Full Length Research Paper
ABSTRACT
Lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) is a vegetable of higher consumption and economic value in Brazil. Due of the sensitivity of the leaves, the wind can bring losses to the perfect harmony of growth and physiological development the plant. Wind can also cause irreversible mechanical damage, such as senescence, burning, breaking, fall leaves and tear. The city of Cascavel in western Paraná is at an average altitude of 760 m enabling the continuous occurrence of strong winds. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of this meteorological variable in the production of lettuce and water evapotranspiration phenomenon with plants. Wind were made ducts with fans who had average wind speeds of 0, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10 km/h, positioned at 2 m of plants in greenhouses. The evapotranspiration was verified by a evaporimeter installed in each wind duct for three sunny days, rainy and cloudy. After 49 days, they were taken and analyzed the height of plants and roots, number of leaves, fresh and dry mass of leaves and roots. It was found that the increase in wind speed also increases the evaporation, however, other environmental factors influence this parameter and the production decreases, as we increase the wind speed.
Key words: Greenhouse, evapotranspiration, Lactuca sativa L., wind.
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Figure 1 shown the contents of average daily evapotranspiration, on sunny days, rain and cloudy for each wind speed used in the ducts. It was found that the evaporation is larger as the wind speed increases. The typical of evapotranspiration values ​​in Western Rio Grande do Sul region is 6 to 7 mm/day in sunny days and 4 to 5 mm/day in days rainy, differing from those obtained that were between 2.123 and 11.818 mm/day on sunny days and 0.557 mm and 1.337 mm/day on rainy days (Tabbal et al., 2002).
Figure 2 shows the values of minimum and maximum temperature and the maximum and minimum relative humidity collected. It was observed that the average temperature during the experiment was 20.37°C, however, there is a large variation in temperature of the region, and days 35.4°C with maximum temperature only 0.9°C minimum temperature, testifying to the measurements made by Iapar (2011).
The average relative humidity during the trial period was 65.51%, but with wide variations, with a minimum of 28% and a maximum of 94%, confirming Amorim et al. (2001) who obtained the average relative humidity 75 to 81%.
It showed that rainy days have a higher relative humidity and consequently, low evaporation. In contrast, the sunny days have a high evapotranspiration and lower relative humidity. The microclimatic behavior of rainy and cloudy days were similar, however, the sunny days showed high amplitude variation in temperature, relative humidity and evaporation.
The results of the samples taken are shown in Table 1. It was found that strong winds cause a deficit in the production of lettuce, having damage and reducing the amount of fresh dough, so the leaves, the roots.
Thus, it is seen that strong winds cause a deficit in the production of lettuce crop, or increased as the wind speed, the plants showed damage to leaves by reducing the amount of fresh mass, so the leaves, the roots. In winds of 10 km/h only remaining 2 plants, and fresh mass of leaves average was only 2.46 g. Campbell-Clause (1994) evaluated the effect of the winds in grape cultivars Rubi and Italy, using windbreaks, with permeability of 40% and height around 4 m, arranged perpendicular to the direction of the winds, in Western Australia and obtained a productivity and fresh pasta grape of up to 23% compared to the control that did not use the windbreak, corroborating the data obtained in the experiment and noting that, for different cultures, the winds are harmful.
