African Journal of
Agricultural Research

  • Abbreviation: Afr. J. Agric. Res.
  • Language: English
  • ISSN: 1991-637X
  • DOI: 10.5897/AJAR
  • Start Year: 2006
  • Published Articles: 6865

Full Length Research Paper

Effects of different tillage systems and plant densities in corn silage yield

Masoud Mohseni*
  • Masoud Mohseni*
  • Agronomy and Horticulture Crops Research Department, Mazandran Agricultural and Natural Resources Research Center, AREEO, Sari, Iran.
  • Google Scholar
Mohammad Hossein Haddadi
  • Mohammad Hossein Haddadi
  • Agronomy and Horticulture Crops Research Department, Mazandran Agricultural and Natural Resources Research Center, AREEO, Sari, Iran.
  • Google Scholar


  •  Received: 23 July 2016
  •  Accepted: 31 October 2016
  •  Published: 17 November 2016

 ABSTRACT

In order to investigate tillage systems and plant densities effects on corn (Zea mays L.cv.sc704) silage yield and component after harvesting wheat, an experiment was carried out in randomized complete block design in a strip plot. Treatments were arranged with four replications in Agricultural and Natural Resources Research Center Station of Dashte-Naz in Mazandran, Iran, for two years in 2012 and 2013. Tillage systems had three levels: 1. Plow and Disk system (PDS). 2. Disk system (DS). 3. No tillage (NT). Other factor was plant density in four levels (70000, 80000, 90000 and 100000 plant/ha). The results indicated that most silage yield (55.62 ton ha-1) was obtained from Plow and Disk system (PDS) in density of 70000 plants/ha, that had no significant difference effects in comparison with No tillage system (NT) in density of 90000 plants ha-1 with silage yield of 53.39 ton ha-1. The results also indicated that most dry forage yield (18.09 tons ha-1) was obtained from Disk system (PDS) in density of 70000 plants ha-1 that had no significant difference effects in comparison to No tillage system (NT) in density of 90000 plants ha-1 with silage yield of 17.99 ton ha-1. According to results, best treatment was No tillage system (NT) in density of 90000 plants ha-1.

Key words: Corn, plant density, silage yeild, tillage system.


 INTRODUCTION

Conservation tillage systems can be an important part of a sustainable agricultural system, in that they can be used to decrease soil erosion losses ordinarily associated with typical conventional agricultural practices. It is important to remember that anything that is done to decrease erosion losses also decreases need to add as much fertilizer and water soils, given that top soil generally contains most organic matter. Conservation tillage also, ideally, decreases water pollution (via decreasing soil erosion), saves fossil fuel energy and thus decreases CO2 emissions, compared to conventional tillage systems. Because soil organic matter tends to increase  under   conservation   tillage,   as  compared  to conventional plowing, soils are also more effective to carbon storing.

Conservation tillage systems include a variety of techniques, including "no-till" "minimum till" "ridge till" "chisel plow" and "mulch till". The Soil Conservation Service (now called the Natural Resources Service) refers to these systems as "residue management". Conservation tillage is basically, any system of cultivation that reduces soil or water loss when compared to conventional moldboard plowing, which turns over the soil completely. Most definitions specify that at least 30% of the crop residue must remain on the soil surface at the time of planting. It was designed to conserve soil, water,  energy, and protect water quality (Mitchel et al., 2015). Soil compaction can cause unfavorable soil physical, chemical and microorganism conditions in subsoil, which hinder root growth and crop yield (Mosaddeghi et al., 2009).

According to survey results from Conservation Technology Information Center (CTIC) (Sare, 2014), most operations in Midwest that use a cover cropping system do so in tandem with no-till practices or organic production, to help mitigate potential negative effects with these particular systems in comparison with traditional tillage or non-organic methods, respectively. Soil tillage also modifies mineralization rates of nutrients, which feeds back on soil carbon input (Barré et al., 2010). No-till is a growing practice for soil conservation (Horowitz et al., 2010).

