African Journal of
Microbiology Research

  • Abbreviation: Afr. J. Microbiol. Res.
  • Language: English
  • ISSN: 1996-0808
  • DOI: 10.5897/AJMR
  • Start Year: 2007
  • Published Articles: 5240

Full Length Research Paper

Occurrence of Vibrio parahaemolyticus in oysters (Crassostrea gigas) and mussels (Perna perna) of the seacoast of Santa Catarina, Brazil

Helen Silvestre da Silva
  • Helen Silvestre da Silva
  • Department of Science and Food Technology, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianopolis, Santa Catarina, Brasil.
  • Search for this author on:
  • Google Scholar
Karin de Medeiros
  • Karin de Medeiros
  • Department of Science and Food Technology, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianopolis, Santa Catarina, Brasil.
  • Search for this author on:
  • Google Scholar
Marília Miotto
  • Marília Miotto
  • Department of Science and Food Technology, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianopolis, Santa Catarina, Brasil.
  • Search for this author on:
  • Google Scholar
Clarissa Barreta
  • Clarissa Barreta
  • Department of Science and Food Technology, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianopolis, Santa Catarina, Brasil.
  • Search for this author on:
  • Google Scholar
Cleide Rosana Werneck Vieira
  • Cleide Rosana Werneck Vieira
  • Department of Science and Food Technology, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianopolis, Santa Catarina, Brasil.
  • Search for this author on:
  • Google Scholar


  •  Received: 03 December 2015
  •  Accepted: 24 February 2016
  •  Published: 07 September 2016

 ABSTRACT

This research aimed to identify and quantify Vibrio parahaemolyticus in fresh oysters (Crassostrea gigas), mussels (Perna perna) and seawater from different regions of cultivation of bivalve shellfishes in the seacoast of Santa Catarina, Brazil. Samples were collected between October 2012 and December 2013 and 130 oysters samples (Crassostrea gigas), 215 mussels samples (Perna perna) and 222 seawater were collected. The occurrence of V. parahaemolyticus in oysters and mussels was low, 10.76 and 11.62% of the samples tested. Higher incidences of V. parahaemolyticus were observed in seawater (18%). The density of V. parahaemolyticus in summer (December to March) was significantly greater than those in the other 3 seasons (P < 0.01). The occurrence of pathogenic V. parahaemolyticus in oyster, mussels and seawater was very low (<10%). It is recommend that control measures should be considered, including the establishment of an intensive and continuous monitoring of potentially pathogenic V. parahaemolyticus from all oyster-growing areas, the environmental parameters, and the assessment of the region-specific human health risk due to consumption of oyster.

 

Key words: Oyster, Crassostrea gigas, Vibrio parahaemolyticus, bivalve molluscs.


 INTRODUCTION

Seafood is recognized as a nutritious food choice, and is liked by increasing numbers of consumers worldwide (Hellberg et al., 2012). For the last two decades, there has been a fourfold growth in commercial aquaculture worldwide (Cabello, 2006). In Brazil, the production of bivalve shellfishes occurs mainly in the state of Santa Catarina, in the southern region of Brazil, due to the excellent geographical conditions of this area for the cultivation of marine organisms, such as the presence of a large number of bays, which facilitates the establishment of marine farms (Coelho et al., 2003; Corrêa et al., 2007).
 
 
Despite the increase, the main obstacles in the consumption of seafood are its high perishability and risk to health due to contamination by pathogens (Reyhana and Kutty, 2014). In addition to the indicators of faecal contamination, which are used to assess the microbiological quality of bivalve molluscs in Brazil, different species of the Vibrio genus occur naturally in marine, coastal and estuary environments, where some species such as Vibrio parahaemolyticus, Vibrio vulnificus and Vibrio cholerae are potentially pathogenic for men, and may be present in fishes and raw shellfishes or partially subjected to cooking (Thompson et al., 2004). The possibility of seafood consumers to be infected by pathogenic vibrios by eating oysters depends on the microbiological quality of the marine habitat, as well as on the practices of handling and processing of these shellfish (Vieira et al., 2011). The occurrence of these bacteria is not related to the counts of Escherichia coli or thermotolernat coliforms, therefore the specific constant monitoring is required (Pereira, 2002; Oliver, 2006; Suffredini et al., 2014).
 
