African Journal of
Microbiology Research

  • Abbreviation: Afr. J. Microbiol. Res.
  • Language: English
  • ISSN: 1996-0808
  • DOI: 10.5897/AJMR
  • Start Year: 2007
  • Published Articles: 5232

Full Length Research Paper

Bacterial community composition and diversity along the southern coastlines of the Atlantic Ocean in Cape Town, South Africa

Ola A. Olapade
  • Ola A. Olapade
  • Department of Biology and the Center for Sustainability and the Environment, 611 East Porter Street, Albion College, Albion, MI 49224 USA.
  • Google Scholar


  •  Received: 07 July 2020
  •  Accepted: 14 August 2020
  •  Published: 30 September 2020

 ABSTRACT

The spatial distribution and diversity within bacterioplankton assemblages in four coastal sites along the southern points of the Atlantic Ocean were examined using the Illumina high-throughput that targets 16S rRNA genes to examine indigenous bacterial assemblages in the littoral zones along the coast of the ocean. Results of the study showed very similar bacterial representation between the coastal sites with majority of the sequences affiliated with members of the Proteobacteria (52 to 59%), Bacteriodetes (21 to 31%) followed by Actinobacteria (3 to 9.5%) and Planctomycetes (2.1 to 4.5%).  The bacterioplankton assemblages at each site examined were quite diverse, with members of the Gammaproteobacteria found as the most abundant bacterial class among the four sites.  However, clear differences were observed among the sites at the order level, with the Chromatiales the more dominant in the eastern coastal (CPTI) sites, while clades belonging to the Flavobacteriales and Rhodobacterales were more prevalent in the two western (CPTA) coastal sites.  While the results of unweighted pair group method with arithmethic (UPGMA) clustering and principle coordinate (PCoA) revealed two spatially separate clusters among sites, canonical correspondence (CCA) analysis indicated that environmental variables such as temperature, pH and conductivity were probably the major influencers of bacterial occurrences at the coastal sites.

 

Key words: Bacterioplankton assemblages, ocean, 16S rRNA gene sequencing.


 INTRODUCTION

The bacterioplankton assemblages in oceans have been described as comprising one of the largest and active microbial assemblages in the biosphere (Whitman et al.,1998; Salazar and Sunagawa, 2017), where they actively partake in the biogeochemical influxes and cycling  of  various   nutrients   and   organic  compounds (Azam and Malfatti, 2007; Falkowski et al., 2008, Zehr and Kudela, 2011). Contrasting findings have been previously reported regarding bacterial diversity and biogeographic distributions in marine systems, especially in tropical oceans (Pommier et al., 2007; Fuhrman et al., 2008; Milici  et  al.,  2016). Milici et  al. (2016)  reported  a clear biogeographic pattern with a double inverted latitudinal gradient, with higher diversity in planktonic bacteria population in mid-latitudinal regions, and decreasing towards the equator in the Atlantic Ocean in their study. In contrast, Fuhrman et al. (2008) found a negative correlation between species richness and latitude both in the Northern and Southern hemisphere. Additionally, interesting observations regarding microbial provincialism and their discrete distributions in various marine habitats have been previously documented (Brown et al., 2009; Jeffries et al., 2015).
 
In order to better understand the structural compositions and diversity within bacterial assemblages in marine systems, this study was conducted on several coastal sites along the southern points of the Atlantic Ocean in Cape Town, South Africa by examining indigenous populations in the bacterioplankton communities using Illumina high-throughput sequencing approach that targets the 16S ribosomal RNA genes.  The four sites that were selected for the study are located along the coastline within the metropolitan city of Cape Town, between the Cape of Good Hope and the Cape of Agulhas two touristy landmarks that are prone to various anthropogenic influences. The Atlantic Ocean is considered the second largest of the world’s five oceans, second only to the Pacific Ocean, with a body of water located between Africa, Europe, the Arctic, America and the Southern Ocean. The southern parts of the Atlantic Ocean where this study was conducted is located around the metropolitan area of the city of Cape Town in South Africa, between the Cape of Good  Hope (~34° 21´24.63ʺ S, 18° 28´ 26.36ʺ E) and Cape Agulhas (~34° 49´ 59.6ʺ S, 20° 00´ 0ʺ E), with mostly rocky headlands of coastlines in between these two landmarks that are about 90 miles apart (International Hydrographic Organization, 2002).  The main aim of the study was to examine the taxonomic profiles of the microbial assemblages indigenous to these coastal marine sites as well as determine the influences of various environmental factors, such as temperature, pH and dissolved oxygen concentrations on the structural composition and diversity within the assemblages at the four sites.

