Full Length Research Paper
References
|
Albanese MA, Mitchell S (1993). Problem-based learning: A review of literature on its outcomes and implementation issues. Acad. Med. 68(1):52-81. |
|
|
Aleksić D, ÄŒerne M, Dysvik A, Škerlavaj M (2016). I want to be creative, but … preference for creativity, perceived clear outcome goals, work enjoyment, and creative performance. Eur. J. Work Organ. Psychol. 25(3):363-383. |
|
|
Amabile TM (1992). Social environments that kill creativity. In S. S. Gryskiewicz & D. A. Hills (Eds.), Readings in Innovation. Greensboro, NC: Center for Creative Leadership. |
|
|
Amabile TM, Conti R, Coon H, Lazenby J, Herron M (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. Acad. Manage. J. 39(5):1154-1184. |
|
|
Armstrong AC (2005). Group flow in small groups of middle school mathematics students. University of British Columbia. |
|
|
Armstrong AC (2008). The fragility of group flow: The experiences of two small groups in a middle school mathematics classroom. J. Mathe. Behav. 27(2):101-115. |
|
|
Aubé C, Brunelle E, Rousseau V (2014). Flow experience and team performance: The role of team goal commitment and information exchange. Motivation Emotion, 38(1):120-130. |
|
|
Baker FA, MacDonald RAR (2013). Flow, identity, achievement, satisfaction and ownership during therapeutic songwriting experiences with university students and retirees. Musicae Scientiae, 17(2):131-146. |
|
|
Bakker AB, Schaufeli WB, Sixma HJ, Bosveld W, Van Dierendonck D (2000). Patient demands, lack of reciprocity, and burnout: A five-year longitudinal study among general practitioners. J. Organ. Behav. 21(4):425-441. |
|
|
Bedwell WL, Wildman JL, DiazGranados D, Salazar M, Kramer WS, Salas E (2012). Collaboration at work: An integrative multilevel conceptualization. Hum. Resourc. Manage. Rev. 22(2):128–145. |
|
|
Bennis WG, Biederman PW (1997). Organizing genius. Cambridge, MA: Perseus Books. |
|
|
Chang JW, Huang DW, Choi JN (2012). Is task autonomy beneficial for creativity? Prior task experience and self-control as boundary conditions. Soc. Behav. Personality 40(5):705-724. |
|
|
Chemi T (2016). The Experience of Flow in Artistic Creation. In Flow Experience (pp. 37–50). Springer, Cham. |
|
|
Cohen J, Jones WM, Smith S, Calandra B (2017). Makification: Towards a Framework for Leveraging the Maker Movement in Formal Education. J. Educ. Multimedia Hypermedia, 26(3):217-229. |
|
|
Cseh GM, Phillips LH, Pearson DG (2016). Mental and perceptual feedback in the development of creative flow. Consciousness and Cognition, 42(Supplement C):150-161. |
|
|
Csikszentmihályi M (1975). Beyond boredom and anxiety. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. |
|
|
Csikszentmihályi M (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York, NY: Harper Perennial. |
|
|
Csikszentmihályi M (2000). Beyond boredom and anxiety. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. |
|
|
Custodero LA (2012). The call to create: Flow experience in music learning and teaching. In D. Hargreaves, D. Miell, & R. MacDonald (Eds.), Musical Imaginations: Multidisciplinary Perspectives on Creativity, Performance and Perception. OUP Oxford. |
|
|
Deci EL, Spiegel NH, Ryan RM, Koestner R, Kauffman M (1982). Effects of performance standards on teaching styles: Behavior of controlling teachers. J. Educ. Psychol. 74(6):852-859. |
|
|
Fave Delle A, Bassi M (2016). Flow and Psychological Selection. In Flow Experience. Springer Cham. pp. 3-19. |
|
|
Duncker K (1926). A qualitative (experimental and theoretical) study of productive thinking (solving of comprehensible problems). Pedagogical Seminary J. Genetic Psychol. 33(4):642-708. |
|
|
Egbert J (2004). A study of flow theory in the foreign language classroom. Canadian Modern Language Rev. 60(5):549-586. |
|
|
Eisenberger R, Jones JR, Stinglhamber F, Shanock L, Randall AT (2005). Flow experiences at work: For high need achievers alone? J. Organ. Behav. 26(7):755-775. |
|
|
Eteläpelto A, Lahti J (2008). The resources and obstacles of creative collaboration in a long-term learning community. Thinking Skills |
|
|
Creativity, 3(3):226-240. |
|
|
Flink C, Boggiano AK, Barrett M (1990). Controlling teaching strategies: Undermining children's self-determination and performance. J. Personality Soc. Psychol. 59(5):916-924. |
|
|
Fullagar CJ, Kelloway EK (2009). Flow at work: An experience sampling approach. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 82(3):595-615. |
|
|
Fullagar C, Delle Fave A (2017). Flow at Work: Measurement and Implications. London: Taylor & Francis. |
|
|
