Full Length Research Paper
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
Sheep breeding is an expanding activity (Güetter, 2011; Gianlorenço, 2013). Brazil is the 18th largest producer with herd estimated at 25.43 million of sheep and goats (De Zen et al., 2014). However, gastrointestinal nematodes are a major limiting factor to sheep production, especially in tropical regions (Vieira, 2008).
Damages caused by helminth infection include less weight gain, poor quality of wool, higher mortality, lower yield carcass, lower milk production and low fertility. These losses are due to clinical signs such as diarrhea, anemia, hemorrhage, prostration and weakness, adversely affecting profitability and animal welfare (Szpatowski, 2010). In addition, there are increased costs for the acquisition of antiparasitic drugs and labor use.
Among the parasites that infect sheep, are the trichostrongylid from Trichostrongylidae family, which includes species of genera Trichostrongylus, Haemonchus, Ostertargia, Nematodirus and Cooperia.
The integration of management systems is the main concept in the search for sustainable control of helminths (Hoste and Torres-Acosta, 2011). The search for strategies such as integrated grazing to other species and the use of natural therapies has been frequently observed (Batatinha et al, 2011; Joshi et al, 2011).
Another important aspect relates to the pharmacological resistance to chemical anthelmintics (Szpatowski, 2010). Natural measures for parasite control can minimize resistance to chemical anthelmintics (Houdijk et al., 2012). There are records of resistance to many drugs commonly used (Kaplan, 2004). Resistance has been observed in various chemical groups. The indiscriminate use of these drugs select resistant isolates, and therefore, these products do not end up performing the control of nematodes infections satisfactorily. In Brazil, the problem occurs in various regions (Vieira et al., 1992; Soccol and Pohl-de-Souza, 1997; Rosalinski-Moraes et al., 2007; Sczesny-Moraes et al., 2010, Vila Nova et al., 2014; Madruga et al., 2015). The resistance is gradually advancing on the latest available chemical groups. It is necessary to change the concept that the chemical anthelmintics are an inexhaustible source and only alternative for the control of parasites (FAO, 2003).
Today, the consumer market are showing growing demand for food products free from chemical residues (Resende, 2013). Organic farming, agroecology, biodynamic and organic have expanded rapidly in the world. These production systems contribute to the socio-economic sustainability of the producer (Neves et al., 2016). These systems are grounded in agroecological principles, not allowing the use of chemical pesticides.
Buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum Moench) is a dicotyledonous plant belonging to the Polygonaceae family, which has a high protein content, with high content of essential amino acid lysine (Zhou et al., 2012). The seeds have condensed tannins, flavonoids and phenolic acids (Steadman et al., 2001). Rutin, is a useful bioflavonoid in the treatment of various medical conditions, mainly due to its antioxidant action (Karamac, 2010). The highest concentration of rutin in buckwheat is found in the leaves and flowers (Vojtíšková et al., 2012).
Tannins exert direct anthelmintic action in reducing of the the fertility of female nematodes (Otero and Hidalgo, 2004), and indirect by increasing the immune response to protect the ingested protein of rumen degradation, increasing their availability in the lower gastrointestinal tract of animals (Ketzis et al., 2006). The anthelmintic activity in vitro of tannins was characterized by reduction of hatching, development and motility of larvae and adults (Brunet et al, 2008; Joshi et al 2011.). In vivo cause reduction of eggs per gram of faeces (OPG) and the parasite load (Minho et al, 2008; Max et al, 2009; Mupeyo et al, 2011; Oliveira et al, 2011).
Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate the anthelmintic potential of the hydroalcoholic extract of Fagopyrum esculentum Moench seeds (ETM) in control of gastrointestinal nematodes of sheep in vitro, as well as to evaluate the antioxidant activity, total content of polyphenols, flavonoids and condensed tannins.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Plant material and extract preparation
Buckwheat seeds were collected in commercial farming in São João do Ivaí, Paraná, Brazil. The botanical material was selected by the absence of macroscopic changes in its surface constitution. Drying was carried out in a forced ventilation air oven at a temperature of 40°C and then maceration in a Wiley mill.
