African Journal of
Agricultural Research

  • Abbreviation: Afr. J. Agric. Res.
  • Language: English
  • ISSN: 1991-637X
  • DOI: 10.5897/AJAR
  • Start Year: 2006
  • Published Articles: 6861

Full Length Research Paper

Cadmium effects on sunflower growth and mineral nutrition

Miria Maria Almeida de Abreu Silva Ferreira
  • Miria Maria Almeida de Abreu Silva Ferreira
  • Centre of Agrarian, Environmental and Biological Sciences, Federal University of Recôncavo of Bahia, Cruz das Almas, 44380-000, BA, Brazil.
  • Search for this author on:
  • Google Scholar
Jorge Antonio Gonzaga Santos
  • Jorge Antonio Gonzaga Santos
  • Centre of Agrarian, Environmental and Biological Sciences, Federal University of Recôncavo of Bahia, Cruz das Almas, 44380-000, BA, Brazil.
  • Search for this author on:
  • Google Scholar
Silvany Cardim Moura
  • Silvany Cardim Moura
  • Centre of Agrarian, Environmental and Biological Sciences, Federal University of Recôncavo of Bahia, Cruz das Almas, 44380-000, BA, Brazil.
  • Search for this author on:
  • Google Scholar
Claudia Brito de Abreu
  • Claudia Brito de Abreu
  • Centre of Agrarian, Environmental and Biological Sciences, Federal University of Recôncavo of Bahia, Cruz das Almas, 44380-000, BA, Brazil.
  • Search for this author on:
  • Google Scholar
Marcela Reboucas Bomfim
  • Marcela Reboucas Bomfim
  • Centre of Agrarian, Environmental and Biological Sciences, Federal University of Recôncavo of Bahia, Cruz das Almas, 44380-000, BA, Brazil.
  • Search for this author on:
  • Google Scholar
Andre Dias de Azevedo Neto
  • Andre Dias de Azevedo Neto
  • Centre of Exacts and Technological Sciences, Federal University of Recôncavo of Bahia, Cruz das Almas, 44380-000, BA, Brazil.
  • Search for this author on:
  • Google Scholar


  •  Received: 08 May 2016
  •  Accepted: 25 August 2016
  •  Published: 15 September 2016

 ABSTRACT

A hydroponic greenhouse study was carried out to evaluate the effects of increasing cadmium (Cd) concentration on plant growth, mineral nutrition and Cd distribution of H-250 sunflower genotype. Exposure to increasing Cd concentrations reduced plant biomass by 40, 34, 47 and 42% of the total, leaves, stem and roots dry weights as compared to the control. Regardless of the treatment most of Cd uptake by the genotype was allocated in the root, followed by leaf and stem. The higher bioconcentration factors values in both above ground and underground plant tissues and low transfer factor value indicated that this genotype may be an alternative for use in phytostabilization programs. The results also showed that increasing Cd concentration disrupted plant homeostasis as it increased the concentration of some nutrients and had adverse effect on others, impacting plant growth. In this context, the results suggest that the low magnesium, iron and manganese concentrations in the leaves were the main cause for plant biomass reduction and leaf chlorosis and necrosis, as each one of these elements plays a key role on the chlorophyll molecule and on photosynthesis process.

 

Key words: Bioremediation, bioaccumulation factor, heavy metal stress, Helianthus annuus, transfer factor.


 INTRODUCTION

Cadmium (Cd) is a non-essential trace metal that presents potential threat for humans, plants, microorganisms and environment (Dong et al., 2007). It is considered to be one of the most toxic heavy metals in soil and water environments in the world (Järup and Åkesson,  2009).  Exposure of  humans  to  Cd  is  an important issue. Based on the combined considerations of frequency, toxicity and potential for human exposure, Cd is ranked as the fourth metal In the List of Hazardous Substances (ATSDR, 2014). Environmental Cd contamination is a serious concern due to its high solubility in water Cd and because it can easily enter in the food chain mainly by plant uptake and accumulated in plants and animals to concentrations that may pose carcinogenic, teratogenic, and mutagenic effects (Nazar et al., 2012). The Food and Agriculture Organization/World Health Organization (FAO/WHO, 1972) established a maximum weekly intake of 7 μg Cd per kg of body weight. Human activities, such as metallic industries, herbicides, concentrated phosphate fertilizers and industrial and municipal waste have contributed to the increase of Cd concentrations in the environment (Benavides et al., 2005). 
 