Soil compaction had negative effect on soybean production (Acuña and Villamil, 2014). Penetration of plant roots through compacted soils is difficult (Chen and Weil, 2010). Corn (Zea mays L.) silage production is very important in winter in north of Iran that producer need to forage, but deceasing temperature and solar energy in delay sowing date resulting in low silage yield because farmers used from common plant density, row spacing and plant pattern.

Corn (Z. mays L.) is the most important grain-forage crop in Iran. The average grain yield of corn is more than 8 t/ha and it increase annually. In order to optimize moisture use, nutrients and solar radiation and corn seeds must be plant under optimum density and tillage system. Intensive production of field crops practiced until recently to achieve high yields required intensive tillage and application of other high-technology inputs. This concept, however, implies a number of problems, among which relationship between product quality and quantity are in the foreground, along with increase crop production, which shows an important ecological sustainability. Above all, farmers approach production in terms of cost effectiveness of applied system (Kisic et al., 2010).

Use of agricultural mechanization was considered the main factor contributing to total energy inputs in agricultural system. Tillage represents half of operations carried out annually in field. Consequently, there is a potential to reduce energy inputs and production costs by reducing tillage (Ozturk et al., 2006). Since land preparation for double-cropping systems requires timeliness, especially when a moldboard plow is used, reduced tillage, mainly NT systems, are becoming widespread.

Beneficial effects of the crop residue maintenance on soil surface include a reduction of soil erosion and runoff, an increase soil water conservation and soil aggregation, and a less use of fossil fuel is not direct effect of crop residue management (Nakamoto et al., 2006).

In order to combat soil loss and preserve soil moisture, a more attention has been focus on conservative tillage involving  soil   management    practices    that   minimize disruption of soil structure (Samarajeewa et al., 2006). Soil compaction of agricultural soils is a global well recognized problem (Hamza and Anderson, 2005) due to deteriorated soil environment and adverse effects of intensive use of farm machinery on crop yield (Hamza et al., 2011). In China, subsoil compaction was also cause by inappropriate tillage, traffic and field operations on poor time (Zhang et al., 2006). Tillage is one of most effective ways to reduce soil compaction (Daniells, 2012).

Therefore, with selection of desired plant density, appropriate yield can be produced. Corn is among crops least tolerant to high plant population density. Roekel and Coulter (2011) determined a close relationship between maize yield and plant density. The studied hybrid produced maximal yield by a plant density of 81700 plants ha-1 or even higher.

On basis of their research, Berzsenyi and Lap (2005) have found that optimal plant density varied between 67483 and 70161 plants ha-1 regarding the average of the involved hybrids. Total dry matter increases from 6 to 40% when plant density increases from about 79000 to 165000 plants ha-1 in some studies (Turgut et al., 2005; Yilmaz et al., 2007).

According to Pepó and Sárvári (2013), maize is a plant with individual productivity; therefore, plant density determines yield significantly. This experiment was conduct to determine best plant density and tillage system in North of Iran.

 


 MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study was conduct at Agricultural and Natural Resources Research Center Station of Dashte-Naz in MazandranIran for two years 2012-2013 (36°37' N, 53°11' E). The weather in this zone had an average temperature of 24.46°C per month. Receives average rainfall of 231.1 mm from May through October for two years. Weather condition in the experiment site are summarized (Tables 1 and 2).

 

 

 

The soil type was classified as clay loam, with pH 7.2. This experiment was laid out in strip-plot on randomized completely block design basis with four replications. Tillage systems were in three levels: 1. Plow and Disc system (PDS). 2. Disk system (DS) - 3. No tillage (NT). Another factor was plant density in four levels (70000, 80000, 90000 and 100000 plants ha-1).