Gaggioli A, Milani L, Mazzoni E, Riva G (2011). Networked Flow: A Framework for Understanding the Dynamics of Creative Collaboration in Educational and Training Settings. Open Educ. J. 4(1). |
|
|
Ghani JA, Deshpande SP (1994). Task characteristics and the experience of optimal flow in human-computer interaction. J. Psychol. 128(4):381-391. |
|
|
Glăveanu VP (2011). How are we creative together? Comparing sociocognitive and sociocultural answers. Theory Psychol. 21(4):473-492. |
|
|
Gloor PA, Almozlino A, Inbar O, Lo W, Provost S (2014). Measuring Team Creativity Through Longitudinal Social Signals. arXiv:1407.0440 [physics]. |
|
|
Gloor PA, Fuehres H, Fischbach K (2016). Only Say Something When You Have Something to Say: Identifying Creatives Through Their Communication Patterns. In Designing Networks for Innovation and Improvisation. Springer, Cham. pp. 65-75. Retrieved from |
|
|
Hamari J, Shernoff DJ, Rowe E, Coller B, Asbell-Clarke J, Edwards T (2016). Challenging games help students learn: An empirical study on engagement, flow and immersion in game-based learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 54(Supplement C):170-179. |
|
|
Hetland L (2013). Studio thinking 2: The real benefits of visual arts education (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Teachers College Press. |
|
|
Hirst G, Knippenberg DV, Zhou J (2009). A cross-level perspective on employee creativity: Goal orientation, team learning behavior, and individual creativity. Acad. Manage. J. 52(2):280-293. |
|
|
Hong HY, Chang YH, Chai CS (2014). Fostering a collaborative and creative climate in a college class through idea-centered knowledge-building. Instructional Sci. 42(3):389-407. |
|
|
Jang H, Reeve J, Deci EL (2010). Engaging students in learning activities: It is not autonomy support or structure but autonomy support and structure. J. Educ. Psychol. 102(3):588-600. |
|
|
Jackson SA, Eklund RC (2002). Assessing Flow in Physical Activity: The Flow State Scale–2 and Dispositional Flow Scale–2. J. Sport and Exercise Psychol. 24(2):133-150. |
|
|
Jin SAA (2012). "Toward integrative models of flow": Effects of performance, skill, challenge, playfulness, and presence on flow in video games. J. Broadcasting Electronic Media, 56(2):169-186. |
|
|
Kavadia S, Sommer SC (2009). The Effects of Problem Structure and Team Diversity on Brainstorming Effectiveness. Management Science, 55(12):1899-1913. |
|
|
Kotler S, Wheal J (2015). The 4 secrets to seahawks NFC success and how they can be applied to business. Forbes.com. Retrieved January 26, 2015, from |
|
|
Løvoll HS, Vittersø J (2014). Can Balance be Boring? A Critique of the "Challenges Should Match Skills" Hypotheses in Flow Theory. Soc. Indicators Res. 115(1):117-136. |
|
|
Massimini F, Delle Fave A (2000). Individual development in a bio-cultural perspective. Am. Psychol. 55(1):24-33. |
|
|
Miranda SM, Saunders C (1995). Group support systems: An organization development intervention to combat groupthink. Public Admin. Q. 19(2):193-216. |
|
|
Moneta GB (2012). Opportunity for creativity in the job as a moderator of the relation between trait intrinsic motivation and flow in work. Motivation Emotion, 36(4):491-503. |
|
|
Moneta GB (2012b). On the Measurement and Conceptualization of Flow. In Advances in Flow Research. Springer, New York, NY. pp. 23-50. |
|
|
Muis KR, Ranellucci J, Trevors G, Duffy MC (2015). The effects of technology-mediated immediate feedback on kindergarten students' attitudes, emotions, engagement and learning outcomes during literacy skills development. Learning Instruction, 38(Supplement C):1-13. |
|
|
Nakamura J, Csikszentmihályi M (2009). Flow theory and research. In C. R. Snyder & S. J. Lopez, Oxford handbook of positive psychology. Oxford, NY: Oxford University Press. pp. 195-206. |
|
|
Nokes-Malach TJ, Meade ML, Morrow DG (2012). The effect of expertise on collaborative problem solving. Thinking Reasoning, 18(1):32-58. |
|
|
Noy L, Levit-Binun N, Golland Y (2015). Being in the zone: physiological markers of togetherness in joint improvisation. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9. |
|
|
Partington S, Partington E, Olivier S (2009). The Dark Side of Flow: A Qualitative Study of Dependence in Big Wave Surfing. Sport Psychol. 23(2):170-185. |
|
|
Paton E (2012). When the book takes over: Creativity, the writing process and flow in Australian fiction writing. Int. J. Creativity Problem Solving, 22(1):61-76. |
|
|
Paulus PB, Dzindolet MT, Poletes G, Camacho LM (1993). Perception of performance in group brainstorming: The illusion of group productivity. Personality Soc. Psychol. Bull. 19(1):78-89. |
|
|
