensively used soils, highly weathered or leached soils and organic soils may have low levels of silicon available to plants. Thus, plants can be responsive to silicon application. Forms of application include seed, soil, and foliar treatments, with reports of yield gains from the adoption of this technique (Korndörfer and Datnoff, 1995; Rodrigues et al., 2019).

Silicon source materials are many, including: steel slag, wollastonite, by products of elemental phosphorus production, calcium silicate, aluminum silicate, sodium silicate, cement, thermophosphate, magnesium silicate, potassium silicate, and colloidal silica (Korndörfer et al., 2002). However, another interesting silicon source with application in agriculture is rice husk ash, an abundant material in the southern region of Brazil. Rice processing generates many products, including rice husk. In this case, energy generation through the burning of rice husk is a feasible alternative from a technological and economic point of view. The procedure is also relevant from an ecological point of view because there is technology for conversion; the raw material is abundant in the region, and the CO2 produced by burning returns to the carbon cycle of the terrestrial biosphere (Foletto et al., 2005).

In this context, this study evaluates yield components and the physiological quality of irrigated rice seeds coated with rice husk ash and kaolin®.


 MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sample collection

The study was conducted at the Didactic Laboratory of Seed Analysis (LDAS) and in a greenhouse at the Federal University of Pelotas, Capão do Leão city, Rio Grande do Sul State, Brazil. Seeds of the rice cultivars (cv.) ‘IRGA 424’ and ‘Puitá INTA CL’ were used.

Treatments consisted of coating rice seeds with two silicon sources (aluminum silicate (kaolin®) - 70% SiO2, and rice husk ash - 95% SiO2), at doses of 0; 30; 60; 90, and 120 g 100 kg-1 seeds. Seeds were coated with Sepiret® polymer at 300 mL 100 kg-1 seeds, with total syrup volume of 1 L 100 kg-1 seeds.

A design with each treatment and four replicates were used. The following orders of application of the products inside plastic bags were performed: aluminum silicate or rice husk ash, polymer, water, and, finally, the seeds (0.2 kg). The plastic bags were manually shaken for 3 min for complete adherence of the product to the seeds. Then, for each replicate, we opened the bags and left them to dry at room temperature for 24 h.

Green house study

The seeds were sown in 10-L buckets filled with sieved and homogenized soil collected from horizon A1 of a solodic eutrophic Haplic Planosol (EMBRAPA, 2006), belonging to the mapping unit of Pelotas, RS. The experiments began on November 1, with nitrogen, phosphate, and potassium fertilization following the recommendations of the Brazilian Soil Fertility and Chemistry Commission (Soil Fertility and Chemistry Commission - CQFS RS/SC, 2004) for irrigated rice. When plants presented four leaves, they were flooded and water level was maintained at 10 cm depth during the experiment. Cultural treatments followed the technical recommendations for irrigated rice in Rio Grande do Sul State (SOSBAI, 2005).

Pants were kept in buckets in a greenhouse until panicle harvesting. Then, panicles were manually harvested and dried them in an oven at 32 ºC until 13% moisture. Subsequently, plant yield components from the following variables were evaluated: number of seeds per plant; number of panicles per plant; and seed yield per plant (g/plant-1), weighing the seeds and  expressing  the  results  in grams.

Laboratory analysis

Germination test and seed counting (first germination counting) were carried out by using 200 seeds (four replicates of 50 seeds). The seeds were sown on three paper towels moistened with distilled water in the proportion of 2.5 times the weight of the dry paper. The paper rolls were kept at a temperature of 25 °C and the count of normal seedlings were performed at 5 and 14 days after sowing (BRASIL, 2009).

Shoot length (SL) and root length (RL) were also determined using four subsamples of 20 seeds for each treatment. The seeds were sown on paper towels, distributing the seeds unevenly in two longitudinal and parallel lines in the upper third of the paper. After making the rolls, they were kept at a constant temperature of 25 ºC (Nakagawa, 1999) for 5 days.

Statistical analysis

The experimental design was completely randomized with four replicates. Means were submitted to regression analysis, using mean comparison test when necessary. Data were analyzed by using WinStat statistical package (Machado and Conceição, 2003).


