Journal of
Agricultural Biotechnology and Sustainable Development

  • Abbreviation: J. Agric. Biotech. Sustain. Dev.
  • Language: English
  • ISSN: 2141-2340
  • DOI: 10.5897/JABSD
  • Start Year: 2009
  • Published Articles: 144

Full Length Research Paper

Biochemical evaluation of autoclaved and solid state fermented tropical pasture grasses

Theresa Ezedom
  • Theresa Ezedom
  • Department of Medical Biochemistry, Faculty of Basic Medical Sciences, Delta State University, Abraka, Nigeria.
  • Google Scholar
Egoamaka Egbune
  • Egoamaka Egbune
  • Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Science, Delta State University, Abraka, Nigeria.
  • Google Scholar
Marian Ehikordi
  • Marian Ehikordi
  • Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Science, Delta State University, Abraka, Nigeria.
  • Google Scholar
Nwabuaku Ezeugo
  • Nwabuaku Ezeugo
  • Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Science, Delta State University, Abraka, Nigeria.
  • Google Scholar
Favour Eledu
  • Favour Eledu
  • Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Science, Delta State University, Abraka, Nigeria.
  • Google Scholar
Juliet Esiete
  • Juliet Esiete
  • Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Science, Delta State University, Abraka, Nigeria.
  • Google Scholar
Joan Eriamiator
  • Joan Eriamiator
  • Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Science, Delta State University, Abraka, Nigeria.
  • Google Scholar
Oluchukwu Ezeugo
  • Oluchukwu Ezeugo
  • Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Science, Delta State University, Abraka, Nigeria.
  • Google Scholar
Charity Friday
  • Charity Friday
  • Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Science, Delta State University, Abraka, Nigeria.
  • Google Scholar
Chidiebere Egholenwa
  • Chidiebere Egholenwa
  • Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Science, Delta State University, Abraka, Nigeria.
  • Google Scholar
Ernest Ekene
  • Ernest Ekene
  • Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Science, Delta State University, Abraka, Nigeria.
  • Google Scholar
Success Efemevotor
  • Success Efemevotor
  • Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Science, Delta State University, Abraka, Nigeria.
  • Google Scholar
Nyerhovwo Tonukari
  • Nyerhovwo Tonukari
  • Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Science, Delta State University, Abraka, Nigeria.
  • Google Scholar


  •  Received: 26 May 2022
  •  Accepted: 27 June 2022
  •  Published: 31 July 2022

 ABSTRACT

Grass constitutes the nutritional basis for most livestock, whether domesticated or wildlife. The present study evaluates the enhancement of the nutritional value of five different pasture grasses: Palisade grass (Urochloa brizantha), Biscuit grass (Paspalum vaginatum), Giant star grass (Cynodon plectostachyus), Goose grass (Eleusine indica), and Stubborn grass (Sida acuta) for use as animal feeds and xylanase production. The grasses received two different treatments:  Autoclaving and solid state fermentation. Analysis carried out on untreated, autoclaved and solid state fermented grasses showed an increase in pH for all autoclaved grasses and solid state fermented grasses when compared to the control. The total flavonoid content was significantly improved in the solid state fermented grasses (116.7 ±1.4 μg/ml for palisade grass). There was a significant increase (p<0.05) in soluble protein content from 21.86 ± 1.7 to 44.06 ± 1.3 mg g-1 of palisade grass fermented with Rhizopus oligosporus. Similarly, there was a substantial rise (p < 0.05) in glucose concentration of solid state fermented biscuit grass (54.6 ± 3.3 mg g-1) when compared to the control (32.4±1.6 mg g-1). The total flavonoid content was improved in the solid state fermented (73.53 ± 0.35 μg/ml for biscuit grass) compared to the control (64.6±3.35μg/ml). Biscuit grass subjected to solid state fermentation was more potentially active (62.4±1.3μg/ml) when compared to the control (42.2 ± 0.9 μg/ml). For xylanase production, solid state fermented goose grass showed the highest enzymatic activity. These results indicate that solid state fermentation enhanced the nutritional value and antioxidant profile of grasses, which can also be used in livestock feeding and as a substrate for the production of xylanase.

Key words: Grasses, animal feeds, solid state fermentation, xylanase, autoclave.


