Journal of
Ecology and The Natural Environment

  • Abbreviation: J. Ecol. Nat. Environ.
  • Language: English
  • ISSN: 2006-9847
  • DOI: 10.5897/JENE
  • Start Year: 2009
  • Published Articles: 408

Full Length Research Paper

Aquatic macro invertebrate contribution in leaf litter breakdown in tropical mining area streams (Côte d’Ivoire, West Africa)

Séniva Ouattara Dongui
  • Séniva Ouattara Dongui
  • Laboratoire d’Environnement et de Biologie Aquatique (LEBA), UFR-Sciences et Gestion de l’Environnement (SGE), UNIVERSITE NANGUI ABROGOUA (UNA), 02 BP 801, Abidjan 02, Côte d’Ivoire.
  • Google Scholar
David Tapé Logboh
  • David Tapé Logboh
  • Laboratoire d’Environnement et de Biologie Aquatique (LEBA), UFR-Sciences et Gestion de l’Environnement (SGE), UNIVERSITE NANGUI ABROGOUA (UNA), 02 BP 801, Abidjan 02, Côte d’Ivoire.
  • Google Scholar
Edia Edia Oi
  • Edia Edia Oi
  • Laboratoire d’Environnement et de Biologie Aquatique (LEBA), UFR-Sciences et Gestion de l’Environnement (SGE), UNIVERSITE NANGUI ABROGOUA (UNA), 02 BP 801, Abidjan 02, Côte d’Ivoire.
  • Google Scholar


  •  Received: 08 May 2022
  •  Accepted: 24 October 2022
  •  Published: 31 October 2022

 ABSTRACT

The aim of the study was to determine how mining operations affected the health of aquatic ecosystems. The investigation was carried out in the diamond, gold, and manganese mining areas of Tortiya, Hiré, and Lauzoua. Leaf litter bags were used to assess breakdown. To further identify macro-invertebrates in the laboratory, leaves from emerged large-mesh bags were preserved in 70% alcohol. The results showed that there was no statistically significant difference in lost masses between small mesh nets and large mesh nets for a foliar species at the same station. The breakdown rates of Alchornea cordifolia in large mesh nets at N'Teko station were significantly higher (p<0.05) than in small mesh nets (0.017 j-1). The majority of the macro-invertebrates found in leaf litter bag were insects and gastropods, with proportions exceeding 50%. Insects dominated the macroinvertebrate group involved in leaf litter decomposition in Lauzoua (91% of associated species) and Hiré (56.5%), whereas gastropods (Mesogastropoda and Basommatophora, 77% of related organisms) were most abundant in Tortiya. The functional feeding groups of macro-invertebrates involved in the breakdown of leaf litter were dominated by predators (46% of species) and scrapers grazers (27% of taxa). Shredders made up only 1% of the species associated with leaf litter. Macro-invertebrates’ contribution was significantly higher (Mann -Whitney test, p <0.05) at Bou 1 station. Insects and gastropods made up the majority of the macro-invertebrates involved in litter decomposition. Breakdown rates were relatively low at all stations.

 

Key words: Macro-invertebrates, contribution, breakdown rates, mining areas, streams.


 INTRODUCTION

Leaf litter breakdown is a process involving biotic (macro-invertebrates, micro-organisms) and abiotic (physicochemical and chemical parameters). Aquatic macro-invertebrates are part of the invertebrate fauna visible to the naked eye. They carry out at least part of their life cycle in an aquatic environment and are larger than 0.5 mm. These organisms make it possible to establish a much more precise portrait of the integrity of an ecosystem according to the groups of communities that live there (Yoder and Rankin, 1995).

 

