International Journal of
Biodiversity and Conservation

  • Abbreviation: Int. J. Biodivers. Conserv.
  • Language: English
  • ISSN: 2141-243X
  • DOI: 10.5897/IJBC
  • Start Year: 2009
  • Published Articles: 679

Full Length Research Paper

On-farm Musa germplasm diversity in different agro-ecologies of Burundi

W. Ocimati1*, G. Blomme1, D. Karamura1, P. Ragama2, P. Lepoint3, J. P. Kanyaruguru3, F. Ngezahayo4, V. Ndungo5 and S. Hakizimana4
1Bioversity International, P.O. Box 24384, Kampala, Uganda. 2Kabarak University, Private Bag 20157, Kabarak, Nakuru, Kenya. 3Bioversity International/CIALCA Project, P.O. Box 7180, Bujumbura, Burundi. 4IRAZ, Mashitsi, Burundi. 5Université Catholique de Graben, Butembo, North Kivu, DR Congo.
Email: [email protected]

  •  Accepted: 05 September 2013
  •  Published: 30 November 2013

Abstract

Burundi is part of the secondary centre of diversity for the east African highland bananas (Musa AAA-EA). However, Musa diversity in Burundi has declined in the past two decades due to pests, diseases and civil unrest. A Musa germplasm diagnostic survey carried out in three provinces- Gitega in Central, Kirundo in Northern and Cibitoke in north-western Burundi, assessed on-farm Musa diversity, Musaselection criteria influencing Musa diversity and genetic erosion. Musa diversity was determined by the number and relative abundance of Musa cultivars in the study communities. Thirty-three (33) cultivars were recorded across the three provinces. Gitega and Kirundo had a higher Musa diversity than Cibitoke. Low Musa diversity in Cibitoke can be attributed to the existence of a few cultivars adapted to the low altitude; specialization in beer types for the market and the effect of diseases. Though 11 cultivars were widely grown, only four covered 77% of the Burundian banana landscape. These cultivars have a high market potential. The less common cultivars are vulnerable to genetic erosion and hence their conservation is recommended. Flavour, pulp taste and juice quality; and market demand/prices greatly influenced cultivars maintained on farm. 30% of the respondents experienced cultivar erosion, with 69% reporting loss in Cibitoke, 29% in Kirundo and 19% in Gitega. Diseases (89%) were the major cause of this loss. ‘Kamaramasenge’ (AAB), ‘Igisubi’ (ABB) and ‘Pisang awak’ (ABB), respectively were the most affected cultivars. Banana bunchy top disease indiscriminately affects Musacultivars in the low altitude regions, while the AAB dessert types and the ABB beer types are affected by Fusarium wilt. The high disease burden at low altitudes could partially be responsible for the low Musadiversity in Cibitoke.

 Key words: Cultivar diversity, cultivar evenness;,genetic erosion, Musa germplasm.