 INTRODUCTION

Forage resources for livestock production are quite enormous worldwide, but they face challenges related to availability, quality and productivity of  pastures.  Different feed additives have been added to commercial feed to improve the quality of livestock feed. This includes the use of antioxidants, which  help  in  the prevention of lipid peroxidation and oxidative rancidity. It has been shown that foods rich in polyunsaturated fatty acids are highly susceptible to lipid peroxidation (Decker et al., 2012). Thus, the inclusion of exogenous antioxidants in livestock feeds aids in the prevention of the destruction of essential nutrients (Calabotta and Shermer, 1985) as well as the preservation of the feed's sensory qualities (Halliwell and Gutteridge, 1999; Surai, 2007; Kalam et al., 2012).

Natural antioxidants obtained from plants’ phytochemicals have been shown to be capable of inhibiting the generation of reactive oxygen species (Moukette et al., 2015). These compounds are phenolic in nature and consist of, among others, flavonoids, phenolic acids, tocopherols and carotenoids (Dubey et al., 2014). According to Balasundram et al. (2006), phenolic compounds are major determinants of food antioxidant potential. Flavonoids, which are secondary plant metabolites, consist of flavanols, anthocyanidins, flavones, and isoflavones (Hollman, 2004). The consumption of dietary antioxidants in adequate quantity has been shown to protect against free radical activity. It also plays a significant role in disease prevention (Alam et al., 2013).

Antioxidants have been defined as substances that when present in feeds and foods at a concentration lower than that of an oxidizable substrate will significantly interrupt or avert the oxidation of the substrate (Halliwell and Gutteridge, 1999). According to Hilton (1989) and Decker (1998), substances that exhibit antioxidative capacity include oxygen scavengers, deactivators’ of peroxides and other reactive oxygen species, free radical scavengers, quenchers of secondary lipid oxidation products that produce rancid odors and metalchelates. Antioxidants used in animal feeds can be broadly categorized into natural and synthetic ones. However, the excessive use of synthetic antioxidants may be implicated in carcinogenic and/or mutagenic effects on consumers (Fellenberg and Speisky, 2006). Thus, nutritionists are now searching for the natural antioxidants for animal feeds.

Grasses are monocotyledonous plants that belong to the Poaceae or Gramineae family (Dashora and Gosavi, 2013). They are widely spread and abundant (Hubbard, 1954). They can be classified as annual, biennial or perennial. Grasses grow in many areas, but some are restricted to particular areas due to climatic and environmental conditions (Milton, 2004). They have different adaptability to many locations and tenacity. Grass constitutes the nutritional basis for most livestock. Whether domesticated or wildlife, grass is the mainstay of some livestock. In order to improve the nutritional quality of grass, various processing techniques have been applied (Simeão et al., 2021; Chandel et al., 2021; Egbune et al., 2021b). Solid state fermentation involves the growth of microorganisms on substrates with limited water content (Dulf et al., 2017). Studies have shown that various agricultural by-products can be enhanced by solid state fermentation (Bennett and Yang, 2012; Dulf et al., 2016; Jin et al., 2016). Solid state fermentation has been widely used in the feedstock industry to promote nutrient utilization (Chi and Cho, 2016; Wang et al., 2018a; Egbune et al., 2021d). An autoclave is an application, which is generally used for heat treatments. When this application is used on cereals and other plant-based foods, it activates the phytase enzyme as well as increases acidity (Ertop and Bekta? 2018).

The demand for animal protein for human nutrition in the developing world is still increasing, particularly for chicken products, and the cost of livestock feed concentrates is rising (Naylor et al., 2021; Egbune et al., 2021b). As a result, in order to satisfy the nutritional needs of chickens, new low-cost feed alternatives must be identified. Forages used as feed for monogastric animals, particularly poultry, help to increase the sustainability of animal production in farming systems (Lüscher et al., 2014) Plants generate a wide range of anti-nutritional chemicals, many of which have been discovered and described. Polyphenols, cyanogenic glycosides, alkaloids, saponins, steroids, toxic proteins and amino acids, non-protein amino acids, phytohemagglutinins, triterpenes, and oxalic acid are the most prevalent main groupings that are either poisonous or anti-nutritive (Ali et al., 2022). Secondary compounds can have a significant impact on the nutritional content and feeding value of both temperate and tropical forages and these effects can be advantageous in certain cases while being harmful in others. However, forage plants may be effectively treated to improve palatability, intake, and digestibility, as well as to save, detoxify, or concentrate nutrients. This present study aims to evaluate the efficacy of two pretreatment techniques for processing common grasses consumed by ruminants.