Among the macro-invertebrates, macro-invertebrate shredders are selective organisms which play important role in breakdown fluxes of leaf litters (Sena et al., 2020). Under natural conditions, streams litter is made up of leaves of various plant species. Leaf selection by shredders seems to impact their growth while taking into account the quality of the leaves (Tenkiano and Chauvet, 2017). Leaf selectivity by macro-invertebrates can be based on toughness, nutrient content and the presence of secondary plant components such as chemical defenses (Divekar et al., 2022). Leaf toughness could be a physical barrier to feeding of invertebrates, since harder leaves are probably more difficult to puncture than soft leaves (Barton et al., 2019). Consequently, some genera of macro-invertebrates at younger stage of development are unable to feed on hard leaves. The nutrient content of the leaves is a very important factor for the organisms that feed in the litter (Arias-Real et al., 2018). Finally, secondary compounds, involved in plant defenses are known to remain active after leaf senescence (Barton et al., 2019). These compounds can be toxic, disrupt digestion or give off bitter taste and act as food deterrents. Streams, whether forest or savannah, receive significant inputs of organic debris. These ecosystems are generally heterotrophic. In these ecosystems, allochthonous contributions generally exceed primary production (Golubkov et al., 2017) ; the amount of sunshine being limited by the presence of the canopy. Allochthonous organic matter such as leaf litter from riparian vegetation is, therefore, an important source of energy for these ecosystems (Mutshekwa et al., 2020). Leaf litter breakdown is therefore, a central process in the balance of organic matter in these ecosystems (Bista et al., 2017). Once in the watercourses, this organic matter is broken down and transformed by stream shredders to fine particles that can be consumed by detritivorous macroinvertebrates (González and Graça, 2020).

 

In this regard, shredder macro-invertebrates play an important role in decomposing organic matter (Augusto et al., 2019). Macro-invertebrates exclusion, which are the main actors in leaf litter breakdown, would thus reduce the loss of mass of litter (Classen Rodriguez et al., 2019). Given their importance in the functioning of aquatic ecosystems, it is important to assess the contribution of macroinvertebrates in leaf litter breakdown process. Very few studies on leaf litter breakdown have been carried out in West Africa (Tenkiano and Chauvet, 2017), especially in Côte d'Ivoire where no study has been carried out on the role of aquatic macroinvertebrates in the process of leaf litter breakdown in streams. The objectives of this study were (a) to assess leaf litter lost masses and breakdown rates, (b) to determine the contribution of macroinvertebrates involved in the leaf litter decomposition process, and (c) identify the macroinvertebrates involved in the leaf litter breakdown process.


 MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study sites and sampling stations

 

The study was conducted in three mining areas in Côte d’Ivoire namely: Tortiya in the north (diamond mining), Hiré (gold mining) and Lauzoua (manganese mining) in the south of the country between 6 and 11 weeks during 8 campaigns. The choice fell on the mining areas because of the multiplicity of mining activities in Côte d'Ivoire. Seven streams were selected (Figure 1).

 

One sampling station was defined on each stream except in stream Bou were two stations were defined. The sampling station is a very precise place with known geographical coordinates where samples are taken, where an experiment can also be carried out. Among the 7 stations (Table 1) the Bou 1 (locality of Tortiya) and N'Téko (locality of Lauzoua) stations stand out from the others since they are not found in the mining area. Indeed, they have been defined as reference station. In Hiré, no reference station could be defined because of the mining activities that take place near all the streams there.

 

 RESULTS

Lost masses of leaf litter and breakdown rates

 

The variation of lost masses in FM nets and LM are presented to Figure 2A.

 

In Hire, the percentage variations of lost masses for Lonchocarpus sericeus species was most important in Tributary Gbloh station. In FM nets the variation in lost masses was between 2 and 9% while it was between 10 and 18% in LM nets. In this same locality (Tchindegri station) the variation of the lost masses for Alchornea cordifolia species varied between 5 and 20% (FM nets) and oscillated between 7 and 28% (LM nets).

 

In Lauzoua, the variation of the lost masses for Alchornea cordifolia in FM nets oscillated between 0.8 (station Dougodou) and 20.2 (station Affluent Dougodou). The variations of lost masses for Pueraria species was between 0.2% (Dougodou station) and 40% (station N’Téko).

 

In Tortiya, the variation of lost masses for Pueraria phasoloides (station Bou 2) was between 6 and 18% (FM nets), also between 20 and 25% (LM mesh).

 

The statistical test (Mann-Whitney test, p> 0.05) showed that there was no significant difference between lost masses in FM nets and LM nets for a foliar species at the same station.

 

Leaf litter breakdown rates in the two types of nets (LM and FM) are shown in Figure 2B. In Hiré, breakdown rates in the FM nets were between 0.032 j-1 (Tributary Gbloh station, L. sericeus) and 0.04 j-1 (Gbloh station, L. sericeus) while those of the LM nets were between 0.05 and 0.07 j-1 at these same stations.