Infections caused by Vibrio parahaemolyticus have been reported in several countries in Asia (Chiou et al., 2000; Chowdhury et al., 2013; Kubota et al., 2008; Ma et al., 2014; Okuda et al., 1997; Tuyet et al., 2002; Vuddhakul et al., 2006), United States (Haendiges et al., 2014; Sims et al., 2011), in Europe only a few outbreaks or sporadic cases were reported in the last decade as a consequence of the consumption of local or imported seafood (Martinez-Urtaza et al., 2005; Ottaviani et al., 2008, 2010b, 2012; Quilici et al., 2005; Sala et al., 2009), and some South American countries like Chile (Fuenzalida et al., 2006; Cabello et al., 2007; Harth et al., 2009), Peru (Gil et al., 2007; Martinez-Urtaza et al., 2008) and Brazil (Leal et al., 2008) have also reported outbreaks.
 
Pathogenic strains of Vibrio parahaemolyticus can be differentiated from non-pathogenic strains with its ability to produce thermostable hemolysin (TDH), whose production is called the Kanagawa phenomenon. The pathogenicity of Vibrio parahaemolyticus is associated with the presence of the tdh and trh gene in oysters (Nishibuchi and Kaper, 1995).
 
The concentration of V. parahaemolyticus, in oysters and mussels is directly related to water temperature, with a higher concentration being present when the bivalve molluscs are in warm water. Because of this, these microorganisms are rarely isolated when the water temperature is below 15°C (Pruzzo et al., 2005; Su and Liu, 2007). In Brazil, the temperature of sea waters is above 20°C in most of the year, favouring the occurrence of these microorganisms in the different stations.


 MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between October, 2012 and December, 2013, 130 oysters samples (Crassostrea gigas), 215 mussels samples (Perna perna) and 222 seawater samples were collected directly from three geographical regions in Santa Catarina where there is shellfish farming in Brazil (Figure 1).
 
 
Each oysters and mussels sample consisted of 12 units. The oysters and mussels were transported to the laboratory in an isothermal box with packaged potable ice, and analyzed within 6 h of sampling.
 
The oysters and mussels were scrubbed under tap water to remove debris, allowed to dry, disinfected with 70% ethanol, and opened aseptically using a sterilized knife. The flesh and intervalve liquid were aseptically transferred to sterile bags and were homogenized for 1 min, forming the pool of 12 units.
 
Isolation and enumeration of Vibrio parahaemolyticus in oyster and mussels samples
 
Enumeration of V. parahaemolyticus was performed using most probable number (MPN) technique (Kaysner and DePaola, 2004). Approximately 25 g of the homogenate was added to 225 ml of phosphate buffered saline (PBS). Serial 10-fold dilutions were prepared up to 1:106 and three aliquots of each dilution were inoculated into alkaline peptone water tubes and incubated overnight at 37°C. After incubation, a loopful from the top 1 cm, approximately, of each broth tube with turbid growth was streaked onto thiosulfate-citrate-bile salts-sucrose (TCBS) agar plates (Oxoid, UK) and incubated at 37°C for 24 h. Five to ten typical colonies from each plate were selected and isolated for identification. Sucrose-negative (blue-green on TCBS agar) colonies were submitted to confirmation as Gram-negative and oxidase-positive. Further biochemical differentiation for identification and confirmation of isolated items were performed using the API 20E system (bioMérieux, France). Total populations of V. parahaemolyticus in oysters and mussels were determined by converting numbers of APW tubes that were positive for V. parahaemolyticus to MPN g-1 using the MPN table. All strains of V. parahaemolyticus were confirmed genotypically through the detection of the tlh gene by multiplex qPCR.
 