 


 MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sample collection and measurement of environmental variables
 
Samples were collected from the surface waters along the rocky headland coasts of the Atlantic Ocean in Cape Town, South Africa in September 2019. Specifically, water samples were collected from approximately 1 to 5 m depth into sterile falcon tubes from four separate sites along the ocean front close to the metropolitan city of Cape Town in South Africa (Figure 1).  Collected samples were filtered through 0.2 µm pore-size polyethersulfone membrane filters and then stored frozen until nucleic acid extraction was performed. While on site, the water chemistry properties were also measured (Table 1) with probes for temperature, conductivity, pH, dissolved oxygen and oxidation-reduction potential using the YSI model 556 MPS multi-probe system (YSI Incorporated, USA).   
 
DNA extraction and 16S rRNA gene pyrosequencing
 
Community  DNA   was  extracted  from  the  filters  using  FastDNA SPIN Extraction kit (MP Biomedicals, Solon, OH, USA) and eluted in 50 µl of sterile deionized water according to the vendor’s instructions. Determination of DNA quantity was then carried out with a NanoDrop Spectrophotometer (2% accuracy/range of purity, NanoDrop 2000, Thermo Scientific, Delaware, USA). The quality of extracted DNA was further assessed by amplifying with the 16S rRDA universal primer sets, 27F (5’ AGA GTT GTA TCM TGG CTC AG 3’) and 1492R (5’GGT TAC CTT GTT ACG ACT T3’) as previously described in Olapade (2013, 2015).
 
The Illumina’s 16S metagenomic sequencing library preparation protocol was used in generating amplicon libraries using universal primer pairs that consisted of an Illumina-specific overhang sequence and locus-specific sequence: 926wF_Illum: 5’-TCGTCGGCAGCGTCAGA TGTGTATAAGAGACAGAAACTYAAAKGAATTGRCGG and 1392R_Illum: 5’GTCTCGT GGGCTCGGAGATGTGTATAAGAGACAGACGGGCGGTGTGTRC.  The pair of primers targets the V6-V8 hypervariable regions of 16S rRNA genes of all microbial groups (Jeffries et al., 2015).
 
 
Quality trimming and filtering of low-quality sequences
 
The raw pyrosequencing data was processes and analyzed using the open-source software program, Mothur (Mothur v. 1.36.1; http://www.mothur.org) as previously described (Schloss et al. 2009). Barcode and the fusion primers are trimmed before any of the bioinformatics commences. Sequences reads without a barcode or a primer region are dropped and not considered for further analysis. Low quality sequences that is, those less than 300 base pairs as well as those with less than average quality score (value of 25 or less) are filtered out and deleted (Zhang et al., 2012). Operational taxonomic units (OTUs) were constructed by comparing them to close relatives via global pairwise alignment (Altschul et al., 1997) to determine their close relatives using the BLASTN (blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov) system. Chimeras were detected in the sequences that were later omitted for further analysis by using the UCHIME version 4.1 program (Edgar et al., 2011).
 
Statistical and diversity analysis
 
The sequences were clustered into OTUs after setting 97% distance limit or cutoff similarity value (Tindall et al., 2009; Edgar et al., 2011) and then analyzed for species richness, Shannon Index, Simpson’s (Reciprocal) Index of diversity, species evenness, ACE richness estimate and Chao-1 richness indicator (Chao, 1984, 1987; Chao and Lee, 1992; Schloss and Handelsman, 2006).  In order to determine whether total diversity was covered by the numbers of sequences screened, Good’s Library Coverage values were calculated as previously described (Good, 1953; Kemp and Aller, 2004). Alpha, beta and gamma diversity calculations were also carried out according to Whittaker (1972); in addition to rarefaction analysis that was performed to also determine the diversity  of   the clone  libraries   using   the   freeware  program  by CHUNLAB Bioinformatics Made Easy (CLcommunity version 3.30). Taxon exclusive (XOR) analysis was carried out based on the taxonomic assignment of sequencing read to reveal the sequences present in one library but absent in the others as described by Li and Godzik (2006). The UPGMA Fast UniFrac analysis was used to cluster the sequenced microbial communities based on phylogenetic relationship and abundance in order to generate a dendogram (Hamady et al., 2010), while the multi-dimensional UniFrac distance matrixes were then converted into vectors using the Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) as described by Jolliffe (1989). Additionally, canonical correspondent analysis (CCA) was also used to analyze and examine which of the bacterial assemblages corresponds to the independent environmental variables that were measured at the study sites according to Ter Braak and Verdonschot (1995).