 
 
 
To cope with metal toxicity or to maintain the level of essential metal within physiological ranges, plants have evolved complex cellular mechanisms of accumulation or exclusion to regulate uptake of nonessential metals. The main characteristic of the plants that accumulate metals is to translocate most of them to the aboveground tissue. These plants present bioconcentration factor - BCF (the ratio of metal concentration in shoot to soil), and transfer factor - TF (the ratio of metal concentration in shoot to root) greater than one. In contrast, excluders plants limit soil-root and root-shoot transfers, and therefore BCF and TF are lower than one (Malik et al., 2010; Yoon et al., 2006).
 
Exposure of non-accumulator plant species to Cd can inhibit plant growth and can cause plant stunting, chlorosis, apical meristem necrosis, brownish colour and plant death (Smeets et al., 2005). The metal toxicity may also alter many plant physiological processes including the nitrogen and carbohydrates metabolism, photosynthesis, mineral nutrients assimilation, and the plant water relationship (Gajdos et al., 2012). Cadmium induced plant tissue toxicity may be accompanied with reduced uptake of essential plant mineral nutrients. Increasing Cd concentration, in the external solution, may reduce the plant uptake of Ca2+, Fe2+, Zn2+, and Mn2+ due to competition for the same membrane transporters. Some of these nutrients are also enzyme cofactors, involved in plant defense against oxidative stress, increasing the rate of biochemical reactions and physiological processes in plants (Nazar et al., 2012; Sarwar et al., 2010).
 
Sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.), a fast growing crop (Gajdos et al., 2012), is the fourth largest oil producer after soybean, canola and cotton (USDA-FAS, 2015) and presents a great economical potential for biodiesel production. The genotype diversity of sunflower confers to the specie a great plasticity in response to various growth environmental conditions (Capone et al., 2012) including the environmental stress. Sunflower has been cultivated as food and feed crop as well as for bioenergy production. The ability of the specie to remove organic and metal pollutants has also been evaluated in phytoremediation studies (Lopes Júnior et al., 2014; Zou et al., 2008). Selection of Cd-tolerant and Cd-accumulator sunflower genotypes can be achieved evaluating the Cd concentration in their organs. The pattern of metal uptake and distribution of the specie vary with the level of contamination (Simon et al., 1998) and cultivars (Ansari et al., 2009; Zou et al., 2008). It is hypothesized that sunflower can be cropped up to a maximum Cd available concentration. The present study was undertaken, aiming better understanding in the growth, metal accumulation and partitioning, and mineral nutrition of H-250 sunflower genotype exposure to increasing Cd concentration. This information is relevant to indicate the maximum Cd concentration for this genotype cultivation.
 


 MATERIALS AND METHODS

Experiment setup
 
Seeds from H-250 sunflower genotype were sown in 200 mL plastic cups containing washed sand and irrigated daily with distilled water. Five-day-old seedlings selected for uniformity in size and form were acclimatized in pots containing half-strength Hoagland and Arnon (1950) nutrient solution at pH 6.0 ± 0.5. Seven days later, they were transferred to containers containing 10 L of this same nutrient solution containing five different cadmium doses (0; 2.5; 5.0; 7.5 or 10.0 μM), from here on referred to as Cd0, Cd2.5, Cd5.0, Cd7.5 and Cd10, applied as Cd(NO3)2.4H2O. Preliminary studies using various Cd concentrations (from 0 to 50 μM) have shown that concentrations of up to 10 μM are sublethal, but induce significant effects on short-term exposure. The nutrient solutions were aerated for 15 minutes every three hours by an air compressor, model GF180 (Resun Group CO, Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN). The volume of nutrient solutions was completed daily with distilled water. The mean values of temperature, air relative humidity and photosynthetic active radiation (at noon) in greenhouse were 27°C, 65% and 1200 µmol m-2 s-1, respectively. The plants were harvested seven days after transplanting.
 
 
Growth measurements
 
The harvested plants were washed thoroughly with tap water, and then rinsed with deionized water. Sunflower plants were separated in leaf, stem and root and their fresh weight determined. Plant material was oven dried at 65°C for 72h and them the leaf dry weight (LDW), stem dry weight (SDW), root dry weight (RDW), and total dry weight (TDW) were determined. Leaf succulence (LSUC) was calculated according to Mantovani (1999) as LSUC = (LFW – LDW) / LA, where LFW is the leaf fresh weight (g), LDW the leaf dry weight (g plant-1), and LA the leaf area (cm2 plant-1). Leaf area was measured using a WinDIAS image system, model W-C110-PC (Delta-T Devices Ltd, Cambridge, Cambs., UK). The dried plant material was ground to 20-mesh fineness using a Wiley mill, model STAR FT-50 (Fortinox, Piracicaba, SP, BR)
 