Multiplex PCR for the detection of rox, tdh and trh genes
 
The extraction of bacterial DNA was made in QiaCube equipment (Qiagen) using the DNeasy Blood and Tissue kit (Qiagen) with specific protocol for the equipment. Real time multiplex PCR was performed using the kit V. parahaemolyticus multiplex kit (Biotecon). The target genes were the Rox to confirm the species, and tdh and trh genes of pathogenicity. The protocol used was indicated in the kit manual.
 
Statistical analysis
 
Results of microbiological tests were transformed into log values and were assumed to be normally distributed; statistical analyses were performed in the Statistica 7.0® software (Stat-Soft, Inc., USA). To facilitate statistical analyses of quantitative data obtained by most probable number for counts V. parahaemolyticus when levels were below the limit of detection, there was substitution for 2 MPN g-1 and test of significance of the  observed  differences  in  V. parahaemolyticus levels, environmental parameters in oysters and mussels across the 22 samplings sites was conducted using a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), an alpha level of 0.05 was considered using the minimum level for statistical significance.
 

 


 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The occurrence of V. parahaemolyticus in oysters and mussels was low, 10.76% and 11.62% of the samples tested (Table 1). Higher incidences of V. parahaemolyticus were observed in seawater (18%).
 
 
The densities of V. parahaemolyticus in oyster, mussels and seawater samples are listed in Table 1. They were higher in the summer months, especially in February and March. The density of V. parahaemolyticus in summer (December to March) was significantly greater than those in the other 3 seasons (P < 0.01). The occurrence of pathogenic V. parahaemolyticus in oyster, mussels and seawater was very low (<10%). Only 4 of 130 oysters, 5 of 215 and 5 of 220 seawater samples contained detectable levels of pathogenic strains. These results indicated that most V. parahaemolyticus in the environment were nonpathogenic to humans. Although, the levels of V. parahaemolyticus in oysters reported in this study were much lower, postharvest processing conditions and storage temperatures could allow contaminated V. parahaemolyticus to multiply to a higher level in market oysters. Studies have shown that the populations of V. parahaemolyticus in unrefrigerated oysters could increase rapidly to reach 50-fold to 790-fold its original level within 24 h after harvest if oysters were exposed to an elevated temperature (Gooch et al., 2002).
 
Epidemiological data from CDC on association with V. parahaemolyticus gastroenteritis with tdh-carrying strains in the period 2001–2004 and US risk assessment studies on oysters (FDA, 2005), support the assumption that V. parahaemolyticus risk is proportional to exposure to different levels of pathogenic V. parahaemolyticus (WHO, 2011). According to some studies, pathogenic V. parahaemolyticus levels may be reliably estimated from total V. parahaemolyticus levels (Miwa et al., 2003; Nordstrom et al., 2007). On the other side, other studies showed that the ratio between total and pathogenic V. parahaemolyticus in the environment may be quite variable over time, as in the case of the monitoring performed in Alaskan waters, where percentage of potentially pathogenic strains in two consecutive summers (2004 and 2005) changed from 74 to 30% (WHO, 2011). Such variability, together with the limited number of quantitative data on V. parahaemolyticus levels in the environment and in shellfish harvested in regions as Europe (Cantet et al., 2013), Asia (Deepanjali et al., 2005), South America (Garcia et al., 2009), which are occasionally involved in outbreaks, underline the need for analytical assays which allow the enumeration of both total and potentially pathogenic (tdh and/or trh positive) V. parahaemolyticus strains. Trouble variables for the presence of V. parahaemolyticus in seafood have been shown in studies by many researchers around the world, using conventional bacteriological methods. The results found in this study are in agreement with the results reported by Nordstrom et al. (2007), a study conducted in Alaska (USA), Cabello et al. (2007) in Chile, Gil et al. (2006) in Peru and Quintoil et al. (2007), India.
 