To obtain the hydroalcoholic extract of buckwheat seeds to 10%, 90 g of seed, 240 mL of distilled water and 570 mL of absolute ethanol were used. After this, the solution was kept under constant mechanical stirring at environment temperature for 24 h. Subsequent vacuum filtration was performed three times, after each filtration adding new hydroalcoholic solution in the same above ratios. The extract was concentrated in rotaevaporator and lyophilized.
Obtainment of eggs and larvae of nematodes
Faeces were collected directly from the rectum of naturally infected sheep and free from previous chemical treatments at least 60 days.
Eggs per gram of faeces (EPG) was performed for selection ofanimals with EPG value above 2,000 eggs.
For eggs isolation for hatchability test, the methodology described by Coles et al. (1992) adapted by Bizimenyera et al. (2006) was used. Faeces were macerated in water at 40°C, sieved through sieves of 250, 150, 75 and 25 µm. After the material was centrifuged at 3000 revolutions for 5 min, the supernatant was discarded. This material was then transferred to Falcon tubes, filled with saturated NaCl solution suspending the eggs. After further centrifugation, the supernatant was again filtered on sieve of 25 µm and washed under the conditions described above. To obtain larvae coproculture was performed (Ueno and Gonçalves, 1998).
Anthelmintic evaluation
The hatchability test was carried out in quadruplicate (Von Samson-Himmelstjerna et al., 2009), evaluating the following treatments: ETM at concentrations of 0.625; 1.25; 2.5 and 5 mg mL-1, negative control (distilled water), positive control (albenzadol sulfoxide 0.25 mg mL-1 associated with dimethylsulfoxide - DMSO 0.75%) and DMSO control (distilled water with 0.75% DMSO).
To evaluate each treatment, 100 µL of the suspension water and eggs (with 110 eggs), and 400 µL of the respective treatments was added to the culture plates. The plates were incubated in biochemical oxygen demand oven (B.O.D.) at 27°C for 48 h. After, total count of eggs and first stage larvae (L1), was performed to obtain the hatchability percentage.
To perform the inhibition of larval migration test (Rabel et al., 1994) aqueous solution containing 150 third-stage larvae (L3) obtained by coproculture in 100 µL of solution was standardized. They were evaluated in quadruplicate, the same aforementioned treatments, except for the positive control treatment, which consisted of 0.01 mg mL-1 levamisole hydrochloride associated with 0.75% DMSO.
Microtubes containing 1 mL of the respective treatment solution and 100 µL of L3 were incubated in B.O.D. at 37°C for two hours, then centrifuged at 6000 revolutions per 3 min. 900 µL was removed and the volume remained as 200 µL.
For test preparation, 24 well culture plates were used, each with a filter opening of 25 µm. In each filter, 1800 µL of each treatment and the remaining 200 µL of the respective wells for each treatment were added.
Plates were again incubated in B.O.D. for two hours at 37°C and after the filters were removed for counting larvae migrated and were retained. Larvae were inactivated with Lugol 5% and the reading was conducted under an optical microscope with 40x magnification.
The migration percentage was calculated by the formula % migration = [Nm / (Nm + Nr)] x 100, where Nm is the number of L3 larvae migrate through the mesh and Nr is the number of larvae L3 retained in the mesh. In both tests, the averages were compared by Tukey test at 5% probability by the Statistica software (Stat Soft, 2007).
Determination of total polyphenols content, flavonoids and tannins of ETM
The ETM was diluted in the concentrations 0.25; 0.50; 1; 1.5; 2 and 3 mg mL-1 and evaluated in triplicate. For determination of total polyphenols, the method used was the Folin-Ciocalteu. The results were expressed in milligrams of gallic acid per gram of extract. Gallic acid is a precursor of several types of phenolic compounds has simple structure, which is considered standard substance (Stagos et al., 2012).
The dosage of total flavonoids was determined by UV-Vis spectrophotometer according to the methodology of Zhishen et al. (1999), based on the complexation of flavonoids with AlCl3. The results were expressed in milligrams of rutin per gram of extract.