 

 

In Lauzoua, Alchornea cordifolia species breakdown rates ranged between 0.017 j-1 (N'Teko station) and 0.034 j-1 (Dougodou station) in the FM nets while those of the LM nets were between 0.035 j-1 (Affluent Dougodou station) and 0.043 j-1 (N'Teko station). At N'Teko station, the breakdown rates in LM nets were significantly higher (Mann-Whitney test, p <0.05) than those obtained in FM nets.

 

In Tortiya, breakdown rates in the FM nets were between 0.025 j-1 (station Bou 2, Pueraria phasoloides specie) and 0.029 j-1 (station Bou 1, Leptoderris brachyptera specie) ; those of the LM net oscillated between 0.031 and 0.037 j-1 at these same stations.

 

Contribution, classes and functional feeding group of macroinvertebrates involved in the process of leaf litter breakdown

 

The contribution and functional feeding group of macroinvertebrates in the process of leaf litter breakdown are shown to Figure 3A.

 

In Tortiya, their contribution oscillated between 4% (Bou 2 station, Pueraria phasoloides) and 32% (Bou 1 station, Leptoderris brachyptera). Their contribution was significantly higher (Mann -Whitney test, p <0.05) at Bou 1 station.

 

In Hiré the lowest (0.25 %) and highest (14%) values were observed in Tributary Gbloh station for L. sericeus.

 

In Lauzoua, their contribution varied between 0.37% (N’Teko station) and 48% (Tributary Dougodou station) for A. cordifolia. Among the macro-invertebrates associated with leaf litter, insect class was predominant in Lauzoua (91% of associated organisms) and Hiré (56.5%) compared to Tortiya where gastropods (77% of associated organisms) were the most abundant (Figure 3B).

 

The functional feeding groups of macro-invertebrates associated with leaf litter were dominated by predators (46% of taxa associated) and scrapers grazers (27% of taxa associated). Shredders accounted for only 1% of taxa associated with leaf litter (Table 2).

 

 

 


 DISCUSSION

Assessing the relationships between aquatic organisms and leaf litter decomposition is a key process in the functioning of waterways (Jabiol, 2010). This experiment made it possible to evaluate the contribution of macroinvertebrates at different trophic levels in the decomposition of leaf litter. Decomposition rates differ depending on the plant species. This finding would highlight the impact of the nature and quality of the plant species in the process of litter decomposition. These results corroborate those of Dangles (2004) on two plant species with different decomposition rates at similar periods of immersion. This fact would illustrate the influence of litter quality on the activity of the organisms involved in this process. This specificity essentially results from the structure and the chemical composition of the leaves, in particular in lignin and in nitrogen (Swan and Palmer, 2006). Leaf senescence could also explain the variability in decomposition rates. According to Gessner et al. (2002), decomposition rates are influenced by leaf senescence regardless of the plant species considered, especially in mining environments. During the experimental period, leaf litter decomposition rates were relatively low at all stations studied. Several studies have shown that leaf litter decomposition rates are slower in streams affected by mining activities. This result could be explained by the scarcity of grinders and shredders which play a very important role in this process. Indeed, mining activities are likely to lead to changes in the physico-chemical parameters of water. Thus the conditioning of litter by micro-organisms (bacteria and hyphomycetes) could be influenced. This situation would therefore reduce the appetite of chewing macro-invertebrates for litter, thus reducing the masses lost and the rates of decomposition. Baudoin et al. (2008) showed that micro-organisms are significantly affected by mining activities having impacts not only on nutrient intake (Cross et al., 2005) but also on protein and lipid intake essential for growth and development of macro-invertebrates (Larrañaga et al., 2010). Indeed, the micro-organisms condition the leaves in such a way that macro-invertebrates are attracted to them for food. In this study, macro-invertebrate communities associated with leaf litter were dominated primarily by predators and scraper-grazers. Macro-invertebrates are organisms that have a broad spectrum in terms of diet. In Tortiya, the contribution of macro-invertebrates was significantly high at the Bou 1 station. This result could be explained by the abundance of scraper-grazers at this station. These organisms are likely to replace the role of grinders in the leaf litter decomposition process (Graça, 2001). The contribution of macro-invertebrates differs depending on the locality and the nature of the leaves. In Lauzoua, it fluctuates between 0.37 and 48% for the species A. cordifolia. In Tortiya, this contribution fluctuates between 4 and 32%. In Hiré, it varies from 0.25 to 14%. Overall, the contribuion of macro-invertebrates is greater in Lauzoua and Tortiya and weaker in Hiré. These results reflect the importance of these organisms in the decomposition process and allow us to deduce that gold activities have a greater influence on the role of macro-invertebrates in this process compared to diamond and manganese exploitation. To reduce the impact of mining activities on the functioning of aquatic ecosystems, it would be necessary to carry out water quality assessment checks and ensure that the actors involved in mining activities comply with environmental protection standards. Periodic assessments should also be made of the impacts of these activities on the fauna of the rivers involved by listing organisms in order to identify changes in aquatic communities and to remedy them as soon as possible.