Higher incidence of V. parahaemolyticus, however, was found using conventional methods of wild mullet in Italy (Serracca et al., 2011), cockles in Indonesia (Zulkifli et al., 2009), various seafood in India (Chakraborty et al., 2008) and in the USA mussels (Lu et al., 2006). Furthermore, the lower incidence of 8% (Hassan et al., 2012), were reported in the Netherlands seafood. Ramos et al. (2014) found an incidence of V. parahaemolyticus, 30.0% in samples of oysters and 33.3% in water samples from cultivation sites in Bahia Sul in Florianopolis, in the study region of this work.
 
Several factors are involved in the distribution and survival of microorganisms in estuarine ecosystems such as biotic and abiotic parameters of water, such as temperature, salinity, pH and turbidity (Ristori et al., 2007; Strom and Paranjpye, 2000). The concentration of V. parahaemolyticus in seawater increases with increasing temperature and is correlated with the seasonal increase in the occurrence of sporadic cases of infections in months with higher temperature (Hlady and Klontz, 1996).
 
The presence of V. parahaemolyticus seems to be constant where the sea water temperature is >10°C, unlike what occurs in Europe, where isolation of this pathogen decreases during the winter months (Baker-Austin et al., 2013). Hence, V. parahaemolyticus can be considered ubiquitous in the marine environment. The World Health Organization (WHO, 2011) listed the optimum temperature for V. parahaemolyticus growth as 37°C, with a wide growth range of 5-43°C. Several studies have shown a positive correlation between contamination of raw shellfish by V. parahaemolyticus and water temperature with higher frequencies being detected during warmer months in spring and summer seasons than in winter (DePaola et al., 2003; Parveen et al., 2008; Johnson et al., 2012; Ceccarelli et al., 2013).
 
The data provided in this study on contamination levels of total and potentially pathogenic V. parahaemolyticus and seasonal distribution, will help in defining appropriate monitoring programs and post-harvest policies for this hazard. The acquisition of further quantitative information on V. parahaemolyticus distribution in production areas and marketed products (exposure assessment), together with studies on the effectiveness of post-harvest treatments, will help in the definition of codes of practice for vibrios in shellfish and improve the safety of products.


 CONCLUSION

In conclusion, these results demonstrate greater seasonal variations in total and pathogenic V. parahaemolyticus densities in oysters. Hence, there may be more un-certainty in the use of densities of total V. parahaemolyticus organisms as alternative for risk predictions as was previously recognized. These findings can provide a reference for the comprehensive manage-ment and control of the harvesting areas. Therefore, it is recommended that control measures should be considered, including the establishment of an intensive and continuous monitoring of potentially pathogenic V. parahaemolyticus from all oyster-growing areas, the environmental parameters, and the assessment of the region-specific human health risk due to consumption of oyster. Thus, more research is needed to assess differences in virulence among various toxigenic strains and to assess and manage the risk of illness due to human exposure to oysters harvested in contaminated environments under the light of the climate change.


 CONFLICT OF INTERESTS

Authors have not declared any conflict of interests.



 REFERENCES

Baker-Austin C, Trinanes JA, Taylor NGH, Hartnell R, Siitonen A, Martinez-Urtaza J (2013). Emerging Vibrio risk at high latitudes in response to ocean warming. Nat. Clim. Change 3:73-77.
Crossref
 

Cabello FC (2006). Heavy use of prophylactic antibiotics in aquaculture: A growing problem for human and animal health and for the environment. Environ. Microbiol. 8(7):1137-1144.
Crossref

  
 

Cabello FC, Espejo R, Hernandez MC, Rioseco MR, Ulloa J, Vergara JA (2007). Vibrio parahaemolyticus O3: K6 epidemic diarrhea, Chile, 2005. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 13(4):655-656.
Crossref

  
 