 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Seed coating did not increase seed yield per plant and number of panicles per plant in cultivar ‘IRGA 424’ (Figures 1A and 1B). However, the effect of the tested sources was significant for the variable number of seeds. The best curve that fitted the rice husk ash source was the quadratic curve, with better performance at 50 g 100 Kg-1 seeds. Above that dose there is no increase in the number of seeds. The best curve that fitted the kaolin source was the linear curve. Increased kaolin content in seed coating decreased the number of seeds per plant in cultivar ‘IRGA 424’ (Figure 1C).

In other crops, the silicon source rice husk ash significantly increased grain yield when compared to the kaolin source. However, the two sources evaluated did not differ for number of grains per plant (Mendonça et al., 2013). When studying the efficiency of the use of calcium and silicon in soybean seed yield and quality, Harter and Barros (2011) observed that the treatments reduced the seed yield per unit area. However, the physiological quality and vigor of the seeds were superior when compared to the control. Thus, this type of treatment could be indicated for seed production focusing on quality rather than quantity. When studying different Si sources, Pereira et al. (2004) and Lavinsky et al. (2016) also obtained significant increases in rice grain yield.

For cultivar ‘Puitá INTA CL’, the variables seed yield per plant and number of seeds per plant did not differ significantly as a function of seed coating with different silicon sources. The lack of response to the application of silicon verified by some authors may relate, among several   causes,   to  the  lack  of  information  from  each cultivar regarding the requirement of this element (Mauad et al., 2003). Notwithstanding, in the present study, the variable number of panicles presents a quadratic behavior for the kaolin source up to a dose of 45 g 100 kg-1 seeds (Figure 2B). Above that dose, however, this variable decreases with the increase in seed kaolin content.

The use of phyllosilicate via seed coating increased production components and yield of the corn crops. These results were observed by Rodrigues et al. (2019) when working with this crop, in acid soil conditions. Baliza et al. (2007) also observed an increase in the number of panicles and in the percentage of fertile tillers from silicon application in rice crop. In soybeans, Zago et al. (2010) did not obtain a significant difference for number of seeds per plant. When testing different silicon doses in three wheat and two oat cultivars, Lima-Filho and Tsai (2007) observed a significant increase in yield in both crops, but more markedly in wheat, whose increase in seed yield reached 100%.

The study by Faria Júnior et al. (2009), on the response of dry matter production and content and accumulation of silicon on different rice cultivars subjected to variable dosages of silicon, verified that the Si doses did not influence the growth components, except for root dry matter and with differences only among cultivars. In relation to the comparison between two cultivars, it is a common approach in experiments that evaluate the performance of seeds subjected to a treatment with nutrients (Rufino et al., 2017). Thereby, many surveys have been conducted in this way, assessing several varieties and their responses to the application of nutrients, such as the works by Tavares et al. (2015) with barley seeds and the same authors in 2012 and 2013 (Tavares et al. 2012, 2013) with rice seeds or that by Queiroga et al. (2009) with cotton seeds. Significant differences in the response to the seed coatings were also observed between the two soybean genotypes by Rufino et al. (2017).

Table 1 shows the results of the first germination count (FGC) and germination (Germ) tests of the seeds produced from silicon coating with different sources and doses in cultivar IRGA 424. Silicon sources and doses interacted significantly. In the FGC test, all doses of the kaolin source led to lower results when compared to the zero dose (control). In the same test, rice husk ash doses did not differ significantly from each other or from the control.

The result of the germination test (Table 1) used to assess seed quality showed a significant difference between treatments. There is a positive effect of sources and doses of silicon when compared to the control. For the rice husk ash source, the control obtained a lower germination percentage than all other treatments, indicating that doses and sources of silicon improve the physiological quality of seeds. On the other hand, in this study, kaolin do not improve germination of seeds and showed low germination at the doses of 30, 60 and 90 per 100 kg-1 seeds, while at the highest dose  (120 g per 100 kg-1 seeds) were equal to the control.

Tavares et al. (2012) observed that the coating of lowland rice seed with dolomitic limestone and aluminium silicate did not negatively affect the physiological quality of the seed. The authors also mentioned the treatments produced increments in the initial growth of seedlings relative to the control treatment. Nevertheless, researches regarding nutrients applied via seed coating have raised divergences among researchers. Oliveira el al. (2016) reported that silicon application via seed treatment provides the production of rice seeds with greater vigor. However, certain authors have stated that coating can negatively affect the physiological quality of seed. In a similar fashion, Franzin et al. (2004) found that germination of lettuce seed was inhibited after coating.