 RESULTS

Environmental variables
 
The environmental variables measured at the four coastal sites examined along the ocean front included temperature, pH, dissolved oxygen (DO), conductivity and oxidation-reduction potential (ORP). Most of these variables were quite similar among the studied sites, with the exception of DO that was relatively higher in the two eastern sites (CPTI1 and CPTI2) closest to the Indian Ocean.  Specifically, water temperature among the four coastal sites ranged from 14.76 to 14.89°C and slightly higher in the two easterly located sites, while pH was also in the range of 8.80 to 9.14 between the western and the eastern sites of the ocean, respectively (Table 1). 
 
Community composition and diversity analysis
 
Based on the 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequencing, the relative abundance of bacterial taxa was determined at different taxonomic levels, and majority of the bacterial sequences (~99%) were ascribed to 29 different known bacterial phyla.  Out of these 29 different phyla, bacterial members belonging to the Proteobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Actinobacteria, Planctomycetes and Verrucomicrobia were observed to have accounted for more than 90% of total community compositions among the sequences obtained from the four coastal sites (Figure 2A).  Specifically, members of the Proteobacteria were the most   numerically   dominant   phyla   in   the   four  sites, accounting for between 52 and 59% of total bacterial sequences. The Bacteroidetes were in close second with between 21 to 31% sequence representations, followed by members of the Actinobacteria and Planctomycetes (between 3 to 9.50% and 2.10 to 4.50%, respectively).  The next 25 bacterial phyla (including the members of the Acidobacteria, Firmicutes, Tenericutes, Rhodothermaeota, Cyanobacteria, Deinoccocus-Thermus, Gemmatimonadetes, among others) represented less than 10% of the total bacterial sequence abundance. Among the Proteobacteria, members of the Gammaproteobacteria were the predominant class, representing between 32 to 34%, followed closely by the Alphaproteobacteria with 13 to 14% representation among the four studied sites (Figure 2B). The Chromatiales were the  dominant   groups   among   the    members    of   the Gammaproteobacteria at the order level, followed closely by the Flavobacteriales and the Rhodobacterales, both members of the Flavobacteria and Alphaproteobacteria classes, respectively (Figure 2B). 
 
The Good Library Coverage analysis revealed that majority of the bacterial sequences was covered among the sites (Table 2). This result is also somewhat corroborated by the rarefaction curves that showed sufficient coverage in the numbers of the different bacterial phyla contained within three of the four assemblages examined at the coastal sites (Figure 3). The rarefaction curves revealed that three of the four microbial assemblages examined were tending towards saturation, with the exception of the CPTA1 site, that also had the highest Good Library Coverage of 99.86%.  Diversity  measures  such as the Shannon diversity index showed that bacterial diversity was comparatively higher in the two eastern coastal sites (CPTI1 and CPTI2) than in the two western Atlantic Ocean sites that were examined.  Results of bacterial richness and species diversity based on ACE and Chao1 while not showing a distinct delineation among the four coastal sites, however revealed that the CPTA1 site had the highest diversity compared to the three other sites.  This result is further validated by the results of the taxon exclusive analysis of the bacterial assemblages at the phylum level that showed disparate differences in bacterial diversity among the sites (Table 3). The bacterial assemblages found within the CPTA1 coastal site comprised of several bacterial phyla that were totally absent in the three other sites including the Armatimonadetes, TM6, Lentisphaerae, BRC1, TDNP, SR1, Elusimicrobia, Fibrobacteres and WS6. While the CPTA2 site comprised of Deferribacteres that were absent in the other sites, and phyla belonging to Aminicenantes, GN04 and Synergistetes were exclusively found in CPTI1 and CPTI2, respectively.
 
 
 
 
Hierarchical clustering based on the Fast UniFrac distance matrix revealed that the bacterial sequences obtained from the two  bacterioplankton  assemblages  in the western Atlantic Ocean sites were more similar, but were a bit distant from those in the easterly located assemblages (Figure 4).  The PCoA that was also carried out to further explain the variations in bacterial community compositions between the four coastal sites also corroborated the results of the UPGMA clustering.  Three axes were extracted that together explained 90.1% of the observed variance and showed that the bacterial assemblages within the two western sites (CPTA1 and CPTA2) clustered along the PC1 axis, while those from the eastern sites of the ocean (CPTI1 and CPTI2) clustered around the PC2 axis (Figure 5).
 
