African Journal of
Biotechnology

  • Abbreviation: Afr. J. Biotechnol.
  • Language: English
  • ISSN: 1684-5315
  • DOI: 10.5897/AJB
  • Start Year: 2002
  • Published Articles: 12481

Full Length Research Paper

Effect of controlled and uncontrolled cooling rate on motility parameters of cryopreserved ram spermatozoa

Iraj Ashrafi1*, Hamid Kohram2,3,  Hamid Naijian2, Mehdi Poorhamdollah2 and Hamid Mirzakhani4
1Young Researchers Club, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran. 2Department of Animal Science, Faculty College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran. 3Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Shahid Chamran University, Ahvaz, Iran. 4Animal Breeding Center of  IRAN (A.I LAB).
Email: [email protected]

  •  Accepted: 06 June 2011
  •  Published: 15 August 2011

Abstract

Ram spermatozoa are sensitive to extreme changes in temperature during the freeze-thaw process. The aim of this study was to determine the effects of two cooling method (controlled-rate and uncontrolled-rate) on pre-freezing and post-thaw sperm motility parameters. Ejaculates were collected using the artificial vagina from four Chal rams and diluted with a Tris-based extender and packed in 0.25 ml straws. Then, the sample was processed according to the two methods; method 1: straws were cooled from 37 to 5°C, at a liner rate of -0.3°C/min in a controlled-rate cooling machine (custom-built) and equilibrated at 5°C for 80 min and then were frozen at the rate of -0.3°C/min from 5 to -10 and -25°C from -10 to -150°C and plunged into liquid nitrogen for storage; method 2: straws were transferred to a refrigerator and maintained at 5°C for 3 h, then, the straws were frozen in liquid nitrogen vapor 4 cm above the liquid nitrogen, for 15 min and plunged into liquid nitrogen. A computer-assisted sperm motility analysis was used to analyze sperm motion characteristics. The controlled rate of freezing (method 1) significantly improved the pre-freezing and post-thaw total and progressive motility compared with the uncontrolled rate (method 2). In specific kinetic parameters, method 1 gave significantly higher value for straight linear velocity (VSL) and curvilinear velocity (VCL) in comparison with method 2. There were no significant differences between the two methods for average path velocity (VAP) and linearity (LIN). In conclusion, the controlled rate of cooling conferred better cryopreserving ability to ram spermatozoa compared with the uncontrolled rate of cooling prior to programmable freezing.

 

Key words: Controlled cooling rate, uncontrolled cooling rate, motility parameters, ram spermatozoa.