Paulus PB, Dzindolet M, Kohn NW (2012). Collaborative creativity-Group creativity and team innovation. In M. Mumford (Ed.) Handbook of organizational creativity (pp. 327-357). London, England: Academic Press. |
|
|
Paulus PB, Nijstad B (2003). Group creativity: Innovation through collaboration. Oxford, NY: Oxford University Press. Retrieved from |
|
|
Paulus PB, Larey TS, Ortega AH (1995). Performance and perceptions of brainstormers in an organizational setting. Basic Appl. Soc. Psychol. 17(1-2):249-265. |
|
|
Peppler KA, Solomou M (2011). Building creativity: collaborative learning and creativity in social media environments. On the Horizon, 19(1):13-23. |
|
|
Pritchard RD, Jones SD, Roth PL, Stuebing KK, Ekeberg SE (1988). Effects of group feedback, goal setting, and incentives on organizational productivity. J. Appl. Psychol. 73(2):337-358. |
|
|
Raffaelli Q, Mills C, Christoff K (2017). The knowns and unknowns of boredom: a review of the literature. Experimental Brain Research, 1-12. |
|
|
Reeve J, Bolt E, Cai Y (1999). Autonomy-supportive teachers: How they teach and motivate students. J. Educ. Psychol. 91(3):537-548. |
|
|
Reeve J, Jang H (2006). What teachers say and do to support students' autonomy during a learning activity. J. Educ. Psychol. 98(1):209-218. |
|
|
Roth G, Assor A, Kanat-Maymon Y, Kaplan H (2007). Autonomous motivation for teaching: How self-determined teaching may lead to self-determined learning. J. Educ. Psychol. 99(4):761-774. |
|
|
Runco MA (2004). Creativity. Annual Rev. Psychol. 55(1):657-687. |
|
|
Salanova M, Bakker AB, Llorens, S (2006). Flow at work: Evidence for an upward spiral of personal and organizational resources. J. Happiness Stud. 7(1):1-22. |
|
|
Salanova M, Rodríguez-Sánchez AM, Schaufeli WB, Cifre E (2014). Flowing together: A longitudinal study of collective efficacy and collective flow among workgroups. J. Psychol. 148(4):435-455. |
|
|
Sawyer K (2003). Group creativity: Music, theater, collaboration. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. |
|
|
Sawyer K (2007). Group genius: The creative power of collaboration. New York, NY: Basic Books. |
|
|
Sheehan DP, Katz L (2012). The practical and theoretical implications of flow theory and intrinsic motivation in designing and implementing exergaming in the school environment. Loading..., 6(9). |
|
|
Shernoff DJ, Csikszentmihalyi M, Schneider B, Shernoff ES (2003). Student Engagement in High School Classrooms from the Perspective of Flow Theory. School Psychol. Q. 18(2):158-76. |
|
|
Steiner E (1978). Group processes. New York, NY: Academic Press. |
|
|
Thimot S (2016). Teams, Trust, and Social Flow: A Grounded Theory Exploration. Royal Roads University, Canada. |
|
|
van Loon AM, Ros A, Martens R (2012). Motivated learning with digital learning tasks: What about autonomy and structure? Educ. Technol. Res. Devel. 60(6):1015-1032. |
|
|
Velikovsky J (2014). Flow Theory, Evolution & Creativity: Or, "Fun & Games." In Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Interactive Entertainment (p. 23:1–23:10). New York, NY, USA: ACM. |
|
|
Vollmeyer R, Rheinberg F (2006). Motivational effects on self-regulated learning with different tasks. Educ. Psychol. Rev. 18(3):239-253. |
|
|
Vroom VH, Yetton PW (1973). Leadership and decision-making (Vol. 110). University of Pittsburgh Press. |
|
|
Walker CJ (2010). Experiencing flow: Is doing it together better than doing it alone? J. Positive Psychol. 5(1):3-11. |
|
|
Wegner DM (1987). Transactive memory. In B. Mullen & G. R. Goethals (Eds.), Theories of group behavior (pp. 185–208). New York, NY: Springer-Verlag. |
|
|
Weick KE, Roberts KH (1993). Collective mind in organizations: Heedful interrelating on flight decks. Adm. Sci. Q. 38(3):357-381. |
|
|
Weldon E, Weingart LR (1993). Group goals and group performance*. Bri. J. Soc. Psychol. 32(4):307-334. |
|
|
Wenger E, McDermott RA, Snyder W (2002). Cultivating communities of practice: A guide to managing knowledge. Brighton, MA: Harvard Business Press. |
|
|
Woolley AW, Chabris CF, Petland A, Hashmi N, Malone TW (2010). Evidence for a Collective Intelligence Factor in the Performance of Human Groups. Sci. 330:686-688. |
|
|
Yan Y, Davison RM, Mo C (2013). Employee creativity formation: The roles of knowledge seeking, knowledge contributing and flow experience in Web 2.0 virtual communities. Computers Hum. Behav. 29(5):1923-1932. |
|
|
Zhou J (1998). Feedback valence, feedback style, task autonomy, and achievement orientation: Interactive effects on creative performance. J. Appl. Psychol. 83(2):261-276. |
|
Copyright © 2024 Author(s) retain the copyright of this article.
This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0