CCA was carried out to better understand bacterial distribution patterns along the coastal sites, especially regarding the spatial occurrences of the various environmental factors that were measured. Therefore, temperature, pH, conductivity, DO and ORP were included in the CCA analysis. The environmental variables in the two CCA axes (that is, CCA1 and CCA2) together explained more than 98.46% of total variations in the bacterial abundance distribution (Figure 6).  Temperature, pH, conductivity and DO (p < 0.01) all contributed  significantly  to  the  total  variance  and were closely associated with the first and second CCA axes.
 
 


 DISCUSSION

In this study, the 16S rRNA gene sequences obtained from 4 different coastal locations along the southernmost parts of the Atlantic Ocean in Cape Town, South Africa were analyzed in order to characterize the bacterial community structures in response to potential changes in environmental variables between these spatially different coastal marine sites.  The 16S rRNA occurrences diverse phylogenetic groups within the assemblages revealed close similarity in the dominant taxa among the four coastal sites examined. Bacterial members at each of the sites were mostly dominated by the Gammaproteobacteria class followed by the Flavobacteria. The numerical dominance of members of the Proteobacteria and Bacteroidetes as observed in this study is consistent with previous studies that have also reported the high occurrences of these two bacterial phyla in various marine systems (Brown et al., 2009; Seo et al., 2017; Wang et al., 2018; Wu et al., 2019).
 
The relatively high occurrences of members of the Gammaproteobacteria, Alphaproteobacteria and Flavobacteria among the sequences in the four coastal sites examined in this study are fairly consistent with those reported for oceanic waters by previous studies (Kirchman, 2002; Rappe and Giovannoni, 2003; Schmidt et al., 1991; Raes et al., 2017; Wang et al., 2018; Wu et al., 2019).  These bacterial groups are known to be major constituents of microbial assemblages in various marine systems (Kirchman, 2002; Rappe and Giovannoni, 2003), especially in coastal environments because of their propensity for the high availability of enhanced dissolved organic matter that are copiously produced by photosynthetically active autotrophs in this euphotic area of the ocean.  More specifically, previous studies have revealed strong correlations between significant occurrences of these particular bacterial phyla and dissolved organic matters associated with phytoplankton productivity (Calson et al., 2009) and other environmental variables, including phosphate concentration (Morris et al., 2010; Seo et al., 2017), salinity and temperature (Milici et al., 2016; Wu et al., 2019) in coastal marine waters. For instance, Milici et al. (2016) particularly found bacterial diversity to change drastically with changing water temperature in the Atlantic Ocean, with the highest species diversity documented at between 15 and 20°C, but with significant reduction when water temperature was above 20°C. The results documented in this study seems to validate these particular previous observations, given that the water temperature of the four coastal sites examined here were on average around 15°C and that most of the diversity measures, especially as indicated by both ACE and Chao1 showed species richness among the microbial assemblages to be relatively high in  all  the coastal sites examined.
 
The CCA results of this study showed that combinations of the major environmental variables that were measured at the sites sufficiently explained the distribution of the different bacterial phyla elucidated among the coastal sites examined. Although other variables such as inorganic nutrients, including phosphate and nitrate concentrations were not included in the analysis conducted in this study, however, other studies have previously shown strong correlations between their concentrations and the spatial distributions and diversity of bacterial assemblages in marine waters (Raes et al., 2017; Seo et al., 2017). Raes et al. (2017) found strong correlations between total dissolved inorganic nitrogen, chlorophyll a, phytoplankton community structure and primary productivity with bacterial richness in their study on the surface waters of the eastern Indian Ocean.  While, Seo et al. (2017) in their study on the coastal waters of the South Sea of Korea similarly reported significant influences of both phosphate and dissolved oxygen concentrations on the bacterial community compositions found in different stations along the coast of the sea.
 
The results obtained from this study that was designed to examine the occurrences, distribution and diversity of bacterial populations within the coastal bacterioplankton assemblages in the Atlantic Ocean around Cape Town, South Africa further validate and strongly corroborate several previous studies where various members of the heterotrophic bacterial populations, especially the Gammaproteobacteria and Alphaproteobacteria classes have also been observed dominant, especially within the coastal euphotic zones of marine environments (Wu et al., 2019).  Conclusively, the multivariate analysis of the bacterial assemblages from the coastal sites in this study, revealed two spatially separate clusters among the sites, whereas environmental variables such as temperature, pH and conductivity were probably the major influencers of bacterial occurrences at the four coastal sites. Therefore, the results from this study further validate the interconnected of environmental variables and microbial assemblages as well as the potential influences of such factors on the ecology of bacterial populations in coastal aquatic environments.