The rutin and quercetin, shows the basic structure of flavonoids and can be used as an indirect indicator of flavonoids.
The determination of the content of tannins was according to the methodology of Makkar (1994) adapted by Fagbemi et al. (2005), and the results were expressed in milligrams of tannic acid per gram of dry extract.
Determination of antioxidant activity of ETM
The antioxidant activity of the extract was determined by the ability of H+ donor for the stable radical 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH), according to Blios (1958). The calculation of the antioxidant activity was performed according to the formula: Antioxidant activity (%) = [(Acontrol – Asample) / Acontrol] x 100, where Asample is the absorbance of the samples after 30 min and Acontrol is the absorbance of DPPH; both at 517 nm.
Subsequently, the antioxidant activity was also determined by the iron reduction method (FRAP test) according to Rufino et al. (2006) using solution Trolox 1000 µM as standard. Results were expressed in µM Trolox equivalent per gram of dry extract.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Through the EPG, trichostrongylids eggs were identified. It was possible to verify anthelmintic activity of ETM in inhibiting hatching and larval migration. The results corroborated with other researchers that reported inhibitory action of tanniferous plants on hatchability and migration larvae of nematodes in sheep (Bizimenyera et al., 2006; Maciel et al., 2006; Yoshihara et al., 2014) (Table 1).
For positive controls, albendazole sulfoxide 0.25 mg mL-1 showed 100% inhibition of hatching and levamisole hydrochloride 0.01 mg mL-1 showed 89% inhibition of larval migration. The control DMSO did not differ (p<0.05) from the negative control in hatchability test, but differed in migration test, showing inhibition of 9.60% in hatchability test and 7.14% in migration test.
The anthelmintic activity presented by ETM, probably was due to the condensed tannin content, which in the concentration 3 mg mL-1 reached 288.89 mg tannic acid equivalent per gram of extract (Table 2). However, higher concentrations of ETM (> 2.5 mg mL-1) did not differ from NC and DMSO in hatchability test. Thus, these results represent an important perspective for control of nematodes by the consumption of tanniferous plants.
Bizimenyera et al. (2006) reported a 100% inhibition of hatching of larvae of Trichostrongylus colubriformis with 25 mg mL-1 of extracts from different parts of Beltophorum africanum. Maciel et al. (2006) worked with the same plant at the same concentration and found that the ethanolic extract of the leaves inhibited 100% hatching larvae of Haemonchus contortus, while the hexane extract at the concentration 50 mg mL-1 inhibited only 16.92% of hatching. According to the authors, the mechanism of the anthelmintic action still had to be determined. However, it could be due to tannins, since the extracts with tannins removed exhibited slightly less activity than the crude extracts.
Alonso-Diaz et al. (2008) found that the four tanniferous plant extract (Acacia pennatula, Lysiloma latisiliquum, Piscidia piscipula and Leucaena leucocephala) in the concentrations 1.2 mg mL-1 inhibited 49.1 to 63.8% migration of larvae L3 of H. contortus. All four plant extracts interfered with the process of L3 exsheathment, which might be involved as a mechanism of action of tannins on H. contortus larvae. Yoshihara et al. (2014) required 100 mg mL-1 of a commercial extract of Acacia mearnsii for 97.1% inhibition of larval migration. In addition to the anthelmintic action, the extract caused ultrastructural changes in adult parasites H. contortus after contact in vitro and in vivo (Yoshihara et al., 2015). For flavonoids and tannins, the highest levels were found in the concentration of 3 mg mL-1. For polyphenols, concentrations with higher levels were 1; 1.5; 2 and 3 mg mL-1, which did not differ (Table 2).
ETM showed antioxidant activity (AA%) at all tested concentrations, reaching 38.71% at the concentration of 3 mg mL-1 (Table 3). The IC50% corresponds to 3.83 mg mL-1. For iron reduction test (FRAP), ETM reached 468.12 µM Trolox equivalent per gram of extract at the concentration of 3 mg mL-1.