 MATERIALS AND METHODS

Collection of grasses and treatments

Palisade grass (Urochloa brizantha), Biscuit grass (Paspalum vaginatum), Giant star grass (Cynodon plectostachyus), and Goose grass (Eleusine indica) were harvested from Delta State University, Abraka, Delta state and was identified and authenticated in the Department of Botany, University of Benin, Edo State, Nigeria with Voucher number: UBH-P288, UBH-P151, UBH-C334 and UBH-P398, respectively. The samples were pulverized using a commercial grinding machine (SM-1 Retsch GmbH, 5667 HAAN) and stored at room temperature. Rhizopus oligosporus strains for solid state fermentation were obtained from the Harmony Path, Ltd. laboratory located at Songhai in Amukpe, Sapele, Delta State. Solid state fermentation was carried out according to the method described by Ofuya and Nwajiuba (1990), at pH 6 in bio-fermenter using 50 mM phosphate buffers at room temperature for 72 h. One gram (1 g) of each grass sample (1.4 × 102 CFU) was homogenized in 10 ml of prepared phosphate at pH 6 in a bio fermenter. 10 g of the ground palisade grass was used in the homogenization step and allowed to ferment for a 72 h period at room temperature. The autoclaving of the grasses was done at 121°C for 30 min. Unfermented  control   samples   (containing   dried   and  grounded palisade grass, devoid of any presence of molds, with buffer only, and without any cells) were prepared alongside the test samples. After fermentation and autoclaving, 6 g of the mixtures were measured, and 40 ml of distilled water was added and homogenized using mortar r and pestle. 10 ml of the mixture was collected into a test tube and centrifuged for 10 min to get the crude extract. This supernatant (crude extract) was used as the crude extract or sample for the various assays which were carried out in triplicates.

Biochemical assays

The method of Gornall et al. (1949) was employed in assaying for total soluble proteins using bovine serum albumin as the standard. pH of the sample was measured using a Mettler Toledo pH meter. The colorimetric estimation of reducing sugars was done using the method of Miller (1959). Glucose level was assayed as described in the Randox glucose kit following the manufacturer's (Randox Laboratories Ltd, County Antrimm BT29 4QY, United Kingdom) instructions. Antioxidant inhibition of 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radical, total phenol and flavonoid contents were determined based on the procedures of Hatano et al. (1988), Singleton and Rossi (1965), and Jia et al. (1999), respectively. One unit of xylanase activity (U) was defined as the amount of the enzyme required to liberate 1 μmol of xylose per min under the assay conditions. The yields were expressed as U per gram dry substrate.

Statistical analysis

Data obtained were expressed as mean ± standard deviation and analyzed using analysis of variance (ANOVA). Comparism of the various group means was done using Fischer test of least significance (LSD). P-values less than 0.05 (p<0.05).is considered significant at 95% confidence level.


 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Changes in pH values of Palisade, Biscuit, Giant star and Goose grasses after the various treatments are shown in Figure 1.

Results obtained showed a decreased in pH values for autoclaved grasses while the solid state fermented grasses showed an increase in pH values. The initial pH of solid state fermented palisade grass increased from 6.0 to 7.0 at the end of the 72 h fermentation period for all grasses, which is an indication of the favorable state of solid state fermentation of grasses. Most micro-organisms function optimally at neutrality, while a few require an alkaline environment. Inhibition of microbial activities has been recorded for acidic pH (Aganbi et al., 2020).

Thus, a shift in the pH during the fermentation process could have been contributed by the strong proteolysis of the fungi R. oligosporus. This is in accordance with the report of Owens et al. (1997), who reported a rise in pH value from 4.5 to 8.5 in soybean fermentation. This was associated with a strong ammoniacal odour due to the hydrolysis of seed protein and resultant amino acid metabolism.

The outcomes of the determination of the levels of proteins, glucose and reducing sugars in the various pretreatments of the grasses are shown in Figures 2 to 4. There was a substantial increase (p<0.05) in soluble protein content from 33.1±0.8 to 64.7±0.9 mg g-1 of biscuit grass fermented with R. oligosporus, while there was a total decline in the levels of soluble protein in other pretreatments. The increase in the level of soluble protein of the solid state fermented grasses could be attributed to the production of extracellular enzymes such as hemicellulase, cellulase, and lignases to make use of carbon sources in the substrate.

