African Journal of
Environmental Science and Technology

  • Abbreviation: Afr. J. Environ. Sci. Technol.
  • Language: English
  • ISSN: 1996-0786
  • DOI: 10.5897/AJEST
  • Start Year: 2007
  • Published Articles: 1135

Article in Press

Calibration of the Hargreaves and Priestley-Taylor Equations for Estimating Reference Evapotranspiration in The Densu River Basin in Ghana

Frank O. Adjei, Kwaku A. Adjei and Emmanuel Obuobie

  •  Received: 22 February 2024
  •  Accepted: 12 December 2024
Reference evapotranspiration (ETo) define the maximum evapotranspiration that can occur in a basin. Its accurate estimation is therefore very important in accurately estimating how much water is available in any Basin for use, since the actual Evapotranspiration (AET) that occurs depends on the ETo estimated. AET is a parameter that is difficult to measure on the field and therefore are mostly estimated from ETo. Different empirical equations are used in estimating ETo with different levels of accuracy mostly defined by the set on input data. FAO-56 Penman-Monteith (FAO-56 PM), Priestley-Taylor and 1985 Hargreaves equation were used in computing ETo for a station in Koforidua and Accra airport and the results were compared with a measured ETo estimated from pan evaporation data. When the FAO-56 PM ETo were compared with the ETo from Priestley-Taylor and 1985 Hargreaves, the average root-mean-square error were 0.8659mm/d and 1.1770mm/d respectively. The Index of Agreement (d) between FAO-56 PM ETo values and ETo values from Priestley-Taylor and 1985 Hargreaves were 0.79 and 0.59 respectively. The estimated ETo values were however improved through local calibration of the Priestley-Taylor and 1985 Hargreaves equation were done. The results generally indicates that Priestley-Taylor equation better estimates ETo values from FAO-56 PM equation than 1985 Hargreaves equation. When ETo values estimated with FAO-56 PM, Priestley-Taylor and Hargreaves equation were compared to measured ETo values from pan evaporation data, FAO-56 PM equation performed better followed by Priestley-Taylor and then Hargreaves equation. This means that if enough data is available for ETo estimation then FAO-56 PM equation is best in estimating ETo values followed by Priestley-Taylor equation and then Hargreaves equation. However, where only maximum and minimum temperature are the only available data, then Hargreaves is recommended for the estimation of the ETo values.

Keywords: Evapotranspiration, Densu Basin, Hargreaves, Priestley-Taylor, Penman-Monteith