According to Sun and Ho (2005), buckwheat presents an effective antioxidant activity as compared to the natural antioxidants, and natural antioxidants may have the potential to prevent lipid oxidation of food. Karamac (2010) found that the antioxidant activity of tannins fraction of phenolic compounds from buckwheat showed IC50% corresponding to 0.019 mg mL-1.
The author concluded that comparing the antioxidant activity of tannin fractions from buckwheat with the literature data concerning the antioxidant activity of fractions isolated from other plants, leads to the conclusion that buckwheat fractions are strong antioxidants. The highest values found by Karamac (2010) for the antioxidant activity of buckwheat in relation to this study were due to the different way of extraction. The author obtained the antioxidant activity of isolated fractions of tannins (from seeds and groats), whereas the present study showed the hydroalcoholic extract of ground seeds.
The primary antioxidants in the buckwheat are rutin, quercetin and hyperin, and the bran and husk have from 2 to 7 times more antioxidant activity than grasses such as oats, tricicale and barley (Morishita et al., 2007; Holasova et al., 2002; Zdunczyk et al., 2006). The antioxidant activity of methanol extracts to 80% in different cultures presented the following order, considering the highest to lowest: buckwheat, barley, oats, wheat, rye (Zielinski and Kozlowska, 2000). Considering the antioxidants in buckwheat, there may be benefits in using this crop in animal feed due to the fact that it reduces the production of free radicals and can help prevent lipid oxidation, which increases the shelf life of the meat (Lima Júnior et al., 2013).
Inglett et al. (2010 and 2011) evaluated antioxidant activity in buckwheat extracts with water, hydroalcoholic solution 50% ethanol and 100% ethanol, using microwave irradiation or water bath for 15 min at different temperatures (23 to 150°C). Regardless of the heat source, higher antioxidant activities was found in 100% ethanol extract at 100 and 150°C: 5.61 and 5.73 μmol Trolox equivalent per gram of extract, respectively.
Rutin is a useful bioflavonoid in the treatment of various medical conditions, mainly due to its antioxidant action (Karamac, 2010). Flavonoids may have antimicrobial activity due to the disruption and destruction of microbial membranes by forming complexes of the bacterial wall with soluble proteins (Soldera et al., 2010). This represents additional advantage considering the possibility of the occurrence of secondary bacterial infections to gastrointestinal parasites. Likewise, the antioxidant activity of flavonoids is important due to the control of the production of free radicals (Sousa et al., 2007). The highest concentration of rutin in buckwheat is found in the leaves and flowers (Vojtíšková et al., 2012).
At 51 days after sowing, Klein et al. (2010) found crude protein contents (CP) in a late and early cultivar of buckwheat to be, respectively 17.27% and 15%. These values are superior to commonly used fodder grasses. Italiano and Neto (2006) found 11.53% of CP in Andropogon, 10.58% in Tanzania and 9.15% in Tifton-85. Gorgen (2013) found in a buckwheat cultivar, crude protein levels at 47 and 57 days respectively, with 23.8 and 14.7%. Alencastro (2014) found in the cultivars tested at 50 and 70 days, 12.73 and 11.13% CP, respectively. The lower level is due to the fact that the advance of maturity of buckwheat causes reduction in crude protein, and the highest levels are observed in the vegetative stage, reducing after flowering. The result of the analysis of buckwheat forage is promising for animal feed, mainly for dairy cattle in the fall season with problem of lack of forage (Klein et al., 2010).
Additionally, buckwheat has a high content of lysine, an essential amino acid deficient in most cereals, demonstrating potential in animal feed (Joshi and Padora, 1991; Kunachowicz et al., 1996). Buckwheat can also act as functional forage manipulating ruminal fermentation and providing reduction in methane formation by 12% (Amelchanka et al., 2010; Leiber et al., 2012).
CONCLUSION
For the conditions evaluated in this study, it is concluded that anthelmintic and antioxidant activity, demonstrate the potential of ETM in parasitological control of sheep.
CONFLICT OF INTERESTS
The authors have not declared any conflict of interests.
