ABSTRACT
Sunflower is one of the most important oleaginous crops designated for edible oil production in the world. However, Brazilian growers still do not have enough knowledge, and technical expertise, for expanding the sunflower crop yield through the adoption of new technologies, like the utilization of plant growth regulators (paclobutrazol). The aim of this work was to evaluate the effects of different doses (0, 50, 100, 150 and 200 mL ha-1) of the growth regulator paclobutrazol on agronomic characteristics of sunflower crop in Uberlandia, Minas Gerais State, Brazil. Treating the seed with paclobutrazol decreased the size of the disk flowers and the plant height, while the number of days to complete the development cycle increased. The yield was not affected by the different doses. The use of paclobutrazol in seed treatment is an interesting tool to manage the development of the sunflower crop, as it affects desirable parameters which does not reduce seed yield.
Key words: Helianthus annuus L., paclobutrazol, biorregulator.
Sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) is one of the main oleaginous crops designated for edible oil production in the world. In the 2014/2015 agricultural year, a yield of 1,376 kg ha-1 was reached in Brazil, resulting from 109.4 thousand hectares cultivated with this crop (CONAB, 2015).
Considering the higher resistance to heat, drought and cold than most of the species grown in Brazil (Lima et al.,
2014), sunflower areas expanded with about 25% in 2014/2015 as compared to the agricultural year of 2013/2014 (CONAB, 2015). This crop has received more attention due to its good results as an option to succession planting and crop rotation, animal feed, honey production and functional human nutrition (Faria et al., 2015; Ungaro et al., 2009). Furthermore, since 2010, the Brazilian government demands that all diesel commercialized in Brazil should be admixed with at least 5% of biodiesel (Matsumoto et al., 2015).
Even with the increasing demand of this product, Brazilian production is still low, for example only 1.5 Russian production, and is about half of the Israeli average yield (FAO, 2015). Growers in Brazil still do not have enough experience with sunflower; neither have capacitated technical assistance to expand the yield of this crop. One example of applicable technology is the utilization of plant hormones and growth regulators, which is insufficiently explored in this crop (Spitzer et al., 2011)
One of the currently used plant growth regulators in agriculture is paclobutrazol. This compound is a triazole derivative known for its inhibitory activity against sterol and gibberellin synthesis (Rademacher, 2000; Khan et al., 2009). It affects some aspects of the plant such as height and flowering, due to alterations in phytohormone levels (Kim et al., 2012). These modifications are interesting for sunflower production due to the high susceptibility of this crop to lodging, which is correlated to its considerable height and weight of its disk flower (Sposaro et al., 2008).
However, its results depend on the applied concen-trations, number, the moment of applications, and target (foliar or soil) (Almeida And Pereira, 1996; Koutoubras et al., 2014). Furthermore, there are just a few studies on the use of paclobutrazol in seed treatment (Melo et al., 2014, 2015). Due to these facts, the utilization of this hormone in the sunflower crop still requires more studies.
The aim of this work is to evaluate the effects of different doses of seed treatment with paclobutrazol in agronomic characteristics related to the sunflower crop production in Uberlandia, Minas Gerais State, Brazil.
This work was conducted in 2015 at an experimental area in Heliagro Agricultura e Pecuária (24°20’32’’ S; 53°51’36’’ W), located in Uberlandia, Brazil. The region has an average altitude of 830 m and weather classified as Aw according to Köppen classification and it is considered a tropical wet climate but with a pronounced dry season (Ribeiro et al., 2013).
It was established as a randomised block design, with five replications for each treatment. The treatments were based on different doses of paclobutrazol: 0 (Control), 50, 100, 150 and 200 mL ha-1. Each plot consisted of four rows of six meters with a space of 0.7 m from the other, comprising 80 plants each one; the distance between plots was 1 m.
The paclobutrazol solution was obtained from a commercial product registered as Cultar 250 SC. The different doses were applied inside a plastic bag with the seeds, followed by intense agitation for good coverage of the seeds. The chosen variety of sunflower was the simple hybrid Helio 251, recommended for all the Central Brazilian territory (Porto et al., 2008)
The sowing was in March manually and jab “matraca” planter was used. After emergence and initial development of seedlings, some of them were removed to avoid intraspecific competition and to establish a population of 45,000 plants ha-1.