CONCLUSION
CONFLICT OF INTERESTS
REFERENCES
Amorim RCF, Ricieri RP, Son JSV, Amorim RFC, Di Pace LT, Second GHC, Milk CC (2001). Probability of maximum temperature, minimum and average air for corn in Cascavel, western Paraná. Proceedings XII Brazilian Congress of Agrometeorology / III Latin American Meeting of Agrometeorology, Fortaleza - CE, 2001. |
|
Campbell-Clause J (1994). The effect of wind on table grape production. International Symposium on table grape production. Davis Am. Soc. Enol. Viticult. pp. 171-174. |
|
CEAGESP (2013). (Warehouse Center and Storage General of the State of São Paulo). Lettuce rating. São Paulo, 2013. Access 18 mai 2015. Online. Addtional in <http://www.ceagesp.gov.br>. |
|
Coutts MP, Walker C, Bumand AC (1990). Effects of establishment method on root form of Lodgepole pine and Sitka spruce and on the production of adventitious roots. Fac. For. Univ. Toronto 63(2):143-159. |
|
Fayle DCF (1976). Radial growth in tree roots. Technical report no. 9. Faculty of Forestry, University of Toronto. P 183. |
|
Feltrim AL, Cecílio Filho AB, Branco RBF, Barbosa JC, Salatiel LT (2005). Iceberg lettuce production in soil and in hydroponics, in winter and summer in Jaboticabal, SP., Campina Grande, PB. J. Agric. Environ. Eng. 9(4):505-509. |
|
Filgueira FAR (1982). Cichoriáreas: Lettuce, chicory and endive. In: horticulture Guide: Culture and marketing of vegetable. 2nd Ed Sao Paulo: Agron. Ceres 2(3):77-93. |
|
IAPAR Agronomic Institute of Paraná. (2011). Historical averages in IAPAR stations. Acesso: 06 May 2015. Online. |
|
Jackson L, Mayberry K, Laemmlen F, Koike S, Schulbach K, Chaney W (1996). Iceberg lettuce production in California, 1996. Accessed on: 16 may. 2015. Online. Available in: http://www.agmrc.org/media/cms/7215_9E0CF0CBDF80E.pdf. |
|
Lisbão RS Nagai H, Trani PE (1990). Alface. In: INSTITUTO AGRONÔMICO DE CAMPINAS. Instruções agrícolas para o Estado de São Paulo. 5.ed. Campinas pp. 11-12. (Boletim, 200). |
|
Maroto-Borrego JV (1983). Horticulture: Special herbaceous, 2nd Ed, Madrid: Mundi-Prensa, P 590. |
|
Pereira AR, Angelocci LR, Sentelhas PC (2007). Agricultural Meteorology. Piracicaba, College of Agriculture "Luiz de Queiroz" – USP. P 25. |
|
Resende FV, Saminêz TCO, Vidal MC, Souza RB, Clemente FM (2007). Cultivation of lettuce in an organic system, EMBRAPA, Brasília, Nov. 2007. |
|
Resende SAA, Resende Junior JC (2011). Interference of the winds in the cultivation of plants: Harmful effects and preventive practices, Encyclopedia Biosphere Scientific Centre Know, Goiânia 7(12):1. |
|
Sganzerla E (1990). The fascinating art of growing with plastics, New Agriculture, 2nd Ed, Porto Alegre, Triunfo, p. 303, Accessed on: 19 may. 2015. Online. |
|
Silva FAS (2014). ASSISTAT: Version 7.7 beta. DEAG-CTRN-UFCG - Updated April 1, 2014. Accessed: 19 May. 2015. |
|
Silva WCM, Ricieri RP, Souza JL, Ribeiro A (2007). agro-climatic characterization of Cascavel - Paraná for corn, Ceres Mag. 54:341-348. |
|
Sonnenberg PE (1985). Vegetable Crops special. 5. Ed. Goiânia, UFGO, 1:187. |
|
Tabbal DF, Bouman BAM, Bhuiyan SI, Sibayan EB, Sattar MA (2002). On-farm strategies for reducing water input irrigated rice: Case studies in the Philippines. Agricultural water management, Amsterdam. 56(2):93-113. |
|
Telewski FW (1993). Wind induced physiological and developmental responses in trees. In: Wind and wind-related damage to trees. (Eds. J. Grace & M.P. Coutts). Proceedings of the IUFRO conference, July 1993. |
|
Tubelis A, Birth FJL (1980). descriptive Weather: Brazilian fundamentals and applications. Sao Paulo: Nobel Bookstore, P 374. |
|
Vescove HV, Turco JEP (2005). Comparison of three methods of estimation of reference evapotranspiration for the region of Araraquara. - SP, J. Agric. Eng. Jaboticabal 25(3):713-721. |
Copyright © 2025 Author(s) retain the copyright of this article.
This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0