The previous crop at site was wheat. NPK fertilizers were applied according to yield potentials and soil test levels. N P K (200-100-100) fertilizer used was applied as urea, triple super phosphate and potassium sulfate according to soil test. Hand weeding was used to control weeds. Plants from each plot were harvested in an area of 9 m2. Cultivar corn was a single cross hybrid (Z. mays L. cv. single cross 704) that was popular among growers in Iran. Ear height, plant height, ear length, row number, kernel number in row, ear diameter, wet and dry silage yield, wet and dry ear weight, wet and dry stem weight, wet and dry leaf weight were measured. The site was irrigated with water using a sprinkler irrigation system. Plants were cut at surface from central of four middle rows in plots (area of9 m2).

Data were analyzed using the MSTAT-C procedure to develop the ANOVA for a split-split plot design. The Duncans Multiple Range Test (DMRT) procedure was applied to make tests of simple and interaction effects by MSTAT-C, all differences reported are significant at P 0.05 unless otherwise stated.

 

 


 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Tillage system

Tillage system had significant effect on dry and wet  stem weight at 0.05 probability level (Table 3). The highest dry stem weight was obtained in plow and disk (PDS) system with 7.11 tons ha-1. Dry stem weight (6.50 tons ha-1) in disk system (DS) had no significant difference with No-tillage  system (NTS) with 6.30 t/ha (Table 3). Highest dry forage yield (17.02 tons ha-1) was obtained in plow and disk (PDS) system with 17.02 tons ha-1 that had no significant difference with disk and No-tillage system with 16.31 and 15.50 tons ha-1 respectively (Table 3). The highest silage yield (52.40) was obtained in plow and disk (PDS) that had no significant difference with disk and No-tillage system with 50.13 and 47.23 tons ha-1t/ha respectively (Table 3).

 

 

Plant density

Plant density had significant effect on dry forage yield, dry stem weight, dry ear weight, dry leaf weight, silage yield, stem yield, ear and leaf yield at 0.05 probability levels (Table 3).

The highest dry forage yield (17.77 tons ha-1) and silage yield (53.88 tons ha-1) were produced in 90000 plants ha-1. Plant density had no significant difference in 70000, 80000 and 100000 densities on dry forage yield and silage yield (Table 3). With an increase of density from 70000 to 80000 plants ha-1, ear length decreased. The highest dry stem (7.32 t/ha), dry ear (2.18 t/ha) and dry leaf (8.26 tons ha-1) yield were obtained from the density of 90000 plants ha-1 (Table 3).

High silage yield (53.88 tons ha-1) was achieved from ear (21.94 tons ha-1), stem (22.52 tons ha-1) and leaf (9.42 tons ha-1) fresh weight had significant difference in ear, stem and leaf fresh weight. The effect of plant density had significant difference for silage yield (Table 3).

Shakarami and Partners (2009), in investigating three plant densities (7, 10 and 13 plants m2) of corn recognized that highest grain yield, harvest index, number of grain row and number of grain ear was produced in 10 plant m2 and the highest biological yield obtained from 13 plant m2. Kisic et al. (2010), in the study of crop yield and plant density under different tillage systems found that the plant density and yields of maize, soybean, oilseed rape, winter wheat and spring barley point to the conclusion that high density crop (winter wheat, spring barley and oilseed rape) are suitable for growing under reduced tillage systems. Yield of low-density spring crops (maize and soybean) obtained under no tillage system are not satisfactory, especially in climatically extreme years.

Interaction between tillage system and plant density

The results indicated that most silage yield (55.62 tons ha-1) was obtained from Plow and Disc system (PDS) in density of 70000 plants ha-1 that had no significant difference effects with No tillage system (NT) in density of 90000 plants ha-1 with silageyield of 53.39 tons ha-1. The results also indicated that the most dry forage yield (18.09 tons ha-1) was obtained from Disck system (PDS) in density of 70000 plants ha-1 that had not significant difference effects with No tillage system (NT) in density of 90000 plants ha-1 with silage yield of 17.99 tons ha-1 (Table 4). 

 

 


 CONFLICT OF INTERESTS

The authors have not declared any conflict of interests.