However, Funguetto et al. (2010) working with rice seeds coated with zinc, concluded that seed germination is not affected; and Vieira and Moreira (2005) obtained similar results. The results found by Corlett et al. (2014) showed that a coating of polymer, fungicide, calcium and silicon did not affect the physiological quality of the barley seed and that the use of these products can protect the seed against pathogens without affecting the rate of emergence of the barley seedlings.

Therefore, research studies may be done to discover new information and to answer questions about seed coating and more information is needed about  the  effects that these coatings may have on germination, vigor, emergence and early seedling growth. The kaolin source reduced the values of the first germination count (Figure 3A).  For the rice husk ash source, the values of the first germination count increased from the dose of 40 g 100 kg-1 seeds (Figure 3A). Kaolin doses below 60 g 100 kg-1 seeds reduced the germination of rice seeds. However, using this source at higher doses increased germination (Figure 3B). For the rice husk ash, germination increased when using this source up to a dose of around 90 g 100 kg-1 seeds, with a reduction trend at higher doses.

For cultivar ‘IRGA 424’, the silicon sources and doses did not significantly affect total seedling and root length (Figure 4A and 4C). The kaolin source did not significantly affect shoot length, as opposed to the rice husk ash source, which increased this variable at doses up to 90 g 100kg-1 of seeds. Above this value there is a tendency  for seedling shoot length to decrease (Figure 4B). Tavares et al. (2012) found that treatments of the rice cultivar IRGA 422 CL with dolomitic limestone and aluminium silicate, either alone or in  combination, showed significantly greater values of leaf area than the control treatment.

When studying rice seedlings, Guo et al. (2005) found similar results with silicon addition in nutrient solution, observing an increase in shoot length but no increase in root length. Nutritional requirements and plant growth vary according to species and cultivar, depending on their efficiency of absorption, translocation, and use of nutrients (Fageria, 1998).

As shown in Table 2 for the rice husk ash source, the control obtained a lower results observed in the first count of germination and germination percentage than all other treatments, indicating that doses and sources of silicon improve the physiological quality of seeds. In relation to the treatment with kaolin, in this study, showed germination equal to the control at the doses of 60 and 120 per 100 kg-1 seeds, while at the doses of 30 and  90 g per 100 kg-1 seeds were superior to the control.

In the work by Olivereira et al. (2016), when using different doses and sources of silicon for seed coating observed an interaction between the sources and the doses of silicon. The results of the first count of germination were adjusted to a quadratic polynomial model, when the seeds were produced as a function of the coating with kaolin source, which can be observed as a point of maximum at the dose of 77 and 78 g 100 kg-1 of seeds, respectively.

For cultivar ‘Puitá INTA CL’, the sources differ from each other at the dose of 60 g 100 kg-1 seeds. At this dose,  the  rice  husk  ash  source  was  superior  to  the control for the first germination count and germination tests (Figure 5A and B). For the rice husk ash source, the first germination count and germination tests had similar trend line behavior. Increasing doses of this source influenced both tests, with maximum efficiency at 82 g 100kg-1 of seeds. The values of these tests decreased from this dose up to that of 120 g 100 kg-1  seeds  (Figures 5A and 5B).

For cultivar ‘Puitá INTA CL’, kaolin sources did not significantly affect total length, shoot length, and root length. The rice husk ash source was the one that best fitted the doses tested in the regression for total seedling length (Figure 6A). As the dose of this source increases up to 90 g 100kg-1 seeds of seeds, there is a tendency towards reduction of this variable. Shoot length also showed the same behavior (Figure 6B). Root length was not appropriate to identify dose responses with the sources tested (Figure 6C).

Oliveira et al. (2016) working with sources and doses of silicon observed that root length was lower when using kaolin source than the other sources at doses of 30 and 120 g per 100 kg of seeds, and at the highest dose (120 g per 100 kg of seeds) of rice husk ash was higher than the other  doses.   For  shoot length,  a  significant  interaction between the source and dose factors was observed, and it can be observed that the kaolin source was superior to the other sources at doses of 0 and 60 g per 100 kg-1 of seeds.