These extracellular enzymes are protein-based and could have contributed to the protein biomass of the substrate (Sharma et al., 2017; Akassou and Groleau, 2019; Ong and Lee, 2021). According to Elyas et al. (2002), this could also be as a result of the synthesis of proteins from metabolic intermediates during their growth cycles. It could also be as a result of a change in dry matter content by the action of the fermenting microorganisms (Cai et al., 2019; Egbune et al., 2021c).  

The results of the present study show a general increase in the level of glucose in the solid state fermented grasses when compared to the control. There was a substantial rise (p<0.05) in glucose concentration of solid state fermented biscuit grass (54.6±3.3 mg g-1) when compared to the control (32.4±1.6 mg g-1). Anigboro et al. (2020) and Da Silva et al. (2019) have also reported increase in glucose level upon R. oligosporus fermentation of maize (Zea mays) offal. The potential hydrolysis of complex carbohydrates such as sucrose, pectin, cellulose, etc. has been shown to increase the level of glucose in a substrate (Marques et al., 2016; Murthy and Naidu, 2011).

The results of the determination of reducing sugar concentration in the different pretreatments of the five different grasses are shown in Figure 4. Fermented grasses showed a significant level of reducing sugar compared to the control. This could be as a result of the substrate being degraded and used as a carbon source. Similar observations have been recorded by Kolo et al. (2020).

The results of the determination of total phenolic content and total flavonoid content in the different pretreatments of the different grasses are shown in Figures 5 and 6. There was a significant increase (p < 0.05) in total phenolic content from untreated goose grass (Control)  (26.5 ± 0.9 mg g-1 ) to 77.6 ± 5.4 mg g-1 in solid state fermented goose grass using R. oligosporus.

A general increase in the total phenolic content was observed across the various pretreatments for all grasses. An increase in the level of total phenolic content in all grasses could be attributed to the release of free total phenolic content from the bound state, thereby improving bioavailability by the proteolytic activities of fungi (Dey et al., 2016). Phenolic compounds have been shown   to   have   antioxidant  and  anticancer   activities (Balasundram et al., 2006). Solid-state fermentation has the potentials to increase the organoleptic and nutritional properties of food. It has also been shown to be capable of converting agro-industrial residues or plants into valuable phenolic compounds (Liu et al., 2017; Martins et al., 2011). The total flavonoid content was improved in the solid state fermented grasses (116.7 ± 1.4 μg/ml) when compared to the control. The highest level of total flavonoid content was obtained in all grasses in the solid state fermentation at 72 h fermentation. Phenolic compounds and flavonoids are well known antioxidants.

Figure 7 shows the free radical scavenging activities in the different pretreatments of the grasses as compared to the control. The result showed that grasses subjected to solid state fermentation had a higher level of free radical scavenging activity compared to the control. Observed changes in the free radical scavenging ability of the solid state fermented elephant grass have been attributed to the process of fermentation, which could have generated secondary metabolites (Martins et al., 2011) Fermentation also involves the structural breakdown of plant cell walls.

This could indirectly increase the levels of antioxidant compounds (Hur et al., 2014).

The activities of xylanase differ markedly with the different pretreatments of the different grasses. However, generally, there  was  a  significant increase (p < 0.05)  in xylanase activity in solid state fermented grasses when compared to the control. Thus, in the absence of fermentation, that is, in control, the levels of nitrogen could be too low to support growth and enzyme production and growth (Tai et al., 2019; Egbune et al., 2021a).

Xylanase is the enzyme that converts the linear polysaccharide xylan to xylose (Malgas and Pletschke, 2019; Javed et al., 2019). This is a major component of plant cell walls. Thus, this enzyme plays an important part in the breakdown of plant materials into useable nutrients by microorganisms that rely on plants for nourishment, such as grass.


 CONCLUSION

Conclusively, the present study has shown that solid state fermentation could improve the antioxidant and nutritive values (proteins, glucose and reducing sugar) of different grasses. Thus, solid state fermentation could be applied industrially to reduce the availability of quality feed for livestock. The ability of solid state fermented elephant grass to enhance the level of production of xylanase further helps in ensuring the bioavailability of nutrients  in  the  plants for  absorption. The  observation from the preceding study is significant to accelerating forage optimization using solid-state bio-processing approach. The functional and nutritional qualities of the solid-state fermented forages demonstrated that they might be useful components in feed compositions.


 CONFLICT OF INTERESTS

The authors have not declared any conflict of interests.