Cadmium and nutrient analysis
 
The plant parts were digested with 3.5 mL H2SO4 (96-98% w/w) and 2.0 mL 30% H2O2, as described by Jones (2001) for the analysis of the elements. The digested material was adjusted to 100 mL volume with deionized water. The total concentration of Cd, K, Ca, Mg, Mn, Fe, Zn and Cu in the solution were analyzed by Optical Inductively Coupled Plasma Spectrometry, model Optima 3300XL (Perkin Elmer, Norwalk, MA, USA). The determinations of N and P were performed by spectrophotometry by the methods of phenol-hypochlorite and molibdo-vanadate, respectively, as described by Faithfull (2002). The accuracy was confirmed using the standard reference material NIST-SRM-1572 (Gaithersburg, MD, USA). Cadmium bioconcentration factors of aboveground (BCF) and underground (BCFR) plant tissues, and transfer factor (TF) were calculated using the following equations (ŽaltauskaitÄ— and ŠliumpaitÄ—, 2013):
 
 
 
BCF = Cdshoot / Cdsolution
BCFR = Cdroot / Cdsolution
TF = Cdshoot / Cdroot
 
Where Cdshoot and Cdroot are the cadmium concentrations in aboveground and underground tissues, respectively, and Cdsolution is the cadmium concentration in nutrient solution.
 
Statistical analysis
 
The treatments were arranged as a completely randomized design with five doses of cadmium and four replications. All data are expressed as the mean of all replicates. Treatment effects were determined by analysis of variance according to the general linear model procedure of the Statistical Analysis System (SAS, 2003) at p < 0.05. Regression equations were then adjusted to the significant data.
 


 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Exposure to nonessential elements, such as Cd, impacts plant homeostasis with reflex on plant growth, element partitioning, nutrient uptake, water relations (Hossain et al., 2010), enzyme activity (Ouariti et al., 1997; Van Assche and Clijsters, 1990), photosynthesis and respiration metabolisms (Mobin and Khan, 2007; Shi et al., 2010; Vassilev and Yordanov 1997), nutritional deficiencies and imbalances (Clemens, 2006; di Toppi and Gabbrielli, 1999).
 
Effect of Cd on sunflower development
 
After one week, youngest leaves of sunflower growing in all Cd spiked solutions showed symptoms of toxicity, as indicated by chlorosis (Figure 1). Cadmium concentration in the solution had a major impact on plant growth indicators. Exposure to increasing Cd concentrations linearly reduced the sunflower LDW (Figure 2A). For instance, exposure of 10.0 µM of Cd resulted in the reduction of LDW by ~0.73 g, which is equivalent to 0.057 g DW per µM Cd in solution. This effect was also observed on the SDW (Cd0 1.06 to Cd10 0.56 g DW, a reduction of 0.045g DW µM-1 Cd-solution, Figure 2B); on RDW (Cd0 1.22 to Cd10 0.70 g DW or a reduction of 0.044 g DW µM-1 Cd, Figure 2C) and, consequently, on TDW (Cd0 4.42 to Cd10 2.93 g DW or a reduction of 0.145 g DW µM -1 Cd, Figure 2D). The LDW accounted for about 50% of the TDW. At the highest Cd-concentration (10 µM), the plant biomass reduction was higher in the stem (47%) and roots (42%) and lower in the leaves (34%) as compared to the control. Increasing Cd concentration did not alter the shoot to root ratio of the treatments.
 
 
Cadmium increasing concentration also reduced sunflower LA (13.13 cm2 µM-1 Cd, Figure 2E). Cadmium stress did not alter the water status of the leaves as indicated by the leaf succulence (LSUC) that show no variation with increasing doses of cadmium in nutrient solution (Figure 2F). The leaf water concentration averaged 31.05 g H2O cm-2 LA.
 
Cadmium promotes disturbances in vital physiological plant processes. Our data suggest that the photosynthetic activity restriction caused by chlorosis, necrosis and LA reduction may explain, at least in part, the Cd-induced plant growth reduction.
 