Cantet F, Hervio-Heath D, Caro A, Le Mennec C, Monteil C, Quemere C, Jolivet-Gougeon A, Colwell RR, Monfort P (2013). Quantification of Vibrio parahaemolyticus, Vibrio vulnificus and Vibrio cholerae in French Mediterranean coastal lagoons. Res. Microbiol. 164:867-874.
Crossref

  
 

Ceccarelli D, Hasan NA, Hug A, Colwell RR (2013). Distribution and dynamics of epidemic and pandemic Vibrio. (parahaemolyticus) virulence factors. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 3:97.
Crossref

  
 

Chakraborty RD, Surendran PK, Joseph TC (2008). Isolation and characterization of Vibrio parahaemolyticus from seafoods along the southwest coast of India. World J. Microb. Biotechnol. 24(10):2045-2054.
Crossref

  
 

Chiou CS, Hsu SY, Chiu SI, Wang TK, Chao CS (2000). Vibrio parahaemolyticus serovar O3:K6 as cause of unusually high incidence of food-borne disease outbreaks in Taiwan from 1996 to 1999. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38:4621-4625.

  
 

Chowdhury G, Ghosh S, Pazhani GP, Paul BK, Maji D, Mukhopadhyay AK, Ramamurthy T (2013). Isolation and characterization of pandemic and nonpandemic strains of Vibrio parahaemolyticus from an outbreak of diarrhea in North 24 Parganas, West Bengal. India. Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 10:338-342.
Crossref

  
 

Coelho C, Heinert AP, Simões CM, Barardi CR (2003). A virus detection in oysters (Crassostrea gigas) in Santa Catarina State, Brazil, by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction. J. Food Protect. 66:507-511.

  
 

Corrêa AA, Albarnaz JD, Moresco V, Poli CR, Teixeira AL, Simões CM (2007). Depuration dynamics of oysters (Crassostrea gigas) artificially contaminated by Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. Mar. Environ. Res. 63:479-489.
Crossref

  
 

Deepanjali A, Kumar HS, Karunasagar I (2005). Seasonal variation in abundance of total and pathogenic Vibrio parahaemolyticus bacteria in oysters along the southwest coast of India. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71:3575-3580.
Crossref

  
 

DePaola A, Nordstrom JL, Bowers JC, Wells JG, Cook DW (2003). Seasonal abundance of total and pathogenic Vibrio parahaemolyticus in Alabama oysters. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 69:1521-1526.
Crossref

  
 

FDA (2005). Quantitative risk assessment on the public health impact of pathogenic Vibrio parahaemolyticus in raw oysters. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, U.S. Food and Drug Administration. 309p.

  
 

Fuenzalida L, Hernandez C, Toro J, Rioseco ML, Romero J, Espejo RT (2006). Vibrio parahaemolyticus in shellfish and clinical samples during two large epidemics of diarrhoea in Southern Chile. Environ. Microbiol. 8:675-683.
Crossref

  
 

Garcia K, Torres R, Uribe P, Hernandez C, Rioseco ML, Romero J, Espejo RT (2009). Dynamics of clinical and environmental Vibrio parahaemolyticus strains during seafood-related summer diarrhea outbreaks in Southern Chile. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75:7482-7487.
Crossref

  
 

Gil AI, Miranda H, Lanata CF, Prada A, Hall ER, Barreno CM, Nusrin S, Bhuiyan NA, Sack DA, Nair GB (2007). O3:K6 serotype of Vibrio parahaemolyticus identical to the global pandemic clone associated with diarrhea in Peru. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 11:324-328.
Crossref

  
 

Gooch JA, DePaola A, Bowers J, Marshall DL (2002). Growth and survival of Vibrio parahaemolyticus in postharvest American oysters. J. Food Prot. 65:970-974.