 REFERENCES

Aganbi E, Anigboro AA, Tonukari NJ (2020).Changes in glucose, amylase and soluble proteins levels in solid state fermented yam (Dioscorea Spp.) peels by Rhizopus oligosporus. Nigerian Journal of Science and Environment 18(1):161-167.

 

Akassou M, Groleau D (2019). Advances and challenges in the production of extracellular thermoduric pullulanases by wild-type and recombinant microorganisms: a review. Critical Reviews in Biotechnology 39(3):337-350.
Crossref

 
 

Alam MN, Bristi NJ, Rafiquzzaman M (2013). Review on in vivo and in vitro methods evaluation of antioxidant activity. Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal 21(2):143-152.
Crossref

 
 

Ali A, Devarajan S, Manickavasagan A, Ata A (2022).Antinutritional Factors and Biological Constraints in the Utilization of Plant Protein Foods. In: Manickavasagan, A, Lim LT, Ali A (eds) Plant Protein Foods. Springer, Cham.
Crossref

 
 

Anigboro AA, Aganbi E, Tonukari NJ (2020).Solid state fermentation of maize (Zea mays) offal by Rhizopusoligosporus under acidic and basic conditions.Journal of Scientific Research 12(4):751-756.
Crossref

 
 

Balasundram N, Sundram K, Samman S (2006). Phenolic compounds in plants and agri-industrial by-products: Antioxidant activity, occurrence, and potential uses. Food Chemistry 99(1):191-203.
Crossref

 
 

Bennett P, Yang ST (2012).Beneficial effect of protracted sterilization of lentils on phytase production by Aspergillusficuum in solid state fermentation. Biotechnology Progress 28(5):1263-1270. doi: 10.1002/btpr.1603.
Crossref

 
 

Cai YX, Wang JH, McAuley C, Augustin MA, Terefe NS (2019). Fermentation for enhancing the bioconversion of glucoraphanin into sulforaphane and improve the functional attributes of broccoli puree. Journal of Functional Food 61:103461. ISSN 1756-4646, 
Crossref

 
 

Calabotta DF, Shermer WD (1985). Controlling feed oxidation can be rewarding. Feedstuffs 57(48):24-32.

 
 

Chandel AK, Forte MBS, Gonçalves IS, Milessi TS, Arruda PV, Carvalho W, Mussatto SI (2021). Brazilian biorefineries from second generation biomass: critical insights from industry and future perspectives. Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining 15(4):1190-1208.
Crossref

 
 

Chi CH, Cho SJ (2016).Improvement of bioactivity of soybean meal by solid-state fermentation with Bacillus amyloliquefaciens versus Lactobacillus spp. and Saccharomyces cerevisiae. LWT - Food Science and Technology 68:425-431. 
Crossref

 
 

Da Silva Vale, A de Melo Pereira GV, de CarvalhoNeto DP, Rodrigues C, Pagnoncelli MGB, Soccol CR (2019). Effect of co-inoculation with Pichiafermentans and Pediococcusacidilactici on metabolite produced during fermentation and volatile composition of coffee beans. Fermentation 5(3):67.
Crossref

 
 

Dashora K, Gosavi KVC (2013). Grasses: an underestimated medicinal repository. Journal of Medicinal Plants Studies 1(3):151-157.

 
 

Decker EA (1998). Antioxidant mechanisms In Akoh CC, DB Min (Eds.), Food lipids: chemistry, nutrition and biotechnology, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA pp. 397-421

 
 

Decker EA, Akoh CC, Wilkes RS (2012). Incorporation of (n-3) fatty acids in foods: challenges and opportunities. Journal of Nutrition 142(3):610S-613S.
Crossref

 
 

Dey TB, Chakraborty S, Jain KK, Sharma A, Kuhad RC (2016). Antioxidant phenolics and their microbial production by submerged and solid state fermentation process: A review. Trends in Food Science and Technology 53(1) 60-74.
Crossref

 
 

Dubey NK, Kedia A, Prakash B, Kishore N (2014). Plants of Indian traditional medicine with antioxidant activity.In Dubey, N.K. (Ed.).Plants as a source of natural antioxidants, pp. 1-2. CABI.
Crossref

 
 

Dulf FV, Vodnar DC, Socaciu C (2016). Effects of solid-state fermentation with two filamentous fungi on the total phenolic contents, flavonoids, antioxidant activities and lipid fractions of plum fruit (Prunusdomestica L.) by-products. Food Chemistry 209:27-36. 
Crossref