Cadmium concentration and partition in the plant
 
Cadmium concentration in the plant parts changed with Cd-solution (Figure 3). In leaf, ranged from 0.01 μmol g-1 DW at Cd0 to 0.71 μmol g-1 DW at Cd10; in stem varied from 0.03 μmol g-1 DW at Cd0 to 0.71 μmol g-1 DW at Cd10; and in root ranged from 0.03 μmol g-1 DW at  Cd0  to 2.85 μmol g-1 DW at Cd10 (Figure 3A). To all plant parts it was observed a linear increase of Cd concentration with Cd solution (Figure 3A). Sunflower concentrated more Cd in the roots than in other plant parts in the Cd treatments. The highest difference in Cd root as compared to the other part of the plant occurred at Cd2.5. For instance, at Cd2.5 71.0, 22.5 and 6.5% of the Cd were allocated in the roots, leaves and stem, respectively, as compared with 58.7, 29.7 and 11.6%, respectively in Cd10 (Figure 3B). The result of Cd partitioning in sunflower organs in this study was similar to others reported elsewhere (Lopes Júnior et al., 2014; Zou et al., 2008).
 
 
 
The higher concentration of Cd in the root was due to the immobilization of the metal in the roots caused by its limited translocation from the roots to the shoot. The higher Cd retention in sunflower root as compared to the other plant parts is attributed to a complex system, which involve the element adsorption, chelation, and compartmentalization, which in turns limits Cd translocation from roots to the shoot (Nocito et al., 2011). Cadmium passes from the external solution to the interior of the plant through the apoplastic transport where it accumulates (Lux et al., 2011). The apoplast is a dense region of negative charge due to the presence of carboxylic groups, which are critical to the retention of cations such as Cd2+ (Redjala et al., 2009). The roots act as a barrier for immobilization of toxic ions, preventing their translocation to the shoot (Azad et al., 2011). The stem retention is also considered as a tolerance mechanism, by preventing that toxic elements disrupt cell metabolism in the leaves (Higuchi et al., 2013). The results of Cd partition in the plants parts show that the stem retention was not an effective mechanism for regulating the Cd transport from roots to the leaves. The ability of the H-250 sunflower genotype to concentrate Cd in the shoot tissues relative to Cd-solution (BCF) was constant around 74.5, over the range of the Cd concentration tested (Figure 4A). The most of Cd in the plant was located in the root, therefore BCFR values ranged from 538 at Cd2.5 to 281 at Cd10 (Figure 4A). The TF of the genotype were lower than one and ranged from 0.137 at Cd2.5 to 0.247 in the plants growing at Cd10 (Figure 4B).
 
 
The ratio of metal concentration in the roots to growing media, bioaccumulation factor (BCF) has been used to estimate the ability of the plant concentrate the metal from the solution. On the other hand, the ratio of metal concentration in the shoots to the roots (TF) has been used to estimate metal translocation from the roots to the shoots. BCF and TF greater than one indicate that the metal is concentrated in the shoot relative to the growing media or that the metal is  accumulating  preferentially  in  shoot relative to the root. The BCF and BCFR values found in this study were high, in contrast to the TF values which were low, suggesting that the sunflower plants can be used for the phytostabilization purpose. The limitation of Cd transfer from the root to the shoot may be seen as a defense mechanism used by plants to minimize the deleterious effects of excessive nonessential metals in the shoot and according to Hossain et al. (2010) it is considered a tolerance mechanism. While non-tolerant species and tolerant excluders tend to accumulate nonessential metals, as Cd in roots, accumulator plants evolved a more efficient mechanism to translocate metals from root to shoot.
 
Sunflower nutrient status
 
Cadmium toxicity alters plant macro and micronutrients uptake (Ciećko et al., 2004; Sarwar et al., 2010). The macronutrients N, P, K, Ca and Mg concentrations in sunflower leaf and root are shown in Figure 5. Increasing Cd concentration had a positive quadratic effect on leaf N (Figure 5A), P (Figure 5B) and K (Figure 5C). The estimated maximum sunflower leaf N (4.381 mmol g-1 DM), P (0.325 mmol g-1 DM) and K (1.577 mmol g-1 DM) concentrations occurred at Cd5.9, Cd9.3 and Cd7.8, respectively. Thus, the estimated N, P and K concentrations were 10, 53 and 57% higher than the control, respectively. The concentration of N in the stem was not evaluated. Cadmium in solution also had positive linear effect on P stem and K root. The concentration of Cd-solution has no effect in the N and P concentrations in the root, and in K concentration in the stem.
 
The increase of N in the leaves is a clear indicative that the symptom of chlorosis presented by the plant was not determined by the deficiency of this nutrient. There are reports in the literature that N uptake decreases with the Cd concentration in nutrient solution (Guimarães et al., 2008; López-Millán et al., 2009). However the synergisms and antagonisms existent between the uptake of N and Cd by the plants seem to be related to nitrogen source (Ciećko et al., 2004). Studies have shown the existence of antagonistic interactions between N-NH4+ and Cd2+ uptake and synergistic interactions between N-NO3- and Cd (Sarwar et al., 2010). As in this study the N-NO-3:N-NH4+ ratio in nutrient solution is 14:1, and N-NO3- is responsible for at least 50% of total anions absorbed by plants (Marschner, 2012), the higher N-NO3- plant uptake may have been used for balancing the electrical charge of the plant, thereby interfering with the regulation and absorption of other nutrients.
 