 CONCLUSION

In conclusion, we can affirm that the macroinvertebrates participate weakly in the process of decomposition of the leaf litter at the different stations studied. These relatively low degradation rates show that the ecosystem functioning of the waters of the stations studied is impacted by mining activities, thus causing a change in the functional structure of the macro-invertebrates of the streams studied.


 CONFLICT OF INTERESTS

There is no conflict of interest.


 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

The authors express their sincere gratitude to UNESCO for funding the work throughout this study.



 REFERENCES

Arias-Real R, Margarita M, Meritxell A, Francesc O, Isabel M (2018). Quality and Quantity of Leaf Litter: Both Are Important for Feeding Preferences and Growth of an Aquatic Shredder. PLoS ONE 13(12):e0208272.
Crossref

 

Augusto FG, Aline FF, Plinio BC, Luciana DC, Edmar AM, Luiz AM (2019). C3 and C4 Plant Leaf Breakdown and Assimilation by Aquatic Macroinvertebrates in Streams of the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Marine and Freshwater Research, 71(7):814-823.
Crossref

 

Bärlocher F (2005). Leaf Mass Loss Estimated by Litter Bag Technique. In Methods to Study Litter Decomposition, A Practical Guide: Springer Netherlands pp. 37-42.
Crossref

 

Barton KE, Edwards KF, Koricheva J (2019). Shifts in Woody Plant Defence Syndromes during Leaf Development. Functional Ecology 33(11):2095?2104.
Crossref

 

Baudoin JM, Guérold F, Felten V, Chauvet E, Wagner P, Rousselle P (2008). Elevated aluminium concentration in acidified headwater streams lowers aquatic hyphomycete diversity and impairs leaf-litter breakdown. Microbial Ecology 56:260-269.
Crossref

 

Benfield EF (1996). Leaf decay in stream ecosystems. In. Methods in stream ecology, Hauer F.R and Lamberti G.A (Eds), Academic Press. San Diego, California pp. 579-590.

 

Bista I, Carvalho GR, Walsh K, Semmour M, Hajibabaei M, Lallias D, Christmas M, Creer S (2017). Annual Time-Series Analysis of Aqueous EDNA Reveals Ecologically Relevant Dynamics of Lake Ecosystem Biodiversity. Nature Communications 8(1):14087.
Crossref

 

Boulton AJ, Boon P (1991). Eucalypt leaf decomposition in an intermittent stream in south-eastern Australia. Hydrobiology, 211:123-136.
Crossref

 

Classen?Rodríguez L, Pablo EGF, Alonso R (2019). Leaf Litter Decomposition and Macroinvertebrate Assemblages along an Urban Stream Gradient in Puerto Rico. Biotropica 51(5):641?651.
Crossref

 

Cross WF, Benstead JP, Frost PC, Thomas SA (2005). Ecological stoichiometry in freshwater benthic systems: Recent progress and perspectives. Freshwater Biology 50:1895-1912.
Crossref

 

Dangles O, Gessner MO, Guerold F, Chauvet E, 2004. Impacts of stream acidification on litter breakdown: implications for assessing ecosystem functioning. Journal of Applied Ecology 41(2):365-378.
Crossref

 

Day JA, Stewart BA, de Moor IJ (2001a). Guide to the Freshwater Invertebrates of Southern Africa, Crustacea III: Bathynellacea, Amphipoda, Isopoda, Spelaeogriphacea, Tanaidacea, Decapoda. Rapport N° TT 141/01 Water Research Commission, South Africa 4:58-136.

