International Journal of
Science and Technology Education Research

  • Abbreviation: Int. J. Sci. Technol. Educ. Res.
  • Language: English
  • ISSN: 2141-6559
  • DOI: 10.5897/IJSTER
  • Start Year: 2010
  • Published Articles: 79

Full Length Research Paper

Exploring teaching practices of science and technology in Malawi primary schools

Vanwyk Khobidi Chikasanda
  • Vanwyk Khobidi Chikasanda
  • Technical Education Department, University of Malawi - The Polytechnic, P/Bag 303, Blantyre 3, Malawi.
  • Google Scholar
Doris Mtemang?ombe
  • Doris Mtemang?ombe
  • Technical Education Department, University of Malawi - The Polytechnic, P/Bag 303, Blantyre 3, Malawi.
  • Google Scholar
Lusungu Nyirenda
  • Lusungu Nyirenda
  • Technical Education Department, University of Malawi - The Polytechnic, P/Bag 303, Blantyre 3, Malawi.
  • Google Scholar
Molly Kapengule
  • Molly Kapengule
  • Technical Education Department, University of Malawi - The Polytechnic, P/Bag 303, Blantyre 3, Malawi.
  • Google Scholar


  •  Received: 04 July 2014
  •  Accepted: 06 November 2014
  •  Published: 24 December 2014

References

 

Banks F, McCormick R (2006). A case study of the inter-relationship between science and technology: England 1984-2004. In: M. J. de Vries & I. Mottier (Eds.), International handbook of technology education: reviewing the past twenty years (pp. 285-311). Rotterdam: Sense.

 

Barnes B, Jim M, Sayers S (2002). Issues in design and technology teaching. London: Rout ledge Falmer.

 

Bencze J (2010). Promoting student-led science and technology projects in elementary teacher education: entry into core pedagogical practices through technological design. Int. J. Technol. Design Educ. 20(1):43-62.
Crossref

 

Borko H (2004). Professional Development and Teacher Learning: Mapping the Terrain. Educ. Researcher 33(8):3-15.
Crossref

 

Brown JS, Collins A, Duguid P (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educ. Res. 18(1):32-42.
Crossref

 

Brown JS, Duguid P (1991). Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation. Organization Science, 2(1):40-57.
Crossref

 

Cohen L, Manion L, Morrison KRB (2011). Research methods in education. London: Routledge.

 

Cowie B, Bell B (1999). A model of formative assessment in science education. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy Pract. 6(1):101.

 

Creswell JW (2007). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

 

Davies D, Rogers M (2000). Pre-service primary teachers' planning for Science and Technology activities: Influences and constraints. [Article]. Res. Sci. Technol. Educ. 18(2):215-225. 

 

De Miranda MA (2004). The grounding of a discipline: Cognition and instruction in technology education. Int. J. Technol. Design Educ. 14(1):61-77.
Crossref

 

de Vries MJ (2009). The developing field of technology education: An introduction. In: A. T. Jones & M. J. de Vries (Eds.), International handbook of research and development in technology education (pp. 1-9). Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense Publishers.

 

Dzama ENN (2006). Malawian secondary school students' learning of science: historical background, performance and beliefs. University of the Western Cape.

 

Ebay (2013). African Music instruments. Retrieved 27 June 2014

view

 

Eshach H, Fried MN (2005). Should Science be Taught in Early Childhood? J. Sci. Educ. Technol. 14(3). 
Crossref

 

Fabiano E (2002). Senior secondary science and technology: Students book 3. Blantyre, Malawi: MacMillan Malawi.

 

Fensham PJ (2008). Science education policy-making: Eleven Emerging Issues. Paris: UNESCO.

 

Fernandez T, Ritchie G, Barker M (2008). A sociocultural analysis of mandated curriculum change: The implementation of a new senior physics curriculum in New Zealand schools. J. Curriculum Stud. 40(2):187-213.
Crossref

 

Geraedts C, Boersma KT, Eijkelhof HMC (2006). Towards coherent science and technology education. J. Curriculum Stud. 38(3):307-326.
Crossref

 

Harrison M (1994). Science and technology: Partnership or divorce. In: F. Banks (Ed.), Teaching Technology (pp. 238-245). London: Routledge.