Although the Cd concentration did not impact the P concentration in the root, the P concentration in the sunflower leaves increased up to 53% as compared to the control as cadmium concentration in the nutrient solution increased. Similar result was found in a study with cedar plants (Paiva et al., 2001). Plants may maintain a higher P concentration in the leaves as a way of reduce the free Cd and promoting the Cd-phosphate precipitate formation (Sarwar et al., 2010), which is sequestered in the vacuole and immobilized in the cell wall (Belleghem et al., 2006). 
 
 

Potassium plays a central role in the water relations (Meurer, 2006), therefore the increase in leaf and root K concentrations is consistent with the need of the plant to keep the turgor, mainly in higher Cd concentrations. The increasing K concentration in sunflower roots may have helped the maintenance of water absorption by the roots and its flux to the shoot. Additionally, the increasing K concentration in the leaves may have favored the stomata opening at higher Cd concentrations, thereby maintaining the plant gas exchange during stress. The increase in K concentration in sunflower leaves obtained in this study differed from those obtained for sunflower, (Simon, 1998), cedar (Paiva et al., 2001) and maize roots, (Ciećko et al., 2004). However, the Cd concentration in the solution, the time of the exposure to Cd, and the plant age of these studies were higher than that tested in our study.

The concentration of Cd-solution has no effect in the Ca concentration in the root, stem and leaf (Figure 5D). In contrast, increasing Cd concentration has negative quadratic effect in plant Mg (Figure 5E). The estimated minimum concentration in leaf (0.231 mmol g-1 DM), stem (0.038 mmol g-1 DM) and root (0.036 mmol g-1 DM) occurred, respectively, at Cd5.0, Cd3.3 and Cd9.5.Iron, Mn, Zn, and Cu concentrations in sunflower leaves and roots are shown in Figure 6. Cadmium concentrations had positive effect on sunflower root Fe and Cu and leaf Zn but negative effect on leaf and stem Fe, leaf and root Mn, and stem and root Zn (Figure 6). The estimated minimum leaf Fe concentration (0.86 μM g-1 DW) was at Cd7.65 μM Cd, representing a reduction of 87% when compared with Fe concentration of the control (6.75 μM g-1 DW) (Figure 6A). Leaf Mn concentration decreased linearly (0.375 μM g-1 DW) with Cd solution (Figure 6B). Leaf Fe and Mn concentrations were present in concentration reverse to that of Cd. Sunflower leaf Zn concentration increased with Cd-solution (Figure 6C). The estimated maximum leaf Zn concentration 1.12 μM g-1 DW occurred at Cd7.4. Leaf Cu concentration had no change (0.929 μM g-1 DW) with Cd-solution (Figure 6D). The concentrations of Mn and Cu in the stem were below the level of detection. Sunflower root concentration of Fe and Cu increased in 0.325 and 0.075 μmol g-1 DW, respectively for each unit of Cd-solution (Figures 6A and 6D). At Cd10 the root Cu concentration, 1.57 μmol g-1 DW, was twice the value of the control plants 0.819 μmol g-1 DW. In contrast, the root concentration of Mn and Zn decreased quadratically with Cd-solution (Figures 6B and 6C). The minimum Mn 18.10 μM g-1 DW and Zn 0.90 μM g-1 DW concentrations were observed at Cd6.7 and Cd7.3, respectively.

 

 

The cadmium toxicity symptoms (chlorosis and necrosis) as presented especially in younger leaves of H-250   sunflower   genotype   exposed   to   increasing   Cd concentrations have been reported elsewhere (Chaves et al., 2011; Zou et al., 2008). The increase of Cd in the nutrient solution may have an antagonist effect on the concentration of several elements since the Cd seems to enter in the plants, mainly via Ca2+ or Mg2+ channels or via other divalent transporters such as Fe2+, Mn2+, and Zn2+ (Clemens, 2006; Sarwar et al., 2010). In the present study, the chlorosis and necrosis symptoms were attributed to a combined adverse effect of Cd on leaf Mg, Fe and Mn concentrations.
 