Results reported by Souza et al. 2015, who observed that different doses of calcium silicate and magnesium and maize plants found an increase in the dry matter of the aerial part, in leaf area and in height, 14 days after sowing, as the silicate dose was increased. In addition, the results reported by Migliorini et al. (2021), verified that the tests related to seedling growth and development, leaf (Si) and root (Ca) nutrient content were positively influenced by the  increase  in  doses,  and  it  was possible  to  find satisfactory responses in doses considered ideal among 90 up to 116 g.Si per 100.kg-1 of seeds. Seed coating is already a trend in Brazil and more research is needed to strengthen the use of this technique in different crops of agricultural importance. Coating rice seeds with silicon sources is a novelty in rice fields in southern Brazil.

The present study does not focus on the use of silicon for the control of pests and diseases, but research shows that silicon controls pathogens that attack plants in the field and in storage. In this case, seed treatment with silicon could be used to control pests and diseases, to establish the crop, and to protect stored seeds, but further research needs to be done in regard to discover new information about this theme.

In previous related studies, in the case of pests, silicon application in plants increased wear in the incisor region of insect pests when these individuals were in contact with leaves with higher silicon content. Silicon application can hinder the feeding of caterpillars, increasing mortality and cannibalism and, therefore, making plants more resistant to, for example, caterpillars and  borers  (Goussain  et  al., 2002; Korndörfer et al., 2002). Disease control studies addressing silicon have shown promising results because this element is readily absorbed by plants. Moreover, epidermal cell walls are the main deposit of silicon (Korndörfer, 2006); hence, the element reinforces this structure and increases resistance to pathogens and insects (Epstein, 2001). Korndörfer et al. (2002) observed a significant increase (47%) in irrigated rice production with increasing silicate doses. This increase is due to the effect of Si in controlling the severity of leaf blast.

Thus, the application of this element in seed treatment should be better studied. This is a promising low-cost technology, as silicon sources can be obtained from rice byproducts. The benefits can also be environmental, reducing the use of pesticides in the environment. New research is needed to improve the performance of seeds in the field and protect them during emergence and initial growth.


 CONCLUSION

Rice seed coating with kaolin up to a dose of 45 g 100 kg-1 seeds provides a greater number of panicles per plant in cultivar ‘Puitá INTA CL’.

As for seed physiological quality, when using rice husk ash as silicon source, the tested doses increased the germination percentage of seeds of the two rice cultivars. Seed coating increased the number of seeds produced in cultivar ‘IRGA 424’ for both sources up to a dose of 50 g 100 kg-1 seeds.


 CONFLICT OF INTERESTS

The authors have not declared any conflict of interests.



 REFERENCES

Baliza DP, JL Araujo, Faquin V, Ávila VFW (2007). Efeito da interação silício-nitrogênio sobre o crescimento do arroz. In XXXI congresso brasileiro de ciências do solo.

View

 

Barbosa MP, Prabhu AS (2002). Aplicação de silicato de Cálcio na cultura do arroz. Circular Técnica. Embrapa 51:2-4. 

 

BRASIL (2009). Ministério da Agricultura, Pecuária e Abastecimento. Regras para análise de sementes. Ministério da Agricultura, Pecuária e Abastecimento. Secretaria de Defesa Agropecuária. Brasília, DF: Mapa/ACS, p. 395.

 

Corlett MF, Rufino CA, Vieira JF, Tavares LC, Tunes LVM, Barros ACSA (2014). The influence of seed coating on the vigor and early seedling growth of barley. Ciencia e Investigación Agraria 41(1):129-136.
Crossref

 

CQFS RS/SC (Comissão De Fertilidade Do Solo - RS/SC) (2004). Manual de adubação e calagem para os Estados do Rio Grande do Sul e de Santa Catarina. SBCS - Núcleo Regional Sul. 10.ed. Porto Alegre, p. 400.

 

Debona D, Rodrigues FA, Datnoff LE (2017). Silicon's role in abiotic and biotic plant stresses. Annual Review of Phytopathology 55:85-107.
Crossref

 

Embrapa-Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (2006). Sistema brasileiro de classificação de solos. Centro Nacional de Pesquisa de Solos 2:306.

