Educational Research and Reviews

  • Abbreviation: Educ. Res. Rev.
  • Language: English
  • ISSN: 1990-3839
  • DOI: 10.5897/ERR
  • Start Year: 2006
  • Published Articles: 2019

Full Length Research Paper

The effects of the authentic learning approach with a course management system (moodle) on students’ mathematics success and online authentic learning self-efficacy

Hüseyin Uzunboylu
  • Hüseyin Uzunboylu
  • Higher Education Planning Supervision Accreditation and Coordination Board (YODAK) Nicosia, Cyprus.
  • Google Scholar
Murat Tezer
  • Murat Tezer
  • Faculty of Science and Literature-Mathematics, Near East University, Nicosia, Cyprus.
  • Google Scholar
Ezgi Pelin Yildiz
  • Ezgi Pelin Yildiz
  • Department of Computer Programming, Kafkas University Kazım Karabekir Vocational School of Technical Sciences, Kars, Turkey.
  • Google Scholar


  •  Received: 21 October 2020
  •  Accepted: 18 November 2020
  •  Published: 30 November 2020

References

Al-Busaidi KA Al-Shihi H (2010). Instructors' acceptance of learning management systems: A theoretical framework. Communications of the IBIMA pp. 2-10.
Crossref

 

Baimurzayev B, Tekedere H (2019). Usability Analysis of Cloud-Based Moodle Learning Management System. TÜBAV Scientific Journal 12(4):16-25.

 
 

Baz FÇ (2016). The effect of Adaptive Online Web Based Material on Student Acedemic Success. PHD Thesis. Mustafa Kemal University, Institute of Science, Hatay, Turkey.

 
 

Büyüköztürk Åž (2013). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.

 
 

Caputi V, Garrido A (2015). Student-Oriented Planning of E-learning Contents for Moodle. Journal of Network and Computer Applications 53:115-127. 
Crossref

 
 

Çevik A (2008). Moodle öÄŸrenme yönetim sistemi yönetimindeki karşılaşılabilecek olası sorunlar ve çözüm önerileri. In 8th International Educational Technology Conference pp. 31-34.

 
 

Dikmen S, Bahceci F (2020). Covid-19 Pandemisi Sürecinde YükseköÄŸretim Kurumlarının Uzaktan EÄŸitime Yönelik Stratejileri: Fırat Üniversitesi ÖrneÄŸi. Turkish Journal of Educational Studies 7(2):78-98. 
Crossref

 
 

Donaldson L, Matthews A, Walsh A, Brugha R, Manda-Taylor L, Mwapasa V, Byrne E (2017). Collaborative Tools to Enhance Engagement in a Blended Learning Master's Programme. AISHE-J: The All Ireland Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education 9(1):2921-29220.

 
 

Downes S (2006). Learning Networks and Connective Knowledge. Instructional Technology Forum: Paper 92. 

 
 

Elmas Ç, DoÄŸan N, BiroÄŸul S, Koç MS (2008). Moodle EÄŸitim Yönetim Sistemi İle Örnek Bir Dersin Uzaktan EÄŸitim Uygulaması. BiliÅŸim Teknolojileri Dergisi 1(2):53-62.

 
 

Fer S (2009). Social Constructivism and Social Constructivist Curricula in Turkey for The Needs of Differences of Young People: Overview in light of the PROMISE project. In: T. Tajmel & S. Klaus (Eds.), Science education unlimited: Approaches to equal opportunity in learning science (179-199). Munster: Waxmann Verlag Co.

 
 

Fraenkel R, Wallen NE (2006). How to design and evaluate research in education (6th ed.). New York, NY McGraw-Hill.

 
 

Grabinger RS, Dunlap JC (2003). Rich Environments for Active Learning: A Definition. Association for Learning Technology Journal (ALT-J) 3(2):5-34. 
Crossref

 
 

Güngören ÖC, Horzum MB (2014). Otantik Çoklu Ortam. M. BektaÅŸ ve M.B. Horzum (Ed.). Otantik öÄŸrenme içinde (s.55-83). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.

 
 

Hijazi S, Crowley M, Smith ML, Schaffer C (2006) Maximizing Learning By Teaching Blended Courses. Proceedings of the 2006 ASCUE Conference, Myrtle Beach, South Carolina. Retrieved May 10, 2017, from: 

View

 
 

Huang H (2002). Toward Constructivism for Adult Learners In Online Learning Environments. British Journal of Educational Technology 33(1):27-37. 
Crossref

 
 

Hubackova S, Semradova I (2016). Evaluation of Blended Learning. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 217:551-557. 
Crossref

 
 

Lucua RB, Marin E (2014). Authentic Learning in Adult Education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 142:410-415. 
Crossref

 
 

Kaya Z (2002). Uzaktan EÄŸitim, Ankara: Pegem Akademi.