The decrease of Fe concentration in the leaf in conjunction with the increase in the root also suggests the occurrence of Cd-induced disturbances in the Fe translocation from shoot to the root. Iron is frequently referred as the most affected nutrient by Cd exposure. According to Pál et al. (2006), leaf chlorosis and plant growth inhibition are the most noticeable symptoms caused by Cd stress. Considering that Fe plays a key role in the chlorophyll biosynthesis (Benavides et al., 2005), our results suggest that the decrease in the Fe concentration was a determining factor for plant chlorosis and biomass reduction.Our results also show a decrease of Mn concentrations in both leaves and roots. Manganese is a key element in restoring the chlorophyll molecule structure (Sarwar et al., 2010). In addition, Mn plays key role in the activity of enzymes that mediate the catalysis of the water-splitting reaction to produce oxygen and to provide electrons for the photosynthetic electron transport chain (Goussias et al., 2002; Nickelsen and Rengstl, 2013), and its deficiency directly affects the photosynthetic rate. Therefore, it is likely that the reduction of Mn concentrations observed in this study may be an additional factor inducing chlorosis symptoms and reducing plant growth.
 
Cadmium and Zn tend to compete for accumulation in plant shoots (Nocito et al., 2011). Zinc is an important nutrient in maintaining the biomembranes. Zinc also plays a crucial role as a functional and/or structural component of a number of enzymes, besides being essential for activity, regulation, and stabilization of protein structure (Mason, 2013). In this study, Cd induced a slight reduction in Zn concentration in the roots, but increased Zn concentration in the leaves, suggesting that the Cd-induced growth reduction did not seems to be related to changes in concentrations of this nutrient in the plant.
 
Cadmium stress induced an increase of 100% in root Cu concentration but did not affect the concentration of this element in the leaves. The increased root Cu concentration in Cd-stressed plants has also been reported in other studies (López-Millán et al., 2009; Obata and Umebayashi, 1997; Sandalio et al., 2001). The increase in root concentrations of Cu and Fe transition metals observed in this study may lead to increased hydroxyl free radical production through the Fenton reaction (Silva et al., 2013). Therefore, it could be hypothesized that Cd-induced oxidative stress was more pronounced   in   the   roots   than   in   the   leaves.   The  observation that RDW was more affected than LDW by Cd-stress is an additional support to this hypothesis.

 


 CONCLUSIONS

Our results show that H-250 is a Cd-excluder sunflower genotype, since it preferentially concentrates the metal in the roots. Thus, this genotype may be an alternative for use in phytostabilization programs. The results also showed that the increasing Cd concentration disrupted the plant nutrient homeostasis as it increased the concentration of some nutrients and had adverse effect on others, impacting plant growth. In this scenario, the results indicate that the low Mg, Fe and Mn concentrations in the leaves were the main cause for plant growth reduction and leaf chlorosis and necrosis, as each one of these elements plays a key role on the chlorophyll molecule and on photosynthetic process.


 CONFLICT OF INTERESTS

The authors have not declared any conflict of interests.


 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (Capes), the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq), and Universidade Federal do Recôncavo da Bahia (UFRB) for financial support over the years.



 REFERENCES

Ansari R, Kazi TG, Jamali MK, Arain MB, Wagan MD, Jalbani N, Afridi HI, Shah AQ (2009) Variation in accumulation of heavy metals in different verities of sunflower seed oil with the aid of multivariate technique. Food Chem. 115(1):318-323.
Crossref
 

ATSDR - Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (2014). Priority List of Hazardous Substances. Available at: http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/SPL/index.html. Accessed 16 May 2015.

  
 

Azad HN, Shiva AH, Malekpour R (2011). Toxic effects of lead on growth and some biochemical and ionic parameters of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) seedlings. Curr. Res. J. Biol. Sci. 3(4):398-403.

  
 

Belleghem FV, Cuypers A, Semane B, Smeets K, Vangronsveld J, d'Haen J, Valcke R. (2006). Subcellular localization of cadmium in roots and leaves of Arabidopsis thaliana. New Phytol. 173(3):495-508.
Crossref

  
 

Benavides MP, Gallego SM, Tomaro ML (2005). Cadmium toxicity in plants. Braz. J. Plant Physiol. 17(1):21-34.
Crossref

  
 

Capone A, Santos ER, Ferraz EC, Santos AF, Oliveira JL, Barros HB (2012). Desempenho agronômico de cultivares de girassol no sul do Estado de Tocantins. J. Biotec. Biodivers. 3(3):13-23.

  
 

Chaves LHG, Estrela MA, Souza RS (2011). Effect on plant growth and heavy metal accumulation by sunflower. J. Phytol. 3(12):4-9.