REFERENCES
Alencastro RBG (2013). Produtividade e qualidade da forragem de trigo mourisco (Fagopyrum esculentum Möench L.) para a alimentação de ruminantes. Masters in Animal Sciences dissertation. Universidade de Brasília. Brazil 49 p. |
|
Alonso-Díaz MA, Torres-Acosta JFJ, Sandoval-Castro CA, Aguilar-Caballero AJ, Hoste H (2008). In vitro larval migration and kinetics of exsheathment of Haemonchus contortus larvae exposed to four tropical tanniniferous plant extracts. Vet. Parasitol. 153:313-319. |
|
Amelchanka SL, Kreuzer M, Leiber F (2010). Utility of buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum Moench) as feed: Effects of forage and grain on in vitro ruminal fermentation and performance of dairy cows. J. Anim. Feed Sci. 155:111-121. |
|
Batatinha MJM, Almeida GA, Domingues LF, Simas MMS, Botura MB, Guedes ACF, Almeida MAO (2011). Efeitos dos extratos aquoso e metanólico de algaroba sobre culturas de larvas de nematódeos gastrintestinais de caprinos. Ci. Anim. Bras. 12:514-519. |
|
Bizimenyera ES, Githiori JB, Eloff JN, Swan GE (2006). In vitro activity of Peltophorum africanum Sond. (Fabaceae) extracts on the egg hatching and larval development of the parasitic nematode Trichostrongylus colubriformis. Vet. Parasitol. 142:336-343. |
|
Blios MS (1958). Antioxidant determinations by the use of a stable free radical. Nature 26:1199-1200. |
|
Brunet S, Montellano CM, Torres-Acosta JF, Sandoval-Castro CA, Aguilar-Caballero AJ, Capetillo-Leal C, Hoste H (2008). Effect of the consumption of Lysiloma latisiliquum on the larval establishment of gastrointestinal nematodes in goats. Vet. Parasitol. 157:81-88. |
|
Coles GC, Bauer C., Botgsteede FHM, Geerts S., Klei TR, Taylor MA, Waller PJ (1992). World Association for the Advancement of Veterinary Parasitology (W.A.A.P.) methods for the detection of anthelmintic resistance in nematodes of veterinary importance. Vet. Parasitol. 44:35-44. |
|
De Zen S, Santos MC, Monteiro CM (2014). Evolução da caprino e ovinocultura. Ativos da Pecuária de Caprino e Ovinocultura 1p. |
|
Fagbemi TN, Oshodi AA, Ipinmoroti KO (2005). Processing effects on some antinutritional factors and in vitro multienzyme protein digestibility (IVPD) of three tropical seeds: breadnut (Artocarpus altilis), cashewnut (Anacardium occidentale) and fluted pumpkin (Telfairia occidentalis). Pak. J. Nutr. 4(4):250-256. |
|
FAO (2003). Resistencia a los antiparasitarios: estado actual con énfasis en América Latina. Rome: Food and Agr. Org. of the United Nations 51p. |
|
Gianlorenço VK (2013). Produção de carne ovina pode ser mais rentável que bovina. São Paulo: SEBRAE-SP. Avaliable at: |
|
Gorgen AV (2013). Produtividade e qualidade da forragem de milheto (Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R.BR) e de trigo mourisco (Fagopyrum esculentum Moench) cultivado no cerrado. Bachelor in Agronomy Monograph. Universidade de Brasília. Brazil 49 p. |
|
Güetter C (2011). Ovinocultura: atividade em ampla expansão. Cascavel: O Paraná. |
|
Holasova M, Fiedlerova V, Smrcinova H, Orsak M, Lachman J, Vavreinova S (2002). Buckwheat – the source of antioxidant activity in functional foods. Food Res. Int. 35:207-211. |
|
Hoste H, Torres-Acosta JFJ (2011). Non chemical control of helminths in ruminants: adapting solutions for changing worms in a changing world. Vet. Parasitol. 180:144-154. |
|
