Full Length Research Paper
References
Dalal A, Attia Z, Moshelion M (2017). To Produce or to Survive: How Plastic Is Your Crop Stress Physiology? Frontiers in Plant Science 8:2067. |
|
Dhanda SS, Sethi GS, Behl RK (2004). Indices of drought tolerance in wheat genotypes at early stages of plant growth. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 190:6-12. |
|
Figueroa-Bustos V, Palta JA, Chen Y, Siddique KH (2019). Early season drought largely reduces grain yield in wheat cultivars with smaller root systems. Plants 8:305. |
|
Gallagher JN, Biscoe PV, Hunter B (1976). Effects of drought on grain growth. Nature 264:541-542. |
|
Humplík JF, Lazár D, HusiÄková A, Spíchal L (2015). Automated phenotyping of plant shoots using imaging methods for analysis of plant stress responses-a review. Plant Methods 11:29. |
|
Larkindale J, Hall JD, Knight MR, Vierling E (2005). Heat stress phenotypes of Arabidopsis mutants implicate multiple signaling pathways in the acquisition of thermotolerance. Plant Physiology 138:882-897. |
|
Lawlor DW (2012). Genetic engineering to improve plant performance under drought physiological evaluation of achievements limitations and possibilities. Journal of Experimental Botany 64:83-108. |
|
Liu J, Feng L, Li J, He Z (2015). Genetic and epigenetic control of plant heat responses. Frontiers in Plant Science 6:267. |
|
Massonnet C, Vile D, Fabre J, Hannah MA, Caldana C, Lisec J, Perkovic J (2010). Probing the reproducibility of leaf growth and molecular phenotypes a comparison of three Arabidopsis accessions cultivated in ten laboratories. Plant Physiology 152:2142-2157. |
|
Measures M, Weinberger P, Baer H (1973). Variability of plant growth within controlled-environment chambers as related to temperature light distribution Canadian Journal of Plant Science 53:215-220. |
|
Negin B, Moshelion M (2017). The advantages of functional phenotyping in pre-field screening for drought-tolerant crops. Functional Plant Biology 44:107-118. |
|
Pomeroy MK, Fowler DB (1973). Use of lethal dose temperature estimates as indices of frost tolerance for wheat cold acclimated under natural and controlled environments. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 53:489-494. |
|
Porter AS, Gerald CEF, McElwain JC, Yiotis C, Elliott-Kingston C (2015). How well do you know your growth chambers? Testing for chamber effect using plant traits. Plant Methods 11:44. |
|
Rascio A, Russo M, Platani C, Ronga G, Di Fonzo N (1999). Mutants of durum wheat with alterations in tissue affinity for strongly bound water. Plant Science 144:29-34. |
|
Rascio A, Nicastro G, Carlino E, Di Fonzo N (2005). Differences for bound water content as estimated by pressure-volume and adsorption isotherm curves. Plant Science 169:395-401. |
|
Sade N, Vinocur BJ, Diber A, Shatil A, Ronen G, Nissan H, Moshelion M (2009). Improving plant stress tolerance and yield production is the tonoplast aquaporin SlTIP2; 2 a key to isohydric to anisohydric conversion? New Phytologist 181:651-661. |
|
Sallam A, Mourad A M, Hussain W, Baenziger PS (2018). Genetic variation in drought tolerance at seedling stage and grain yield in low rainfall environments in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Euphytica 214:169. |
|
Vertucci CW, Leopold AC (1987). Water binding in legume seeds. Plant Physiology 85:224-231. |
|
Watt M, Fiorani F, Usadel B, Rascher U, Muller O, Schurr U (2020). Phenotyping: New Windows into the Plant for Breeders. Annual Review of Plant Biology, p. 71. |
|
Wittmer G, Iannucci A, De Santis G, Baldelli G, De Stefanis E, Brando A, Ciocca L, Rascio A (1982). Adattamento e fattori fisiologici limitanti la produttività del frumento duro. Rivista di Agronomia 2:61-70. |
|
Yeh CH, Kaplinsky NJ, Hu C, Charng YY (2012). Some like it hot some like it warm phenotyping to explore thermotolerance diversity. Plant Science 195:10-23. |
|
Zadok JC, Chang TT, Konzak CF (1974). A decimal code for the growth stages of cereals. Weed Research 14:415-421. |
Copyright © 2025 Author(s) retain the copyright of this article.
This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0