  
 

Ciećko Z, Kalembasa S, Wyszkowski M, Rolka E (2004). Effects of soil contamination by cadmium on potassium uptake by plants. Polish J. Environ. Stud. 13(3):333-337.

  
 

Clemens S (2006). Toxic metal accumulation, responses to exposure and mechanisms of tolerance in plants. Biochim. 88(11):1707-1719.
Crossref

  
 

Di Toppi LS, Gabbrielli R (1999). Response to cadmium in higher plants. Environ. Exp. Bot. 41:105-130.
Crossref

  
 

Dong J, Mao WH, Zhang GP, Wu FB, Cail Y (2007). Root excretion and plant tolerance to cadmium toxicity – a review. Plant Soil Environ. 53(5):193-200.

  
 

Faithfull NT (2002). Methods in agricultural chemical analysis: A practical handbook. CABI Publishing, Wallingford.
Crossref

  
 

FAO/WHO (1972). Evaluation of certain food additives and the contaminants mercury, lead, and cadmium. Sixteenth Report. FAO Nutrition Meetings Report Series No.51. WHO Technical Report Series No. 505. World Health Organization, Geneva.

  
 

Gajdos E, Lévai L, Veres S, Kovács B (2012). Effects of biofertilizers on maize and sunflower seedlings under cadmium stress. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 43(1-2):272-279.
Crossref

  
 

Goussias C, Boussac A, Rutherford W (2002). Photosystem II and photosynthetic oxidation of water: an overview. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 357(1426):1369-1381.
Crossref

  
 

Guimarães MA, Santana TA, Silva EV, Zenzen IL, Loureiro EM (2008). Toxicidade e tolerância ao cádmio em plantas. Rev. Tróp. 1(3):58-68.

  
 

Higuchi K, Tsuchiya M, Nakata S, Tanabe A, Fukawa S, Kanai M, Miwa E (2013). Detoxification of cadmium (Cd) by a novel Cd-associated and Cd-induced molecule in the stem of common reed. J. Plant Physiol. 170(18):1553-1560.
Crossref

  
 

Hoagland DR, Arnon DI (1950). The water-cultured method for growing plants without soil. Calif. Agr. Expt. Sta. Circ. 347(1):1-32.

  
 

Hossain MA, Hasanuzzaman M, Fujita M (2010). Up-regulation of antioxidant and glyoxalase systems by exogenous glycinebetaine and proline in mung bean confer tolerance to cadmium stress. Physiol. Mol. Biol. Plant 16(3):259-272.
Crossref

  
 

Järup L, Åkesson A (2009). Current status of cadmium as an environmental health problem. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 238:201-208.
Crossref

  
 

Jones JB (2001). Laboratory guide for conducting soil tests and plant analysis. CRC Press, Boca Raton 363 p.

  
 

Lopes Júnior CA, Mazzafera, P, Arruda, MAZ (2014). A comparative ionomic approach focusing on cadmium effects in sunflowers (Helianthus annuus L.). Environ. Exp. Bot. 107(11):180-186.
Crossref

  
 

López-Millán A, Sagardoy R, Solanas M, Abadía A, Abadía J (2009). Cadmium toxicity in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) plants grown in hydroponics. Environ. Exp. Bot. 65(2-3):376-385.
Crossref

  
 

Lux A, Martinka M, Vaculík M, White PJ (2011). Root responses to cadmium in the rhizosphere: a review. J. Exp. Bot. 62(1):21-37.
Crossref

  
 

Malik RN, Husain SZ, Nazir I (2010). Heavy metal contamination and accumulation in soil and wild plant species from industrial area of Islamabad, Pakistan. Pak. J. Bot. 42(1):291-301.

  
 

Mantovani A (1999). A method to improve leaf succulence quantification. Braz. Arch. Biol. Technol. 42:9-14.
Crossref

  
 

Marschner P (2012). Marschner's Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants. Academic Press, London 651p.

  
 

Mason RP (2013). Trace metals in aquatic systems. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester 440 p.
Crossref

  
 

Meurer EJ (2006). Potássio. In: Fernandes MS (Ed.) Nutrição mineral de plantas. Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência do Solo, Viçosa pp. 282-298.