 
 

Dulf FV, Vodnar DC, Dulf EH, Pintea A (2017). Phenolic compounds, armeniaca, lipids and antioxidant potential of apricot (Prunusarmeniaca L.) pomace fermented by two filamentous fungal strains in solid state system. Chemistry Central Journal 11:92.
Crossref

 
 

Egbune EO, Avwioroko OJ, Anigboro AA, Aganbi E, Amata A, Tonukari, NJ (2022). Characterization of a surfactant-stable α-amylase produced by solid-state fermentation of cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) tubers using Rhizopus oligosporus Kinetics, thermal inactivation thermodynamics and potential application in laundry industries. Biocatalysis and Agricultural Biotechnology 39-102290.
Crossref

 
 

Egbune EO, Eze E, Edwards RA, Ezedom T, Tonukari NJ ((2021a) Enhancement of the nutritional value of elephant grass (Pennisetum Schum.).) for use as animal feeds and for xylanase production. Nigerian Journal of Science and Environment 19(2).

 
 

Egbune EO, Ezedom T, Tonukari NJ (2021c).Inclusion of a locally produced animal performance supplement in broilers' ration. Nigerian Journal of Science and Environment 19(2).

 
 

Egbune EO, Orhonigbe I, Adheigu RO, Oniyan UP, Tonukari NJ (2021b). Effect of inoculum size on solid state fermentation of pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum)) by Rhizopus oligosporus. Nigerian Journal of Science and Environment 20(1):1-9.

 
 

Elyas SH, El Tinay AH, Yousif NE, Elsheikh EA (2002).Effect of natural fermentation on nutritive value and in vitro protein digestibility of pearl millet. Food Chemistry 78(1):75-79.
Crossref

 
 

Ertop H, Bekta? M (2018).Enhancement of bioavailable micronutrients and reduction of antinutrients in foods with some processes. Food and Health 4(3):159-165. 
Crossref

 
 

Fellenberg MA, Speisky H (2006). Antioxidants: their effects on broiler oxidative stress and its meat oxidative stability. World's Poultry Science Journal 62:53-70.
Crossref

 
 

Gornall AG, Bardawill CJ, David MM (1949). Determination of serum proteins by means of the biuret reaction. Journal of Biological Chemistry 177(2):751-756.
Crossref

 
 

Halliwell B, Gutteridge JMC (1999).Free radicals in biology and medicine, Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK.

 
 

Hatano T, Kagawa H, Yasuhara T Okuda T (1988). Two New Flavonoids and Other Constituents in Licore Root: Their Relative Astringency and Radical Scavenging Affects. Chemical and Pharmaceutical Bulletin 36(6):2090-2097.
Crossref

 
 

Hilton JW (1989). Antioxidants: function, types and necessity of inclusion in pet foods. Canadian Veterinary Journal 30:682

 
 

Hollman PCH (2004). Absorption, bioavailability, and metabolism of flavonoids. Pharmaceutical biology pp. 74-83.Taylor and Francis Ltd.
Crossref

 
 

Hubbard CE (1954). Grasses: A guide to their structure, identification, uses, and distribution in the British Isles. Penguin Books, London.

 
 

Hur SJ, Lee SY, Kim Y, Choi I, Kim G (2014). Effect of fermentation on the antioxidant activity in plant-based foods. Food Chemistry 160:346-356.
Crossref

 
 

Javed U, Ansari A, Aman A, UlQader SA (2019). Fermentation and saccharification of agro-industrial wastes: A cost-effective approach for dual use of plant biomass wastes for xylose production. Biocatalysis and Agricultural Biotechnology 21:101341.
Crossref

 
 

Jia Z, Tang M, Wu J (1999). The determination of flavonoid contents of murlberry and their scavenging effects on superoxide radicals. Food Chemistry 64:555-559.
Crossref

 
 

Jin B, Zepf F, Bai Z, Gao B, Zhu N (2016). A biotech-systematic approach to select fungi for bioconversion of winery biomass wastes to nutrient-rich feed.Process Safety and Environmental Protection 103:60-68. 
Crossref

 
 

Kalam S, Singh R, Mani A, Patel J, Khan FN, Pandey A (2012). Antioxidants: elixir of life. International Multidisciplinary Research Journal 2:18-34

 
 

Kolo SMD, Wahyuningrum D, Hertadi R (2020). The effects of microwave-assisted pretreatment and cofermentation on bioethanol production from elephant grass. International Journal of Microbiology, 1-11.
Crossref