 REFERENCES

Acu-a JCM, Villamil MB (2014). Short-term effects of CCs and compaction on soil properties and soybean production in Illinois. Agron. J. 106:860-870.
Crossref

 

Berzsenyi Z, Lap D Q (2005). Responses of maize (Zea mays L.) hybrids to sowing date, N fertiliser and plant density in different years. Acta. Agronomica. Hungarica. 53(2): 119-131.
Crossref

 

Chen G, Weil R (2010). Penetration of cover crop roots through compacted soils. Plant Soil 331:31-43.
Crossref

 

Ctic Sare (2014). Report of the2013-14 Cover Crop Survey. Joint publication of the Conservation Technology Information Center and the North Central Region Sustainable Agriculture Research and Education Program. 

View

 

Daniells IG (2012). Hardsetting soils: A review. Soil Res. 50:349-359.
Crossref

 

Hamza MA, Al-Adawi SS, Al-Hinai KA (2011). Effect of combined soil water and external load on soil compaction. Soil Res. 49:135-142.
Crossref

 

Hamza MA, Anderson WK (2005). Soil compaction in cropping systems: A review of the nature, causes and possible solutions. Soil Till. Res. 82:121-145.
Crossref

 

Horowitz J, Ebel R, Ueda K (2010). "No-till" farming is a growing practice. Washington, DC: USDA Economic Research Service, Economic Information Bulletin No. 70. 

 

Kisic I, Basic F, Birkas M, Jurisic A, Bicanic V (2010). Crop Yield and Plant Density Tillage systems. Agriculture Conspectus Scientificus 75(1):1-7.

 

Mitchel J, Klonsky K, Stewart D (2015). Silage Corn-Conservation Tillage Northern San Joaquin Valley UC Cooperative Extension. University of California Cooperative Extnsion.

 

Mosaddeghi MR, Mahboubi AA, Safadoust A (2009). Short-term effects of tillage and manure on some soil physical prop-erties and maize root growth in a sandy loam soil in western Iran. Soil and Tillage Res. 104:173-179.
Crossref

 

Nakamoto T, Yamagishi J, Miuara F (2006). Effect of reduced tillage on weeds and sil organisms in winter weat and summer maize cropping on humic Andosols in central Japon. Soil Till. Res. 85:94-106.
Crossref

 

Ozturk H, Ekinci HK, Barut ZB (2006). Energy Analysis of the tillage systems in second crop corn production. J. Sustain. Agric. 28(3):25-37.
Crossref

 

Pepó P, Sárvári M (2013). Agrotechnikai változások. Magyar MezÅ‘gazdaság pp. 24-31.

 

Roekel RJ, Coulter AJ (2011). Agronomic responses of corn to planting date and plant density. Agron. J. 103(5): 1414-1422.
Crossref

 

Samarajeewa KB, Horiuchi DPT, Oba S (2006). Finger millet (Eleucine corocana L. Garetn) as a cover crop on weed control, growth and yieldof soybean under different tillage systems. Soil Till. Res. 90:93-99.
Crossref

 

Shakarami G, Rafiee M (2009). Response of Corn (Zea mays L.) to planting pattern and density in Iran. Am. Eur. J. Agric. Environ. Sci. 5(1):69-73.

 

Turgut I, Duman A, Bilgili U, Acikgoz E (2005). Alternate. Row Spacing and Plant Density Effects on Forage and Dry Matter Yield of Corn Hybrids (Zea mays L.). J. Agron. Crop Sci. 191(2):146-151.
Crossref

 

Yilmaz S, Gozubenli H, Knuskan O, Atis I (2007). Genotype and Plant Density Effects on Corn (Zea mays L.) Forage Yield.Asian J Plant Sci. 6(3):538-541.
Crossref

 

Zhang S, Grip H, Lövdahl L (2006). Effect of soil compaction on hydraulic properties of two loess soils in China. Soil and Tillage Res. 90:117-125.
Crossref

 




          */?>