  
 

Mobin M, Khan NA (2007). Photosynthetic activity, pigment composition and antioxidative response of two mustard (Brassica juncea) cultivars differing in photosynthetic capacity subjected to cadmium stress. J. Plant. Physiol. 164(5):601-610.
Crossref

  
 

Nazar R, Iqbal N, Masood A, Khan MIR, Syeed S, Khan NA (2012). Cadmium toxicity in plants and role of mineral nutrients in its alleviation. Am. J. Plant Sci. 3(10):1476-1489.
Crossref

  
 

Nickelsen J, Rengstl B (2013). Assembly of photosystem II: from cyanobacteria to plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 64:609-635.
Crossref

  
 

Nocito FF, Lancilli C, Dendena B, Lucchini B, Sacchi G (2011). Cadmium retention in rice roots is influenced by cadmium availability chelation and translocation. Plant Cell Environ. 34(6):994-1008.
Crossref

  
 

Obata H, Umebayashi M (1997). Effects of cadmium on mineral nutrient concentrations in plants differing tolerance for cadmium. J. Plant Nutr. 20(1):97-105.
Crossref

  
 

Ouariti O, Boussama N, Zarrouk M, Cherif A, Ghorbal MH (1997). Cadmium- and copper-induced changes in tomato membrane lipids. Phytochemical 45(7):1343-1350.
Crossref

  
 

Paiva HN, Carvalho JG, Siqueira JO (2001). Effect of the cadmium application on nutrients content in cedro (Cedrela fissilis VELL.) seedlings. Cienc. Florest. 11(2):153-162.

  
 

Pál M, Horváth E, Janda T, Páldi E, Szalai G (2006). Physiological changes and defense mechanisms induced by cadmium stres in maize. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 169(2):239-246.
Crossref

  
 

Redjala T, Sterckeman T, Morel JL (2009). Cadmium uptake by roots: Contribution of apoplast and of high- and low-affinity membrane transport systems. Environ. Exp. Bot. 67(1):235-242.
Crossref

  
 

Sandalio LM, Dalurzo HC, Gómez M, Romero-Puertas MC, Del Río LA (2001). Cadmium-induced changes in the growth and oxidative metabolism of pea plants. J. Exp. Bot. 52(364):2115-2126.

  
 

Sarwar N, Saifullah, Malhi SS, Zia MH, Naeen A, Bibi S, Farid G (2010). Role of mineral nutrition in minimizing cadmium accumulation by plants (Review). J. Sci. Food Agric. 90(6):925-937.
Crossref

  
 

SAS - Statistical Analysis System (2003). Release 9.1 (software). SAS Institute Inc., Cary.

  
 

Shi G, Liu C, Cai Q, Liu Q, Hou C (2010). Cadmium accumulation and tolerance of two sunflower cultivars in relation to photosynthesis and antioxidative enzymes. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 85:256-263.
Crossref

  
 

Silva EC, Albuquerque MB, Azevedo Neto AD, Silva Junior CD (2013). Drought and its consequences to plants from individual to ecosystem. In: Akinci Åž (Ed.) Responses of Organisms to Water Stress. InTech, Rijeka pp. 17-47.
Crossref

  
 

Simon L (1998). Cadmium accumulation and distribution in sunflower plant. J. Plant Nutrit. 21(2):341-352.
Crossref

  
 

Smeets K, Cuypers A, Lambrechts A, Semane B, Hoet P, Laerve AV, Vangronsveld J (2005). Induction of oxidative stress and antioxidative mechanisms in Phaseolus vulgaris after Cd application. J. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 43:437-444.
Crossref

  
 

USDA-FAS (2015). Oilseeds: World Markets and Trade. 

  
 

Van Assche F, Clijsters H (1990). Effects of metals on enzyme activity in plants. Plant Cell Environ. 13:195-206.
Crossref

  
 

Vassilev A, Yordanov I (1997). Reductive analysis of factors limiting growth of cadmium-treated plants: A Review. Bulg. J. Plant Physiol. 23(3-4):114-133.

  
 

Yoon J, Cao X, Zhou Q, Ma LQ (2006). Accumulation of Pb, Cu, and Zn in native plants growing on a contaminated Florida site. Sci. Total Environ. 368:456-464.
Crossref

  
 

ŽaltauskaitÄ— J, ŠliumpaitÄ— I (2013). Evaluation of Toxic Effects and Bioaccumulation of Cadmium and Copper in Spring Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Environ. Res. Eng. Manag. 64(2):51-58.
Crossref

  
 

Zou J, Xu P, Lu X, Jiang W, Liu, D (2008). Accumulation of cadmium in three sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) cultivars. Pak. J. Bot. 40(2):759-765.

  

 




Copyright © 2024 Author(s) retain the copyright of this article.

This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0

Back to Vol. 11 No. 37
Back to articles
SUBSCRIBE TO RSS
SUBMIT MANUSCRIPT
CONFERENCES
          */?>