During sowing, 350 kg ha-1 of the fertilizer 8-20-20, related to the concentrations of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium, respectively, was applied in the furrows. Twenty days after the crop emergence, there was a side dressing fertilization with 150 kg ha-1 of ammonium nitrate. Also, there were applications of 10 kg ha-1 of sodium octaborate, diluted in water and applied to the soil while sowing and ten days after the crop emergence. The fertilization was based on soil fertility analysis to meet the nutritional requirements of the crop described by Ribeiro et al. (1998).
For the evaluations, only the two central rows of each parcel were considered. The height of the plants was measured from the soil to the upper leaf at flowering (considering 50% of the plants with 50% open flowers). The average size of the disk flowers was assessed at harvesting by measuring the length between the extremities of the structure. After the manual harvest, the achenes were taken to the laboratory to be separated from the seeds, which were weighted to determine the production of each parcel and from those results, the estimated yield (kg ha-1) was calculated.
The results were submitted for normality test of residuals (Shapiro-Wilk test) and homogeneity of variance (Bartlett test) using the SPSS software. The variance analysis was assessed using F-test with 5% significance variance analysis. The choice of the regression model was based on the significance of the regression coefficients and on the highest value of the determination coefficient; in both cases, the SISVAR (Ferreira, 2011) software was used.
The sunflower plants presented distinct results in response to the different doses of paclobutrazol in the following characteristics: size of the disk flowers, height of the plants and duration of the productive cycle (Table 1). However, the weight of the grains after the harvest did not present any differences due to the treatments. The biggest disc flowers were observed with 50 mL ha-1 dose of paclobutrazol, followed by the dose of 100 mL ha-1, while the higher doses gave similar or even lower results as compared to the control (Figure 1).
This occurred because gibberellins have an inhibitory effect on the flowering process (Pereira et al., 2014). As paclobutrazol inhibits the synthesis of this hormone in plants and interfer with the oxidation of ent-kaurene to kaurenoic acid in the pathway of gibberellins (Almeida and Pereira, 1996; Zheng et al., 2012), lower doses of this growth inhibitor might be beneficial to the flowering development of several crops.
However, higher doses have a negative effect on this parameter, as also observed by Wanderley et al. (2007), who noticed that high doses of paclobutrazol resulted in smaller disc flowers in sunflower under the hydroponic system.
The height of the plants at flowering showed a concentration dependence following paclobutrazol treat-ment (Figure 2). The control treatment had the highest average plant height (1.89 cm), while the treatments with paclobutrazol presented lower values.
Wanderley et al. (2014) noticed that in ornamental sunflower produced in a hydroponic system, the reduction of the height reached even 90%, while Koutoubras et al. (2014) reported a decrease of 11.1%. So it is important to highlight that different genotypes of sunflower might present variable responses to paclobutrazol. Lower plant growth resulting from the utilization of paclobutrazol was also reported in several other crops (Hua et al., 2014; Peng et al., 2014; Koutoubras and Damala, 2015). Gibberellin promotes stem growth, especially as a result of its effect on cell elongation (Zhang et al., 2011; Yang et al., 2012). By inhibiting gibberellins, paclobutrazol also reduces the plants’ height. This is a very desirable result for the sunflower crop as tall plants and heavy discs make plants very susceptible to lodging (Koutoubras et al., 2014; Silva et al., 2015). This way, shorter sunflower plants might be a strategy to reduce losses in the mechanized harvest.
Seeds treated with paclobutrazol need longer time to complete development, in some cases almost an additional week (Figure 3). Thus, the treatment without paclobutrazol was faster in reaching the physiological maturity. This might be related to a delay in the emergence of the shoots caused by the growth inhibitor. Melo et al. (2014) noticed that tomato seeds treated with
![](/app/webroot/files/images/AJAR/2016/August/25%20Aug/da%20coasta%20fig%202%203.png)
paclobutrazol had a reduced germination rate and seedling emergence; this is related to the antagonizing effect of gibberellin, which is an essential hormone to germination.
Another reason for the longer cycle is the delayed development of leaf primordia into expanded leaves. This result was reported by Almeida and Pereira (1996), while assessing foliar applications of paclobutrazol in sunflower crop. With a smaller quantity of expanded leaves, photosynthesis is less effective, indicating a longer time for the plant to complete its vegetative cycle.