Houdijk JGM, Kyriazakis I, Kidane A (2012). Manipulating small ruminant parasite epidemiology through the combination of nutritional strategies. Vet. Parasitol. 186:38-50. |
|
Igarashi M, Carvalho DMG, Bucci FM, Miranda Y, Rodrigues ZM, Almeida MCF, Piona MNM (2013). Efeito do neem (Azadirachta indica) no controle de nematódeos gastrintestinais em ovinos suplementados a pasto no período seco. Semina: Ciênc. Agric. 34:301-310. |
|
Inglett GE, Rose DJ, Chen D, Stevenson DG, Biswas A (2010). Phenolic content and antioxidant activity of extracts from whole buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum Moench) with or without microwave irradiation. Food Chem. 119:1216-1219. |
|
Inglett GE, Chen D, Berhow M, Lee S (2011). Antioxidant activity of commercial buckwheat flours and their free and bound phenolic compositions. Food Chem. 125:923-929. |
|
Italiano EC, Araújo Neto RB (2006). Desempenho produtivo de ovinos em pastagem cultivada. Embrapa: Circular Técnica 42pp. |
|
Joshi BD, Padora RS (1991). Buckwheat in India. Phagli: National Bureau of Plant Gen. Res. Reg. Station 16:7-11. |
|
Joshi BR, Kommuru DS, Terrill TH, Mosjidis JA, Burke JM, Shakya KP, Miller JE (2011). Effect of feeding Sericea lespedeza leaf meal in goats experimentally infected with Haemonchus contortus. Vet. Parasitol. 178:192-197. |
|
Kaplan RM (2004). Drug resistance in nematodes of veterinary importance: a status report. Trends Parasitol. 20:477-481. |
|
Karamac´ M (2010). Antioxidant Activity of Tannin Fractions Isolated from Buckwheat Seeds and Groats. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 87:559-566. |
|
Ketzis JK, Vercruysse J, Stromberg BE, Larsen M, Athanasiadou S, Houdijk JG (2006). Evaluation of efficacy expectations for novel and non-chemical helminth control strategies in ruminants. Vet. Parasitol. 139:321-335. |
|
Klein VA, Navarini LL, Baseggio M, Madalosso T, Costa LO (2010). Trigo mourisco: uma planta de triplo propósito e uma opção para rotação de culturas em áreas sob plantio direto. Rev. Plantio Direto 117pp. |
|
Kunachowicz H, Nadolna I, Klys W, Iwanow K, Rutkowska U (1996). Evaluation of the nutritive value of some gluten-free products. Zywienie Czlowieka i Metabolizm, Warszawa 23:99-109. |
|
Leiber F, Kunz C, Kreuzer M (2012). Influence of different morphological parts of buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum) and its major secondary metabolite rutin on rumen fermentation in vitro. Czech J. Anim. Sci. 57(1):10-18. |
|
Lima Júnior DM, Rangel AHN, Urbano SA, Moreno GMB (2013). Oxidação lipídica e qualidade ca carne ovina. Acta. Vet. Bras. 7(1):14-28. |
|
Maciel MV, Morais SM, Bevilaqua CML, Camurça-Vasconcelos ALF, Costa CTC, Castro CMS (2006). Ovicidal and larvicidal activity of Melia Azedarach extracts on Haemonchus contortus. Vet. Parasitol. 140:98-104. |
|
Madruga AM, Chagas RA, Bianchini BD, Santos PM, Lopes PRS, Corrêa GF (2015). Avaliação da eficácia de anti-helmínticos e da resistência parasitária em ovinos - resultados preliminares. In: Anais do VII Salão Internacional de Ensino, Pesquisa e Extensão – Universidade Federal do Pampa. Alegrete: Online annals. Avaliable at: |
|
Makkar HPS (1994). Quantification of tannins: A laboratory manual. Aleppo: Int. Centre for Agri. Res. in the Dry Area (ARDA). |
|