 
 

Liu L, Zhang R, Deng Y, Zhang Y, Xiao J, Huang F, Zhang M (2017). Fermentation and complex enzyme hydrolysis enhance total phenolics and antioxidant activity of aqueous solution from rice bran pretreated by steaming with αamylase. Food Chemistry 221:636-643.
Crossref

 
 

Lüscher A, Mueller-Harvey I, Soussana JF, Rees RM, Peyraud JL (2014). Potential of legume-based grassland-livestock systems in Europe: A review. Grass Forage Science 69:206-228.
Crossref

 
 

Malgas S, Pletschke BI (2019). The effect of an oligosaccharide reducing-end xylanase, BhRex8A, on the synergistic degradation of xylan backbones by an optimisedxylanolytic enzyme cocktail. Enzyme and Microbial Technology 122:74-81.
Crossref

 
 

Marques WL, Raghavendran V, Stambuk BU, Gombert AK (2016). Sucrose and Saccharomyces cerevisiae: A relationship most sweet. FEMS Yeast Research 16 (1):fov107.
Crossref

 
 

Martins S, Mussatto SI, Martínez-Avila G, Montañez-Saenz J, Aguilar C. N, Teixeira JA (2011). Bioactive phenolic compounds: Production and extraction by solid-state fermentation. A review. Biotechnology Advances 29(3):365-373.
Crossref

 
 

Miller GL (1959). Use of the Dinitrosalicylic acid reagent for the determination of reducing sugar. Analytical Chemistry 31:426-428.
Crossref

 
 

Milton S.J. (2004). Grasses as invasive alien plants in South Africa. South African Journal of Science 100:69-75.

 
 

Moukette BM, Pieme CA, Njimou JQ, Biapa CPN, Marco B, Ngogang, JY (2015). In vitro antioxidant properties, free radicals scavenging activities of extracts and polyphenol composition of a non-timber forest product used as spice: Monodoramyristica. Biological Research 48(1):15
Crossref

 
 

Murthy PS, Naidu M (2011). Improvement of robusta coffee fermentation with microbial enzymes. European Journal of Applied Sciences 3:130-139.

 
 

Naylor RL, Hardy RW, Buschmann AH, Bush SR, Cao L, Klinger D. H Troell M (2021). A 20-year retrospective review of global aquaculture. Nature 591(7851):551-563. 
Crossref

 
 

Ofuya CO, Nwajiuba CJ (1990). Microbial degradation and utilization of cassava peel. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 6(2):144-148. 
Crossref

 
 

Ong A, Lee CK (2021).Cooperative metabolism in mixed culture solid-state fermentation. LWT 152, 112300.ISSN 0023-6438, 
Crossref

 
 

Owens JD, Allagheny N, Kipping G, AMES JM (1997). Formation of volatile compounds during Bacillus subtilis fermentation of soya beans. Journal of Science of Food and Agriculture 74:132-140.
Crossref

 
 

Sharma HK, Xu C, Qin W (2017). Biological pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass for biofuels and bioproducts: An Overview. Waste and Biomass Valorization 10(2):235-251.
Crossref

 
 

Simeão RM, Resende MDV, Alves RS, Pessoa-Filho M, Azevedo ALS, Jones CS, Pereira JF, Machado JC (2021). Genomic selection in tropical forage grasses: current status and future applications. Frontiers in Plant Science 12:665195.
Crossref

 
 

Singleton VL, Rossi JA (1965). Colorimetry of total phenolics with phosphomolybdic-phosphotungstic acid reagents. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture 16(3):144-158.

 
 

Surai PF (2007). Natural antioxidants in poultry nutrition: new developments. In Proceedings of the 16th European Symposium on Poultry Nutrition, 26-30 August, Strasbourg, France pp. 669-675.

 
 

Tai WY, Tan JS, Lim V, Lee CK (2019). Comprehensive studies on optimization of cellulase and xylanase production by a local indigenous fungus strain via solid state fermentation using oil palm frond as substrate. Biotechnology Progress 35(3):e2781. 
Crossref

 
 

Wang J, Cao F, Su E, Zhao L, Qin W (2018a). Improvement of animal feed additives of ginkgo leaves through solid-state fermentation using Aspergillus niger.. International Journal of Biological Sciences 14(7):736. 
Crossref

 

 

 




          */?>