 
 

Khoroshko L, Ukhov P, Khoroshko A (2018). The Use CAD/CAE Systems to Cre-ate E-Learning Courses on Technical Subjects at University. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy 8(2):64-7. 
Crossref

 
 

Kwak DW, Menezes FM, Sherwood C (2013). Assessing The Impact of Blended Learning On Student Performance. Educational Technology & Society 15(1):127-136. 
Crossref

 
 

Lin YW, Tseng CL, Chiang PJ (2017). The Effect of Blended Learning in Mathematics Course. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 3:13. 
Crossref

 
 

Lombardi M (2007). Authentic Learning for the 21st Century: An Overview, ELI Paper 1: 2007, EDUCAUSE Learning initiative.

 
 

Maxwell D, Watkins B, Wheeler R, Collins G (2003). Coping Strategies Index: A Tool for Rapid Measurement. Field Methods Manual.

 
 

Oliver M (2015). Blended MOOCs: University Teacher's Perspective. In EC-TEL-WS-2015: Trends in Digital Education 18:11-25.

 
 

Onal A, Kaya A, Draman SE (2006). Açık kaynak kodlu çevrimiçi eÄŸitim yazılımları. Akademik BiliÅŸim (s. 251-254). Pamukkale University, Denizli in Turkey.

 
 

Olapiriyakul K, Scher JM. (2006). A Guide To Establishing Hybrid Learning Courses: Employing İnformation Technology To Create A New Learning Experience, And A Case Study. Internet And Higher Education 9:287-301. 
Crossref

 
 

Osguthorpe RT, Graham CR (2003). Blended Learning Environments Definitions and Directions. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education 4(3):227-233.

 
 

Park Y, Jo IH (2017). Using log variables in a learning management system to evaluate learning activity using the lens of activity theory. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 42(4):531-547.
Crossref

 
 

Rozano M, Romero J (2016). Skill Acquisition in Blended Learning Courses: Influence on Student Performance. International Journal of Learning and Teaching 8:30-39. 
Crossref

 
 

Robinson HA, Sheffield A, Phillips AS, Moore M (2017). "Introduction to Teaching Online": Usability Evaluation of Interactivity in an Online Social Constructivist Course. TechTrends pp. 1-8.
Crossref

 
 

Sekaran U, Bougie R (2003). Research Methods for Business: A Skill-Building Approach. 4th Edition, John Wiley & Sons, New York.

 
 

Schreglmann S, KarakuÅŸ M (2017). EÄŸitsel Arayüz Destekli EÄŸitim Yazılımlarının EleÅŸtirel DüÅŸünme ve Akademik BaÅŸarı Üzerindeki Etkisi. Mersin Üniversitesi EÄŸitim Fakültesi Dergisi 13(3):839-855. 
Crossref

 
 

SenemoÄŸlu N (2011). GeliÅŸim, öÄŸrenme ve öÄŸretim. PegemA Yayıncılık. 2. Baskı, Ankara.

 
 

Swan JG (2017). The Challenges of Online Learning: Supporting and Engaging the Isolated Learner. Journal of Learning Design 10(1):20-30. 
Crossref

 
 

Usun S (2006). Uzaktan Eğitim, Nobel Yayınları, Ankara.

 
 

Watters JJ, Ginns IS (2000). Developing Motivation to Teach Elementary Science: Effect of Collaborative and Authentic Learning Practices in Preservice Education. Journal of Science Teacher Education 11(4):277-313. 
Crossref

 
 

Weller M (2007). Virtual learning environments: Using, choosing and developing your VLE. Routledge.
Crossref

 
 

Tezer M, Yildiz EP, Uzunboylu H (2018). Online authentic learning self-efficacy: a scale development. Quality & Quantity 52(1):639-649. 
Crossref

 
 

Tierney K (2020). How Technology in the Classroom Is Shaping the Future of Education.

 
 

Yapıcı İÜ, Akbayın H (2012). Harmanlanmış ÖÄŸrenme Ortamında Moodle Kullanımı. EÄŸitim ve ÖÄŸretim AraÅŸtırmaları Dergisi 1(2):92-100.

 
 

Yamamoto GT, Altun D (2020). Coronavirüs ve Çevrimiçi (Online) EÄŸitimin Önlenemeyen YükseliÅŸi. Üniversite AraÅŸtırmaları Dergisi 3(1):25-34. 
Crossref