Max RA, Kassuku AA, Kimambo AE, Mantega LA, Wakelin D, Buttery PJ (2009). The effect of wattle tannin drenches on gastrointestinal nematodes of tropical sheep and goats during experimental and natural infections. J. Agric. Sci. 147:211-218. |
|
Minho AP, Bueno ICS, Louvandini H, Jackson F, Gennari SM, Abdalla AL (2008). Effect of Acacia molissima tannin extract on the control of gastrointestinal parasites in sheep. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 147:172-181. |
|
Morishita T, Yamaguchi H, Degi K (2007). The contribution of polyphenols to antioxidative activity in common buckwheat and tartary buckwheat grain. Plant Prod. Sci. 10:99-104. |
|
Mupeyo B, Barry TN, Pomroy WE, Ramírez-Restrepo CA, López-Villalobos N, Pernathner A (2011). Effects of feeding willow (Salix spp.) upon death of established parasites and parasite fecundity. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 164:8-20. |
|
Neves DAL, Soares JPG, Carvalho JM (2016). Produção de carne bovina orgânica: uma avaliação dos impactos socioeconômicos na região do pantanal do Brasil. Rev. em Agroneg. e Meio Ambient. 9(1):71-92. |
|
Oliveira LMB, Bevilaqua CML, Morais SM, Camurça-Vasconcelos ALF, Macedo ITF (2011). Plantas taniníferas e o controle de nematóides gastrintestinais de pequenos ruminantes. Ciência Rural 41(11):1967-1974. |
|
Otero MJ, Hidalgo LG (2004). Taninos condensados en especies forrajeras de clima templado: efectos sobre la productividad de rumiantes afectados por parasitosis gastrointestinales (una revisión). Livestock Res. Rural Dev. P 16. |
|
Rabel B, McGregor R, Douch PG (1994). Improved bioassay for estimation of inhibitory effects of ovine gastrointestinal mucus and anthelmintics on nematode larval migration. Int. J. Parasitol. 24(5):671-676. |
|
Resende FD (2013). Produção de carne orgânica. Ver. Casa da Agr. 16(1):25-26. |
|
Rosalinski-Moraes F, Moretto LH, Bresolin WS, Gabrielli I, Kafer L, Zanchet IK, Sonaglio F, Thomaz-Soccol V (2007). Resistência anti-helmíntica em rebanhos ovinos da região da associação dos municípios do Alto Irani (Amai), oeste de Santa Catarina. Cienc. Anim. Bras. 8:559-565. |
|
Rufino MSM, Alves RE, Brito ES, Morais SM, Sampaio CG, Pérez-Jiménez J, Saura-Calixto FG (2006). Metodologia científica: determinação da atividade antioxidante total em frutas pelo método de redução do ferro (FRAP). Embrapa: Comunicado Técnico on line 125. |
|
Sczesny-Moraes EA, Bianchin I, Silva KF, Catto JB, Honer MR, Paiva F (2010). Resistência anti-helmíntica de nematoides gastrintestinais em ovinos, Mato Grosso do Sul. Pesqui. Vet. Bras. 30:229-236. |
|
Soccol VT, Pohl-de-Souza F (1997). Contribuição para o estudo da resistência dos helmintos gastrointestinais de ovinos (Ovis aries) aos anti-helminticos, no Estado do Paraná. Rev. Bras. Parasitol. Vet. 6:217. |
|
Soldera CC, Zanella GN, Frasson APZ (2010). Avaliação da atividade antibacteriana de Croton urucurana. Rev. Contexto Saúde 10:25-31. |
|
Sousa CMM, SILVA HR, Vieira-Júnior, GM, Ayres MCC, Costa CLS, Araújo DS, Cavalcante LCD, Barros EDS, Araújo PBM, Brandão MS, Chaves MH (2007). Fenóis totais e atividade antioxidante de cinco plantas medicinais. Quím. Nova 30:351-355. |
|
Stagos D, Portesis N, Spanou C, Mossialos D, Aligiannis N, Chaita E, Panagoulis C, RERI E, Skaltsounis L, Tsatsakis AM, Kouretas D (2012). Correlation of total polyphenolic content with antioxidant and antibacterial activity of 24 extracts from Greek domestic Lamiaceae species. Food Chem. Toxicol. 50:4115-4124. |