 

Layton D (1994). A school subject in the making?: The search for fundamentals. In D. Layton (Ed.), Paris: UNESCO. Innovat. Sci. Technol. Educ. 5:11-28.

 

Malawi Institute of Education (2007a). Science and technology: Learners' Guide for Standard 5. Zomba, Malawi: Malawi Institute of Education.

 

Malawi Institute of Education (2007b). Science and technology: Learners' Guide for Standard 6. Zomba, Malawi: Malawi Institute of Education.

 

Malawi Institute of Education (2008). Science and technology: Learners' Guide for Standard 7. Zomba, Malawi: Malawi Institute of Education.

 

Malawi Institute of Education (2009). Science and technology: Learners' Guide for Standard 8. Zomba, Malawi: Malawi Institute of Education.

 

MANEB (2004). Physical Science chief examiner's report. Zomba, Malawi: MANEB.

 

Mawson B (2003). Beyond `The design process': An alternativepedagogy for technology education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 13(2):117-128.
Crossref

 

Mawson B (2010). Children's developing understanding of technology. Int. J. Technol. Design Educ. 20(1):1-13.
Crossref

 

Mbano NM (2003). The effect of Cognitive development, age and gender on the performance of secondary school pupils in science and other subjects. Malawi J. Dev. Educ. 1:55-76.

 

McCormick R (2004). Issues of learning and knowledge in technology education. Int. J. Technol. Design Educ. 14(1):21-44.
Crossref

 

Ministry of Economic Planning and Development (2005). Millennium Development Goals: Malawi report Retrieved December 6, 2007.

 

Ministry of Economic Planning and Development (2012). Malawi Growth and Development Strategy II 2012-2016. Lilongwe, Malawi: Ministry of Economic Planning and Development.

 

Ministry of Education and Vocational Training (2001a). Primary school teaching syllabus for Standards 5, 6, 7 and 8. Domasi, Malawi: Malawi Institute of Education.

 

Ministry of Education and Vocational Training (2001b). Senior secondary teaching syllabus: Science and technology, Forms 3-4. Domasi, Malawi: Malawi Institute of Education.

 

Nampota D, Thompson J, Wikeley F (2009). The development of human capacity in Malawi: The role of science and technology. Int. Rev. Educ. 55(1):59-74.
Crossref

 

National Economic Council (2003). Vision 2020: The national long term development perspective for Malawi. 

 

National Research Council of Malawi (2002). Science and Technology Policy for Malawi Retrieved November 9, 2006.

 

Naughton J (1994). What is technology? In: F. Banks (Ed.), London: Routledge. Teach. Technol. pp.7-12.

 

Pedretti E, Nazir J (2011). Currents in STSE education: Mapping a complex field, 40 years on. Science Education 95(4):601-626. doi: 10.1002/sce.20435
Crossref

 

Phiri ADK (2008). Exploring the integration of indigenous science in the primary school science curriculum in Malawi. (PhD), Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia.

 

Rogoff B (1995). Observing sociocultural activity on three planes: Participatory appropriation, guided participation and apprenticeship. In J. V. Wertsch, P. del Río & A. Alvarez (Eds.), Sociocultural Studies of Mind. New York: Cambridge University Press pp.139-164.
Crossref

 

Strauss A, Corbin J (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage.

 

Timperley H, Wilson A, Barrar H, Fund I (2007). Teacher professional learning and development: Best evidence synthesis (BES). Wellington, NZ: Ministry of Education.

 

Tongco DC (2007). Purposive sampling as a tool for informant selection. Ethnobotany Research & Applications, 5:147-158. Retrieved from

view

 

UNESCO (2007). The Perth Declaration on Science and Technology. Sustainable development and STE. Perth, Australia: UNESCO.

 

Wenger E (1999). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

 

Williams PJ (2000). Design: The only methodology of technology. J. Technol. Educ. 11(2):48-60.