 

Epstein E (1994). The anomaly of silicon in plant biology. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 91(1):11-17.
Crossref

 

Epstein E (2001). Silicon in plants, facts vs. Concepts. In: DATNOFF, L.E. et al. (Ed.). Silicon in agriculture, Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 1-15.
Crossref

 

Fageria NK (1998). Otimização da eficiência nutricional na produção das culturas. Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental 2:6-16.
Crossref

 

Faria Júnior LA, Carvalho JG, Pinho PJ, Bastos ARR, Ferreira EVO (2009). Produção de matéria seca, teor e acúmulo de silício em cultivares de arroz sob doses de silício. Ciência e Agrotecnologia 33(4):1034-1040.
Crossref

 

Foletto EL, Hoffmann R, Hoffmann RS, Portugal JRUL, Jahn SL (2005). Applicability of rice husk ash. Química. Nova 28:1055-1060.
Crossref

 

Franzin SM, Menezes NL, Garcia DC, Rovers T (2004). Assessment of vigor in simple and pelletized lettuce seeds. Revista Brasileira de Sementes 26:114-118.
Crossref

 

Frew A, Weston LA, Reynolds OL, Gurr GM (2018). The role of silicon in plant biology: a paradigm shift in research approach. Annals of Botany 121:1265-1273.
Crossref

 

Funguetto CI, Pinto JF, Baudet L, Peske ST (2010). Desempenho de sementes de arroz irrigado recobertas com zinco. Revista Brasileira de Sementes 32(2):117-115.
Crossref

 

Goussain MM, Moraes JC, Carvalho JG, Nogueira NL, Rossi ML (2002). Efeito da Aplicação de Silício em Plantas de Milho no Desenvolvimento Biológico da Lagarta-do-Cartucho Spodoptera frugiperda (J. E. Smith) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Neotropical Entomology 31:305-310.
Crossref

 

Guo W, Hou YL, Wang SG, Zhu YG (2005). Effect of silicate on the growth and arsenate uptake by rice (Oryza sativa L.) seedlings in solution culture. Plant and Soil 272:173-181.
Crossref

 

Harter FS, Barros ACSA (2011). Cálcio e silício na produção e qualidade de sementes de soja. Revista Brasileira de Sementes 33:54-60.
Crossref

 

Korndörfer GH, Pereira HS, Camargo MS (2002). Silicatos de Cálcio e Magnésio na Agricultura. 2.ed. Uberlândia, GPSi/ICIAG/UFU. Boletim Técnico 1:24.

 

Korndörfer GH (2006). Elementos benéficos. In: M.S. Fernandes. Nutrição mineral de plantas. Viçosa, MG: Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência do Solo, Cap. 14:355-370.

 

Korndörfer GH, Arantes VA, Corrêa GF, Snyder GH (1999). Efeito do silicato de cálcio no teor de silício e na produção de grãos de arroz de sequeiro. Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo 23:635-641.
Crossref

 

Korndörfer GH, Datnoff LE (1995). Adubação com silício: uma alternativa no controle de doenças de cana-de-açúcar e do arroz. Informações Agronômicas 70:1-5.

 

Lavinsky AO, Detmann KC, Reis JV, Ávila RT, Sanglard ML, Pereira LF, Sanglard LMVP, Araújo WL, Da Matta FM (2016). Silicon improves rice grain yield and photosynthesis specifically when supplied during the reproductive growth stage. Journal of Plant Physiology 206:125-132.
Crossref

 

Lima-Filho OF, Tsai SM (2007). Crescimento e produção do trigo e da aveia branca suplementados com silício. Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária - Embrapa, Dourados, MS: Embrapa Agropecuária Oeste, Circular Técnica, P. 38.

 

Machado AA, Conceição AR (2003). Sistema de análise estatística para Windows. WinStat. Versão 1.0. UFPel. a adubação silicatada. Bioscience. Journal 29:1154-1162.

 

Matichenkov VV, Kosobrukhov AA, Shabnova NI, Bocharnikova EA (2005). Plant response to silicon fertilizers under salt stress. Agrokhimiya 10:59-63.

 

Mauad M, Grassi Filho H, Crusciol CAC, Corrêa JC (2003). Teores de silício no solo e na planta de arroz de terras altas com diferentes doses de adubação silicatada e nitrogenada. Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo 27:867-873.
Crossref

 

Mendonça AO, Tavares LC, Brunes AP, Monzon DLR, Villela FA (2013). Accumulation of silicon and phenolic compounds in plant shoots of wheat after silicon fertilization. Bioscience Journal 29(5):1154-1162.