  
 

Haendiges J, Rock M, Myers RA, Brown EW, Evans P, Gonzalez-Escalona N (2014). Pandemic Vibrio parahaemolyticus, Maryland, USA, 2012. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 20:718-720.
Crossref

  
 

Harth E, Matsuda L, Hernández C, Rioseco ML, Romero J, González-Escalona N, Martínez-Urtaza J, Espejo RT (2009). Epidemiology of Vibrio parahaemolyticus outbreaks, Southern Chile. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 15(2):163-168.
Crossref

  
 

Hassan ZH, Zwartkruis-Nahuis JTM, De Boer E (2012). Occurrence of Vibrio parahaemolyticus in retailed seafood in the Netherlands. Food Res. Int. 19(1):39-43.

  
 

Hellberg RS, Christina AMD, Michael TM (2012). Risk‐benefit analysis of seafood consumption: A review. Comp. Rev. Food Sci. Food Safe. 11(5):490-517.
Crossref

  
 

Hlady W, Klontz K (1996). The epidemiology of Vibrio infections in Florida, 1981-1993. J. Infect. Dis. 173:1176-83.
Crossref

  
 

Johnson CN, Bowers JC, Griffitt KJ, Molina V, Clostio RW, Pei S, Laws E, Paranjpye RN, Strom MS, Chen A, Hasan NA, Huq A, Noriea III NF, Grimes DJ, Colwell RR (2012). Ecology of Vibrio parahaemolyticus and Vibrio vulnificus in the coastal and estuarine waters of Louisiana, Maryland, Mississippi and Washington (United States). Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 78:7249-7257.
Crossref

  
 

Kaysner CA, DePaola JRA (2004). Vibrio cholerae, V. parahaemolyticus, V. vulnificus and other Vibrio spp. in US Food and Drug Adminstration/ Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition (US FDA/CFSAN). Bacteriological Analytical Manual Online. Chapter 9.

  
 

Kubota K, Iwasaki E, Inagaki S, Nokubo T, Sakurai Y, Komatsu M, Toyofuku H, Kasuga F, Angulo FJ, Morikawa K (2008). The human health burden of foodborne infections caused by Campylobacter, Salmonella and Vibrio parahaemolyticus in Miyagi Prefecture, Japan. Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 5:641-648.
Crossref

  
 

Leal NC, da Silva SC, Cavalcanti VO, Figueiroa AC, Nunes VV, Miralles IS, Hofer E (2008). Vibrio parahaemolyticus serovar O3:K6 gastroenteritis in Northeast Brazil. J. Appl. Microbiol. 105:691-697.
Crossref

  
 

Lu S, Liu B, Cao J, Zhou B, Levin R (2006). Incidence and enumeration of Vibrio parahaemolyticus in shellfish from two retail sources and the genetic diversity of isolates as determined by RAPD-PCR analysis. Food Biotechnol. 20(2):193-209.
Crossref

  
 

Ma C, Deng X, Ke C, He D, Liang Z, Li W, Ke B, Li B, Zhang Y, Ng L, Cui Z (2014). Epidemiology and etiology characteristics of foodborne outbreaks caused by Vibrio parahaemolyticus during 2008–2010 in Guangdong province, China. Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 11:21-29.
Crossref

  
 

Martinez-Urtaza J, Lozano-Leon A, Varela-Pet J, Trinanes J, Pazos Y, Garcia-Martin O (2008). Environmental determinants of the occurrence and distribution of Vibrio parahaemolyticus in the Rias of Galicia, Spain. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 74:265-274.
Crossref

  
 

Martinez-Urtaza J, Simental L, Velasco D, DePaola A, Ishibashi M, Nakaguchi Y, Nishibuchi M, Carrera-Flores D, Rey-Alvarez C, Pousa A (2005). Pandemic Vibrio parahaemolyticus O3:K6, Europe. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 11:1319-1320.
Crossref

  
 

Miwa N, Nishio T, Arita Y, Kawamori F, Masuda T, Akiyama M (2003). Evaluation of MPN method combined with PCR procedure for detection and enumeration of Vibrio parahaemolyticus in seafood. Food Hyg. Safe Sci. 44:289-293.
Crossref

  
 

Nishibuchi M, Kaper JB (1995). Thermostable direct hemolysin gene of Vibrio parahaemolyticus: A virulence gene acquired by a marine bacterium. Infect. Immunol. 63:2093-2099.