A longer productive cycle can be a problem for Brazilian conditions. In this country, sunflower is usually produced in the same fields after another crop such as soybean in the same year. With a higher amount of days in the field, the plants are more exposed to aggressive diseases like white mold (Markell et al., 2015) and weather conditions like wind damage. The results show an undesirable effect of the growth inhibitor in this regard, implying that the use of paclobutrazol in seed treatment should be followed by rigorous phytosanitary strategies.
The seed yield did not show any statistical differences between the treatments (Table 1). The average yield was relatively low (1044.92 kg ha-1) when compared with the Brazilian average yield (FAO, 2015), but this is the consequence of an unexpected drought in the area during the experiment. The yield responses found in this study were similar to those found by Koutoubras et al. (2014), who reported that a single foliar application of paclobutrazol resulted in shorter plants, but without the detriment of any yield parameters, like seed weight or number of achenes per disk flower.
However, paclobutrazol also increases yield in other crops (Tekalign and Hammes, 2005; Hua et al., 2014; Gatan and Gonzalez, 2015). This indicates that paclobutrazol might be a valuable tool for sunflower production as a growth regulator, as it reduces plant height and does not negatively affect yield. However, as it causes a longer development cycle, further researches involving environmental factors (as diseases occurrence) are needed for a clearer conclusion on the potential of this tool.
The use of paclobutrazol in seed treatment might be an interesting tool to manage the development of the sunflower crop under propitious conditions for plant lodging, as it reduces height without affecting seed yield. More studies are necessary to evaluate if the longer time to complete the development cycle can be harmful to sunflower in the presence of abiotic or biotic stresses.
The authors have not declared any conflict of interests.
REFERENCES
Almeida JAS, Pereira MFDA (1996). Efeito de GA3 e paclobutrazol no desenvolvimento vegetativo do girassol. Braz. J. Plant. Physiol. 9(1):53-58.
|
|
COMPANHIA NACIONAL DE ABASTECIMENTO-CONAB (2015). Acompanhamento da Safra Brasileira de Grãos, Brasília: CONAB 2(12):136.
|
|
|
FAO (2015). Faostat – Statistic Database. Avaiable in <http://www.faostat.fao.org/faostat>. Accessed in February 15th, 2016.
|
|
|
Faria G, Guimarães RM, Carvalho ER, Souza DP (2015). Methods for the assessment of isoenzymes activity in sunflower seeds. J. Seed Sci. 7(3):211-217.
Crossref
|
|
|
Ferreira DF (2011). Sisvar: A computer statistical analysis system. Cienc. Agrotec. 35(6):1039-1042.
|
|
|
Gatan MGB, Gonzaléz VDM (2015) Effect of different levels of paclobutrazol on the yield of Asha and Farmer's Variety of Peanut. JPAIR Multidis. Res. 21:1.
|
|
|
Hua S, Zhang Y, Yu H, Lin B, Ding H, Zhang D, Ren Y, Fang, Z (2014). Paclobutrazol Application Effects on Plant Height, Seed Yield and Carbohydrate Metabolism in Canola. Int. J. Agric. Biol. 16(3):471-479.
|
|
|
Khan MSH, Wagatsuma T, Akhter A, Tawaraya K (2009). Sterol biosynthesis inhibition by paclobutrazol induces greater aluminum (Al) sensitivity in Al-tolerant rice. Am. J. Plant Physiol. 4:89-99.
Crossref
|
|
|
Kim J, Wilson RL, Case JB, Binder BM (2012). A comparative study of ethylene growth response kinetics in eudicots and monocots reveals a role for gibberellin in growth inhibition and recovery. Plant Physiol. 160:1567-1580.
Crossref
|
|
|
Koutoubras SD, Damalas CA (2015). Sunflower response to repeated foliar applications of paclobutrazol. Planta Daninha 33 (1):129-135.
Crossref
|
|
|
Koutoubras SD, Vassiliou G, Damalas CA (2014). Sunflower morphology and yield as affected by foliar applications of plant growth regulators. Int. J. Plant Prod. 8(2):215-229.
|
|
|
Lima DC, Dutra AL, Pontes FM, Bezerra FTC (2014). Storage of sunflower seeds. Revista Cienc. Agron. 45(2):361-369.
Crossref
|
|
|
Markell SG, Harveson RM, Block CC, Gulya, TJ (2015). Sunflower diseases. In: Martinéz-Force E, Dunford NT, Salas JJ. Sunflower: Chemistry, Production, Processing and Utilization. AOCS Press pp. 93-129.