 CONFLICT OF INTERESTS

The author has not declared any conflict of interests.


 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The author appreciate Mbulelo Mamani and the other staff of 15 on Orange, Autograph Collection Hotel in Cape Town for the support during field sampling at the Cape of Good Hope and also thank various staff members of CHUNLAB (Bioinformatics Made Easy, Seoul National University) for assistance during sequencing and bioinformatics data analysis. The study was generously supported by the Albion College Provost’s Office, Lori Duff and the award by the Hewlett‑Mellon FDC funds made available during the sabbatical leave period that was utilized for this study.



 REFERENCES

Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schaffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W, Lipman (1997). Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Research 25:3389-3402.
Crossref

 

Azam F, Malfatti F (2007). Microbial structuring of marine systems. Nature Reviews Microbiology 5:782-791.
Crossref

 
 

Brown MV, Philip GK, Bunge JA, Smith MC, Bissett A. Lauro FM (2009). Microbial community structure in the North Pacific Ocean. International Society for Microbial Ecology Journal 3:1374-1386.
Crossref

 
 

Calson CA, Morris R, Parsons R, Treusch AH, Giovannoni SJ, Vergin K (2009). Seasonal dynamics of SAR11 populations in the euphotic and mesopelagic zones of the northwestern Sargasso Sea. International Society for Microbial Ecology Journal 3(3):283-295.
Crossref

 
 

Chao A (1984). Nonparametric estimation of the number of classes in a population. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics 11:265-270.

 
 

Chao A (1987). Estimating the population size for capture-recapture data with unequal catchability. Biometrics 43:783-791.
Crossref

 
 

Chao A, Lee SM (1992). Estimating the number of classes via sample coverage. Journal of American Statistical Association 87(417):210-217.
Crossref

 
 

Edgar RC, Haas BJ, Clemente JC, Quince C, Knight R (2011). UCHIME improves sensitivity and speed of chimera detection. Bioinformatics 27:2194-2200.
Crossref

 
 

Falkowski PG, Fenchel T, DeLong EF (2008). The microbial engines that drive Earth's biogeochemical cycles. Science 320:1034-1039.
Crossref

 
 

Fuhrman JA, Steele JA, Hewson I, Schwalbach L, Brown MV, Green JL, Brown JH (2008). A latitudinal diversity gradient in planktonic marine bacteria. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 105:7774-7778.
Crossref

 
 

Good IJ (1953). The population frequencies of species and the estimation of population parameters. Biometrika 40:237-264.
Crossref

 
 

Hamady M, Lozupone C, Knight R (2010). Fast UniFrac: facilitating high-throughput phylogenetic analyses of microbial communities including analysis of pyrosequencing and PhyloChip data. The International Society for Microbial Ecology Journal 4:17-27.
Crossref

 
 

International Hydrographic Organization (2002). Limits of Oceans and Seas. International Hydrographic Organization Special Publication 23, 1953.

 
 

Jeffries TC, Ostrowski M, Williams RB, Xie C, Jensen RM, Grzymski JJ, Senstius SJ, Givskov M, Hoeke R, Philip GK, Neches RY, Drautz-Moses DI, Chénard C, Paulsen IT, Federico, Lauro FM, (2015). Spatially extensive microbial biogeography of the Indian Ocean provides insights into the unique community of a pristine coral atoll. Scientific Reports 5:15383.
Crossref

 
 

Jolliffe IT (1989). Principal Component Analysis. Springer-Verlag, New York.