  
 

Nordstrom JL, Vickery MC, Blackstone GM, Murray SL, DePaola A (2007). Development of a multiplex real-time PCR assay with an internal amplification control for the detection of total and pathogenic Vibrio parahaemolyticus bacteria in oysters. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 73:5840-5847.
Crossref

  
 

Okuda J, Ishibashi M, Hayakawa E, Nishino T, Takeda Y, Mukhopadhyay AK, Garg S, Bhattacharya SK, Nair GB, Nishibuchi M (1997). Emergence of a unique O3:K6 clone of Vibrio parahaemolyticus in Calcutta, India and isolation of strains from the same clonal group from Southeast Asian travelers arriving in Japan. J. Clin. Microbiol. 35:3150-3155.

  
 

Oliver JD (2005). Viable but nonculturable state in bacteria. J. Microbiol. 43:93-100.

  
 

Ottaviani D, Leoni F, Rocchegiani E, Canonico C, Potenziani S, Santarelli S, Masini L, Scuota S, Carraturo, A., 2010b. Vibrio parahaemolyticus-associated gastroenteritis in Italy: persistent occurrence of O3:K6 pandemic clone and emergence of O1:KUT serotype. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 66:452-455.
Crossref

  
 

Ottaviani D, Leoni F, Rocchegiani E, Santarelli S, Canonico C, Masini L, Ditrani V, Carraturo A (2008). First clinical report of pandemic Vibrio parahaemolyticus O3:K6 infection in Italy. J. Clin. Microbiol. 46:2144-
Crossref

  
 

Ottaviani D, Leoni F, Serra R, Serracca L, Decastelli L, Rocchegiani E, Masini L, Canonico C, Talevi G, Carraturo A (2012). Nontoxigenic Vibrio parahaemolyticus strains causing acute gastroenteritis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 50:4141-4143.
Crossref

  
 

Parveen S, Hettiarachchi KA, Bowers JC, Jones JL, Tamplin ML, McKay R, Beatty W, Brohawn K, Dasilva LV, Depaola A (2008). Seasonal distribution of total and pathogenic Vibrio parahaemolyticus in Chesapeake Bay oysters and waters. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 128:354-361.
Crossref

  
 

Pereira FS (2002). Methodologies to asses Vibrio spp. virulence. Proceedings of the Veterinary Sciences Congress, 2002. SPVC, Oieiras. pp. 281-286.

  
 

Quintoil N, Porteen K, Pramanik AK (2007). Studies on occurrence of Vibrio parahaemolyticus in fin fishes and shellfishes from different ecosystem of West Bengal. Livest. Res. Rural Dev. 19(1).

  
 

Pruzzo C, Huq A, Colwell RR, Donelli G (2005). Pathogenic Vibrio species in the marine and estuarine environment. In: Belkin S, Colwell RR (eds). Ocean and Health Pathogens in the Marine Environment. Springer-Verlag: New York. pp. 217-252.
Crossref

  
 

Quilici ML, Robert-Pillot A, Picart J, Fournier JM (2005). Pandemic Vibrio parahaemolyticus O3:K6 spread, France. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 11:1148-1149.
Crossref

  
 

Ramos RJ, Miotto LA, Miotto M, Silveira JN, Cirolini A, Silva HS, Rodrigues Ddos P, Vieira CR (2014). Occurrence of potentially pathogenic Vibrio in oysters (Crassostrea gigas) and waters from bivalve mollusk cultivations in the South Bay of Santa Catarina. Rev. Soc. Bras. Med. Trop. 47(3):327-333.
Crossref

  
 

Reyhanath PV, Kutty R (2014). Incidence of multidrug resistant Vibrio parahaemolyticus isolated from Ponnani, South India. Iran J Microbiol. 6 (2): 60–67.