 

Day JA, Stewart BA, de Moor IJ (2001b). Guide to the Freshwater Invertebrates of Southern Africa, Diptera. Rapport N° TT 201/02 Water Research Commission, South Africa 9:78-158.

 

Dejoux C, Elouard JM, Forge P, Maslin JL (1981). Catalogue Iconographique des Insectes Aquatiques de Côte d"Ivoire. Rapport ORSTOM, Bouaké 42:175.

 

De Moor IJ, Day JA, Moor FC (2003a). Guide to the Freshwater Invertebrates of Southern Africa Insecta I: Ephemeroptera, Odonata and Plecoptera. Rapport N° TT 207/03 Water Research Commission, South Africa 7:45-258.

 

De Moor IJ, Day JA, Moor FC (2003b). Guide to the Freshwater Invertebrates of Southern Africa. Insecta II: Hemiptera, Megaloptera, Neuroptera, Trichoptera and Lepidoptera. Rapport N° TT 214/03 Water Research Commission, South Africa 8:52-159.

 

Divekar PA, Srinivasa N, Bhupendra A, Rajeev K, Basana GG, Aishwarya R (2022). Plant Secondary Metabolites as Defense Tools against Herbivores for Sustainable Crop Protection. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23(5):2690.
Crossref

 

Gessner MO, Chauvet E (2002). A case for using litter breakdown to assess functional streamintegrity. Ecological Applications 12:498-510.
Crossref

 

Golubkov S, Golubkov M, Alexei T, Vera N (2017). Long-Term Changes in Primary Production and Mineralization of Organic Matter in the Neva Estuary (Baltic Sea). Journal of Marine Systems 171:73?80.
Crossref

 

González JM, Graça MAS. (2020). The Role of Shredders in Litter Dynamics at Stream-Scale. In Methods to Study Litter Decomposition. Springer International Publishing pp. 493-499.
Crossref

 

Graça MAS (2001). The Role of Invertebrates on Leaf Litter Decomposition in Streams a Review. International Journal of Hydrobiology 86(4?5):383-393.
Crossref

 

Jabiol J (2010). Biodiversit'e et d'ecomposition des liti'eres dans les cours d'eau: influence des interactions trophiques. Biodiversité et Ecologie. Available at:

View

 

Larrañaga A, Layer K, Basaguren A, Pozo J, Woodward G (2010). Consumer body composition and community structure in a stream is altered by pH. Freshwater Biology 55:670-680.
Crossref

 

Monod T (1966). Crevettes et Crabes de la Côte occidentale d'Afrique. In. Réunion de spécialistes, C. S. A sur les Crustacés. Zanzibar pp. 103-234.

 

Mutshekwa T, Ross N, Cuthbert RJW, Florence MM, Tatenda D (2020). Macroinvertebrate colonisation associated with native and invasive leaf litter decomposition. Knowledge and Management of Aquatic Ecosystems 42(1):32.
Crossref

 

Sena G, José FGJ, Renato TM, Neusa H, Renan SR (2020). Leaf Litter Quality Drives the Feeding by Invertebrate Shredders in Tropical Streams. Ecology and Evolution 10(16):8563?8570.
Crossref

 

Stals R, De Moor IJ (2007). Guides to the Freshwater Invertebrates of Southern Africa, Volume 10: Coleoptera, Rapport N TT 320/07 Water Research Commission 263 p.

 

Swan CM, Palmer MA (2006). Composition of speciose leaf litter alters stream detritivore growth, feeding activity and leaf breakdown. Oecologia 147(3):469-478.
Crossref

 

Tachet H, Richoux P, Bournaud M, Usseglio-Polatera P (2010). Invertébrés d'eau douce: systématique, biologie, écologie, Paris: CNRS éditions 607 p.

 

Tenkiano NSD (2017). Macroinvertébrés benthiques et hyphomycètes aquatiques: diversité et implication dans le fonctionnement écosystémique des cours d'eau de Guinée. Thèse de doctorat 250 p.

 

Yoder CO, Rankin ET (1995). The Rôle of Biological Criteria in Water Quality Monitoring Assessment and Regulation. Report of Environnmental Protection Agency of State of Ohio 60 p.

 




          */?>