 
 

Kemp PF, Aller JY (2004). Estimating prokaryotic diversity: When are 16S rDNA large enough? Limnology and Oceanography Methods 2:114-125.
Crossref

 
 

Kirchman DL (2002). The ecology of Cytophaga-Flavobacteria in aquatic environments. FEMS Microbiology Ecology 39(2):91-100.
Crossref

 
 

Li W, Godzik A (2006). Cd-hit: a fast program for clustering and comparing large sets of protein or nucleotide sequences. Bioinformatics 22:1658-1659.
Crossref

 
 

Milici M, Tomasch J, Wos-Oxley ML, Wang H, Jauregui R, Camarinha-Silva A, Deng ZL, Plumeier I, Giebel HA, Wurst M, Pieper DH (2016). Low diversity of planktonic bacteria in the tropical ocean. Science Report 6:19054.
Crossref

 
 

Morris RM, Nunn BL, Frazar C, Goodlett DR, Ting YS, Rocap G (2010). Comparative metagenomics reveals ocean-scale shifts in microbial nutrient utilization and energy transduction. International Society for Microbial Ecology Journal 4(5):673-685.
Crossref

 
 

Olapade OA (2013). Molecular Characterization of Bacterial Phylogenetic and Functional Groups at the site of the Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill along the Gulf of Mexico. Journal of Petroleum and Environmental Biotechnology 4:144.
Crossref

 
 

Olapade OA (2015). Phylogenetic characterization and community diversity of hydrocarbon-degrading bacterial populations in soil microcosms enriched with various aromatic hydrocarbons. Journal of Bioremediation and Biodegradation. 
Crossref

 
 

Pommier T, Canback B, Reimann L, Bostrom KH, Simu K, Lundberg P, Tunlid A, Hagström Å (2007). Global patterns of diversity and community structure in marine bacterioplankton. Molecular Ecology 16:867-880.
Crossref

 
 

Raes EJ, Brodrossy L, Van de Kamp J, Bisset A, Waite AM (2017). Marine bacterial richness increases towards higher latitudes in the eastern Indian Ocean. Limnology and Oceanography Letters 3:10-19.
Crossref

 
 

Rappe MS, Giovannoni SJ (2003). The uncultured microbial majority. Annual Review of Microbiology 57(1):369-394.
Crossref

 
 

Salazar G, Sunagawa S (2017). Marine microbial diversity. Current Biology 27:R489-R494.
Crossref

 
 

Schloss PD, Handelsman J (2006). Introducing SONS, a tool for operational taxonomic unit-based comparison of microbial community memberships and structures Applied and Environmental Microbiology 72:6773-6779.
Crossref

 
 

Schloss PD, Westcott SL, Ryabin T, Hall JR, Hartman EB, Hollister EB, Lesniewski RA, Oakley BB, Parks DH, Robinson CJ, Sahl JW (2009). Introducing mothur: open-source-, platform-independent, community-supported software for describing and comparing microbial communities. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 75(23):7537-7541.
Crossref

 
 

Schmidt TM, Delong E, Pace N (1991). Analysis of a marine picoplankton community by 16S rRNA gene cloning and sequencing. Journal of Bacteriology 173:4371-4378.
Crossref

 
 

Seo JH, Kang I, Yang SJ, Cho JC (2017). Characterization of spatial distribution of the bacterial community in the south sea of Korea. PLOS ONE. 
Crossref

 
 

Ter Braak CJF, Verdonschot PFM (1995). Canonical correspondence analysis and related multivariate methods in aquatic ecology. Aquatic Sciences 57:255-289.
Crossref

 
 

Tindall BJ, Rossello-Mora R, Busse HJ, Ludwig W, Kämpfer P (2009). Notes on the characterization of prokaryotes strains for taxonomic purposes. International Journal of Systematics and Evolutionary Microbiology 60:249-266.
Crossref

 
 

Wang S, Yu M, Wei J, Huang M, Shi X, Chen H (2018). Microbial community composition and diversity in the Indian Ocean deep sea REY-rich muds. PLOS ONE. 
Crossref

 
 

Whitman WB, Coleman DC, Wiebe WJ (1998). Prokaryotes: The unseen majority. Proceedings of the Natural Academy of Sciences 95(12):6578-6583.
Crossref

 
 

Whittaker RH (1972). Evolution and measurement of species diversity. Taxon 21:213-251.
Crossref

 
 

Wu C, Kan J, Liu H, Pujari L, Guo C, Wang X, Sun J (2019). Heterotrophic bacteria dominate the diazotrophic community in the eastern Indian Ocean (EIO) during pre-southwest monsoon. Microbial Ecology 78:804-819.
Crossref

 
 

Zhang T, Shao M-F, Ye L (2012). 454 Pyrosequencing reveals bacterial diversity of activated sludge from 14 sewage treatment plants. International Society for Microbial Ecology Journal 6:1137-1147.
Crossref

 
 

Zehr JP, Kudela RM (2011). Nitrogen cycle of the open ocean: from genes to ecosystems. Annual Review of Marine Sciences 3:197-225.
Crossref

 

 




          */?>