 

Migliorini P, Rossetti C, Almeida AS, Avila NC, Madruga NP, Mattos FP, Tunes LVM (2021). Quality of calcium and magnesium silicate coated Phaseolus vulgaris seeds, Colloquium Agrariae 17(1):56-65.
Crossref

 

Nakagawa J (1999). Testes de vigor baseados no desempenho das plântulas. In: Krzyzanowski FC, Vieira RD, França-Neto JB. Vigor de sementes: conceitos e testes. Londrina: ABRATES. Cap. 2:9-13.

 

Oliveira S, Brunes AP, Lemes E, Tavares LC, Meneghello G, Leitzke ID, Mendonça AO (2016). Rice seed treatment with silicon and seed quality. Revista de Ciências 39(2):202-209.
Crossref

 

Pereira HS, Kondörfer GH, AA, Vidal AA, Camargo MS (2004). Fontes de silício para a cultura do arroz. Scientia Agricola 16:522-528.
Crossref

 

Queiroga VP, de Queiroz Castro LB, Palmeira Gomes J, da Silva AL, Cezar Alves NM, Ribeiro de Araujo D (2009). Qualidade fisiológica de sementes de algodão armazenadas em função de diferentes tratamentos e cultivares. Revista Brasileira de Produtos Agroindustriais 11(1):43-54.
Crossref

 

Rodrigues LA, Oliveira IC, Nogueira GA, Silva TRB, Candido ACS, Alves CZ (2019). Coating seeds with silicon enhances the corn yiekd of the second crop. Revista Caatinga 32:897-903.
Crossref

 

Rufino CA, Tavares LC, Martin-Ramos P, Vieira JF, Abreu Junior JS, Fernandes-Correa M, Martin-Gil J (2017). Performance of soybean seedlings upon nutrient application by seed coating. Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology 60:1-11.
Crossref

 

Rufino CA, Tavares LC, Trzeciak MB, Dor CS, Barros ACSA (2010). Acúmulo de material seca e area foliar em plantas de soja submetidas ao recobrimento de sementes com cálcio e silício. In XIX CIC, XII ENPOS e II Mostra Científica.

 

Sosbai (Sociedade Sul-Brasileira de Arroz Irrigado) (2005). Arroz Irrigado: recomendações da pesquisa para o Sul do Brasil, pp. 89-92.

 

Tavares LC, Brunes AP, Rufino CDA, Fonseca DAR, Gadotti GI, Villela FA (2015). Tratamento de sementes de cevada com zinco: potencial fisiológico e produtividade de sementes. Semina: Ciências Agrárias 36(2):585.
Crossref

 

Tavares LC, Fonseca DÂR, Brunes AP, Rufino CA, Meneguello GE, Barros ACSA (2013). Performance of rice seeds treated with zinc, boron, and molybdenum. Journal of Seed Science 35(4):532-539.
Crossref

 

Tavares LC, Rufino CA, Dorr CS, Barros ACSA, Peske ST (2012). Performance of low-land rice seeds coated with dolomitic limestone and aluminum silicate. Revista Brasileira de Sementes 34:202-211.
Crossref

 

Tunes LV, Fonseca DAR, Meneghello GE, Reis BB, Brasil VD, Rufino CA, Vilella FA (2014). Qualidade fisiológica, sanitária e enzimática de sementes de arroz irrigado recobertas com silício. Revista Ceres 61:675-685.
Crossref

 

Vieira AR, Oliveira JA, Guimarães RM, Pereira EM, Carvalho BO (2011). Qualidade de sementes de arroz irrigado produzidas com diferentes doses de silício. Revista Brasileira de Sementes 33:490- 500.
Crossref

 

Vieira EHN, Moreira GA (2005). Peletização de sementes de arroz. Embrapa Arroz e Feijão, 2p. (Embrapa Arroz e Feijão. Comunicado Técnico 111.

 

Vieira JF, Nadal M, Tunes LVM, Duarte G, Gewehr E, Correa OO, Neto AF, Costa MS (2020). Foliar and time of application of silicon and the effect on rice yield components, productivity and seed quality. African Journal of Agricultural Research 16(12):1721-1725.
Crossref

 

Zago AS, Silva CAT, Silva TRB, Viecelli CA, Verona E, Nolla A (2010). Efeito de doses de silício no desenvolvimento da soja. Cultivando o Saber 3:16-22.

 




          */?>