|
Stat Soft (2007).Statistica 8.0. Oklahoma. |
|
Steadman KJ, Burgoon MS, Lewis BA, Edwardson SE, Obendorf RL (2001). Minerals, phytic acid, tannin and rutin in buckwheat seed milling fractions. J. of Sci. of Food and Agric. 81:1094-1100. |
|
Sun T, HO CT (2005). Antioxidant activities of buckwheat extracts. Food Chem. 90:743–749. |
|
Szpatowski JM (2010). Verminoses causam grandes prejuízos ao produtor. Rio de Janeiro: Portal Dia de Campo. Avaliable at: View. Acesso em 13 fev. 2014. |
|
Ueno H, Gonçalves PC (1998). Manual para diagnóstico das helmintoses de ruminantes 4ª ed. Tokyo: Japan Internacional Cooperation Agency 149p. |
|
Veloso CFM, Louvandini H, Kimura EA, Azevedo CR, Enoki DR, França LD, McManus CM, Dell'Porto A, Santana AP (2004). Efeitos da suplementação proteica no controle da verminose e nas características de carcaça de ovinos Santa Inês. Ciên. Anim. Bras. 5(3):131-139. |
|
Vieira LS, Berne MEA, Cavalcante ACR, Costa CAF (1992). Haemonchus contortus resistance to ivermectin and netobimin in Brazilian sheep. Vet. Parasitol. 45:111-116. |
|
Vieira LS (2008). Métodos alternativos de controle de nematoides gastrointestinais em caprinos e ovinos. Tecnol. Ciênc. Agropec. 2(2):49-56. |
|
Vila Nova LE, Costa ME, Melo PGCF, Cunha Filho LFC, Barca Júnior FA, Silva LC, Okano W, Bogado ALG (2014). Resistência de nematoides aos anti-helmínticos nitroxinil 34% e ivermectina 1% em rebanho ovino no município de São João do Ivaí, Paraná. Rev. Bras. Hig. Sanidade Anim. 8(1):160-171. |
|
Vojtíšková P, Kmentová K, Kubáň V, KráÄmar S (2012). Chemical composition of buckwheat plant (Fagopyrum esculentum) and selected buckwheat products. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. Food Sci. 1:1011-1019. |
|
Von Samson-Himmelstjerna G, Coles GC, Jackson F (2009). Standization of egg hatch test for the detection of benzimidazole resistance in parasitic nematodes. Parasitol. Res. 105:825-834. |
|
Yoshihara E, Minho AP, Cardim ST, Tabacow VBD, Yamamura MH (2014). In vitro ovicidal and larvicidal activity of condensed tannins on gastrointestinal nematode infestations in sheep (Ovis aries). Semina: Ciênc. Agric. 35(6):3173-3180. |
|
Yoshihara E, Minho AP, Tabacow VBD, Cardim ST, Yamamura MH (2015). Ultrastructural changes in the Haemonchus contortus cuticle exposed to Acacia mearnsii extract. Semina: Ciênc. Agric. 36(6):3763-3768. |
|
Zdunczyk Z, Flis M, Zielinski H, Wroblewska M, Antoszkiewicz Z, Juskiewicz J (2006). In vitro antioxidant activities of barley, husked oat, naked oat, triticale, and buckwheat wastes and their influence on the growth and biomarkers of antioxidant status in rats. J. Agric. Food Chem. 54:4168-4175. |
|
Zhishen J, Mengcheng T, Jianming W (1999). The determination of flavonoid contents in mulberry and their scavenging effects on superoxide radicals. Food Chem. 64:555-559. |
|
Zhou ML, Bai DQ, Tang Y, Zhu XM, Shao JR (2012). Genetic diversity of four new species related to southwestern Sichuan buckwheats as revealed by karyotype, ISSR and allozyme characterization. Plant Syst. Evol. 298:751-759. |
|
Zielinski H, Kozlowska H (2000). Antioxidant activity and total phenolics in selected cereal grains and their different morphological fractions. J. Agric. Food Chem. 48:2008-2016. |
Copyright © 2024 Author(s) retain the copyright of this article.
This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0