Crossref
|
|
|
Matsumoto ML, Fernandes MG, Mota TA (2015). Análise da entomofauna e flutuação associada a quatro culturas com potencial para a produção de biodiesel. Arq. Inst. Biol. 82(1):1-9.
Crossref
|
|
|
Melo APC, Seleguini A, Veloso VRS (2014). Peliculização de sementes de tomate associada ao paclobutrazol. Bragantia 73(2):123-129.
Crossref
|
|
|
Peng D, Chen X, Yin Y, Lu K, Yang W, Tang Y, Wang Z (2014). Lodging resistance of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.): Lignin accumulation and its related enzymes activities due to the application of paclobutrazol or gibberellin acid. Field Crops Res. 157:1-7.
Crossref
|
|
|
Porto WS, Carvalho CGP, Pinto RJB, Oliveira MF, Oliveira ACB (2008). Evaluation of sunflower cultivars for central Brazil. Sci. Agric. 65(2):139-144.
Crossref
|
|
|
Rademacher W (2000). Growth retardants: effects on gibberellin biosynthesis and other metabolic pathways. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 51:501-531.
Crossref
|
|
|
Ribeiro AC, Guimarães PTG, Alvarez VH (1999). Recomendação para o uso de corretivos e fertilizantes em Minas Gerais: 5ª Aproximação. 1st ed. Viçosa: Comissão de Fertilidade do Solo do Estado de Minas Gerais 359 p.
|
|
|
Ribeiro BT, Ferreira Junior DC, SILVA CR (2013). 10-day probable rainfall for Uberlandia, Minas Gerais State, Brazil. Biosci. J. 29(3):536-542.
|
|
|
Silva PSL, Santos LEB, Oliveira VR, Souza RP, Fernandes PLO (2015). Sample size and sampling method for evaluation of characteristics of the sunflower. Rev. Cienc. Agron. 46(1):144-154.
Crossref
|
|
|
Spitzer T, Matsusinsky P, Klemová Z, Kazda J (2011). Management of sunflower stand height using growth regulators. Plant Soil Environ. 57:357-363.
|
|
|
Sposaro MM, Chimenti CA, Hall AJ (2008). Root lodging in sunflower. Variations in anchorage strength across genotypes, soil types, crop population densities and crop developmental stages. Field Crops Res. 156(2):179-186.
Crossref
|
|
|
Tekalign T, Hammes PS (2005). Growth and biomass production in potato grown in the hot tropics as influenced by paclobutrazol. Plant Growth Regul. 45:37-46.
Crossref
|
|
|
Ungaro MRG, Castro C, Farias JRB, Barni NA; Ramos N, Sentelhas PC (2009). Agrometeorologia dos cultivos: o fator meteorológico na produção agrícola. 1.ed. Brasília: INMET 530 p.
|
|
|
Wanderley CS, Faria RT, Rezende R (2014). Crescimento de girassol como flor em vaso em função de doses de paclobutrazol. Rev. Ceres 61(1):35-41.
Crossref
|
|
|
Wanderley CS, Rezende R, Andrade CAB (2007). Efeito de paclobutrazol como regulador de crescimento e produção de flores de girassol em cultivo hidropônico. Ciênc. Agrotec. 31(6):1672-1678.
Crossref
|
|
|
Yang DL, Yao J, Mei CS, Tong XH, Zeng LJ, LI Q, Xiao LT, Sun TP, Li J, Deng XW, Lee CM, Thomashow MF, Yang Y, He Z, He SY (2012). Plant hormone jasmonate prioritizes defense over growth by interfering with gibberellin signaling cascade. Proc. Natl. Acad. of Sci. USA 109(19):1192-1200.
Crossref
|
|
|
Zhang Y, Zhang B, Yan D, Dong W, Yang W, Li Q, Zengg L, Wang J, Wang L, Hicks LM, He Z (2011). Two Arabidopsis cytochrome P450 monooxygenases CYP714A1 and CYP714A2, function redundantly in plant development through gibberellin deactivation. Plant J. 7(2):342-353.
Crossref
|
|
|
Zheng R, Wu Y, Xia Y (2012). Chlorocholine chloride and paclobutrazol treatments promote carbohydrate accumulation in bulbs of Lilium Oriental hybrids 'Sorbone'. J. Zhejiang Univ. 13(2):136-144.
Crossref
|
|