  
 

Ristori CA, Iaria ST, Gelli DS, Rivera IN (2007). Pathogenic bacteria associated with oysters (Crassostrea brasiliana) and estuarine water along the south coast of Brazil. Int. J. Environ. Health Res. 17(4):259-269.
Crossref

  
 

Sala MR, Arias C, Dominguez A, Bartolome R, Muntada JM (2009). Foodborne outbreak of gastroenteritis due to Norovirus and Vibrio parahaemolyticus. Epidemiol. Infect. 137, 626–629.
Crossref

  
 

Serracca L, Battistini R, Rossini I, Prearo M, Ottaviani D, Leoni F, Ercolini C (2011). Vibrio virulence genes in fishes collected from estuarine waters in Italy. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 53(4):403-408.
Crossref

  
 

Sims JN, Isokpehi RD, Cooper GA, Bass MP, Brown SD, St John AL, Gulig PA, Cohly HH (2011). Visual analytics of surveillance data on foodborne vibriosis, United States, 1973-2010. Environ. Health Insights 5:71-85.

  
 

Strom MS, Paranjpye RN (2000). Epidemiology and pathogenesis of Vibrio vulnificus. Microbes Infect. 2(1):77-88.
Crossref

  
 

Su CY, Liu C (2007). Vibrio parahaemolyticus: A concern of sea food safety. Res. Microbiol. 24:549-558.

  
 

Suffredini E, Cozzi L, Ciccaglioni G, Croci L (2014). Development of a colony hybridization method for the enumeration of total and potentially enteropathogenic Vibrio parahaemolyticus in shellfish. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 186:22-31.
Crossref

  
 

Thompson FL, Iida T, Swings J (2004). Biodiversity of Vibrios. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 68:403-431.
Crossref

  
 

Tuyet DT, Thiem VD, Von Seidlein L, Chowdhury A, Park E, Canh DG, Chien BT, Van Tung T, Naficy A, Rao MR, Ali M, Lee H, Sy TH, Nichibuchi M, Clemens J, Trach DD (2002). Clinical, epidemiological, and socioeconomic analysis of an outbreak of Vibrio parahaemolyticus in Khanh Hoa Province, Vietnam. J. Infect. Dis. 186:1615-1620.
Crossref

  
 

Vieira RHSF, Costa RA, Menezes FGR, Silva GC (2011). Kanagawa-negative, tdh- and trh-positive Vibrio parahaemolyticus Isolated from fresh oysters marketed in Fortaleza, Brazil. Curr. Microbiol. 63:126-130.
Crossref

  
 

Vuddhakul V, Soboon S, Sunghiran W, Kaewpiboon S, Chowdhury A, Ishibashi M, Nakaguchi Y, Nishibuchi M (2006). Distribution of virulent and pandemic strains of Vibrio parahaemolyticus in three molluscan shellfish species (Meretrix meretrix, Perna viridis, and Anadara granosa) and their association with foodborne disease in southern Thailand. J. Food Protect. 69:2615-2620.

  
 

WHO (2011). Risk assessment of Vibrio parahaemolyticus in seafood. In: WHO (Ed.), MRA Series, Joint FAO/WHO expert meetings on microbiological risk assessment. 183p.

  
 

Zulkifli Y, Alitheen NB, Son R, Yeap SK, Lesley MB, Raha AR (2009). Identification of Vibrio parahaemolyticus isolates by PCR targeted to the toxR gene and detection of virulence genes. Food Res. Int. 16(3):289-296.

  

 




Copyright © 2025 Author(s) retain the copyright of this article.

This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0

Back to Vol. 10 No. 33
Back to articles
SUBSCRIBE TO RSS
SUBMIT MANUSCRIPT
CONFERENCES
          */?>